ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

masterkiller · 15 January 2012, 08:11 AM

...will be presented Monday on SIHH 2012

/masterkiller

LAJM · 15 January 2012, 08:19 AM

My big question is what will be the price?

WatchTimes · 15 January 2012, 08:24 AM

It will make it a MUCH harder choice to choose
between the VC Overseas and the RO now....

The added WR rating of the VC is still a big factor to me.

B. Doggy · 15 January 2012, 10:19 AM

Man, they made a move that will make my next watch purchase much more difficult.

ocwatching · 15 January 2012, 10:44 AM

I am waiting to see how much and more photos...
I have been thinking about the 15300 and this makes it interesting...

kilyung · 15 January 2012, 01:36 PM

Some obvious changes:

- 41mm, up from 39mm
- replaced 12 o'clock AP logo with double baton marker
- small AP logo added
- elongated hour markers
- white date on dark background

I'm going to reserve judgement until I see one but I won't be releasing my 15300 anytime soon.

mdtddd2007 · 15 January 2012, 03:01 PM

I like it. Perfect size. I gonna think on this one now.

psv · 15 January 2012, 03:02 PM

The new hour markers seem a bit too long for my taste.

willski · 15 January 2012, 03:21 PM

Looks nice in pictures but lets wait for Monday :)

I'm assuming this is the new Jumbo? If so, will be sad to see it go...

If its replacing the 15300, 41mm with RO case would be too big for me so I'm safe :D

TSW · 15 January 2012, 06:04 PM

At this point i still prefer the 39mm 15300, The baton markers are looking a bit too long and also the double batons at 12 o'clock makes it look more like a sport watch.

But this can change when i get to try one on.

Another piece i look forward to try on is something new in two tone

MikeJaye · 15 January 2012, 06:39 PM

I may be biased having just bought a 15300 but I actually prefer the 39mm model. Not too Keene on the boule baton 12pm markers.

How soon do people expect to see these hit the shops are SIHH?

TSW · 15 January 2012, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeJaye

I may be biased having just bought a 15300 but I actually prefer the 39mm model. Not too Keene on the boule baton 12pm markers.

How soon do people expect to see these hit the shops are SIHH?

Not before summer, Boutiques and larger AD's will get them first then a even spread.

Fiery · 15 January 2012, 07:06 PM

As a guy cursed with a thin wrist, I am totally against upsizing existing iconic models. 39mm is the perfect size for me for the RO, although I cannot say any negative points on the design. It looked cool with the 15300, and I think the changes of 15400 aren't radical enough to ruin it.

All I'm wondering now is whether the 15400 would effectively replace the 15300 or the 15202 or both or none? If it arrives by keeping one of the 39mm models still in production, then the world will still be a perfect place

travisb · 16 January 2012, 12:34 AM

Only downside is I'm sure it's gonna come with a hefty price jump.
I'll look foward to checking it out when I head up to Manhatten next month.

Yoda · 16 January 2012, 01:06 AM

I wonder if they have tweaked the bracelet, Looks nice. Unfortunately with people getting more obese watchmakers are following by making bigger watches.

Mosco · 16 January 2012, 02:40 AM

One thing I was hoping for the next RO is a dual 'Big Date' aperture, either at '12' or at '6'. Plus I wonder if this one will have the exhibition caseback.

eric23 · 16 January 2012, 03:08 AM

I like the 15300 better, But this one is nice too.

Submarino · 17 January 2012, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

At this point i still prefer the 39mm 15300, The baton markers are looking a bit too long and also the double batons at 12 o'clock makes it look more like a sport watch.

But this can change when i get to try one on.

Another piece i look forward to try on is something new in two tone

I actually love the double batons at twelve resembling the first Royal Oak from 1972. Gorgeous piece. I think I know what I want for my 40 birthday this year!!!

TSW · 17 January 2012, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

I actually love the double batons at twelve resembling the first Royal Oak from 1972. Gorgeous piece. I think I know what I want for my 40 birthday this year!!!

Well i might be all in love when i get to see one in person in a month or two

The New Jumbo might be something for you then 37mm (i think) Only in blue dial with AP logo where it should

Submarino · 17 January 2012, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Well i might be all in love when i get to see one in person in a month or two

The New Jumbo might be something for you then 37mm (i think) Only in blue dial with AP logo where it should

I love the AP logo at 6 o'clock where it should've been on that new 41mm model. 37mm is too small for me.

T.S.Eliot · 17 January 2012, 06:49 AM

I wonder if the ROC will follow, if not this year maybe next year?

I actually prefer the 39 as it is already a biggish size watch due to the case and bezel.

Cheers,
K

liptonnr · 17 January 2012, 12:46 PM

I am anxious for price and details!

Submarino · 17 January 2012, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Well i might be all in love when i get to see one in person in a month or two

The New Jumbo might be something for you then 37mm (i think) Only in blue dial with AP logo where it should

By the way Thomas, what's up with that bolt head???

psv · 17 January 2012, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Well i might be all in love when i get to see one in person in a month or two

The New Jumbo might be something for you then 37mm (i think) Only in blue dial with AP logo where it should

That is a first. AP QA blunder.

Dickson Lim · 17 January 2012, 01:22 PM

AP is going on the right direction! The forged carbon Diver...

Adam K. · 17 January 2012, 01:47 PM

The beautiful new Jumbo is 39mm---same size as before, and carrying the same reference number (15202). The changes of a smaller clous de paris hobnail pattern on the dial, and the AP logo being moved south merely make the watch that much closer to the 1972 original model. Caliber of course remains the legendary 2120.

This one is absolutely awesome, and I have nothing but respect for Audemars in preserving a true brand icon!

kilyung · 17 January 2012, 03:20 PM

I'm getting a jumbo.

TSW · 18 January 2012, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

I love the AP logo at 6 o'clock where it should've been on that new 41mm model. 37mm is too small for me.

Edit The Jumbo is still 39mm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

By the way Thomas, what's up with that bolt head???

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

That is a first. AP QA blunder.

Only a prototype

00pumpkin · 4 February 2012, 04:37 AM

Wow, looks incredible. I love that watch with a white face.

15 January 2012, 08:11 AM	#1
masterkiller "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Sweden Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM... Posts: 1,403	New 41mm AP RO.... ...will be presented Monday on SIHH 2012 /masterkiller __________________ Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO

15 January 2012, 08:24 AM	#3
WatchTimes 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy Location: Metro Detroit USA Watch: It's a Rolex! Posts: 5,477	It will make it a MUCH harder choice to choose between the VC Overseas and the RO now.... The added WR rating of the VC is still a big factor to me. __________________ "You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun

15 January 2012, 10:19 AM	#4
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Man, they made a move that will make my next watch purchase much more difficult. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

15 January 2012, 10:44 AM	#5
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	I am waiting to see how much and more photos... I have been thinking about the 15300 and this makes it interesting... __________________ too much into watches...

15 January 2012, 06:04 PM	#10
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	At this point i still prefer the 39mm 15300, The baton markers are looking a bit too long and also the double batons at 12 o'clock makes it look more like a sport watch. But this can change when i get to try one on. Another piece i look forward to try on is something new in two tone __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

15 January 2012, 08:19 AM	#2
LAJM "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Larry Location: Canada Watch: Explorer II Posts: 270	My big question is what will be the price?

15 January 2012, 01:36 PM	#6
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,873	Some obvious changes: - 41mm, up from 39mm - replaced 12 o'clock AP logo with double baton marker - small AP logo added - elongated hour markers - white date on dark background I'm going to reserve judgement until I see one but I won't be releasing my 15300 anytime soon.

15 January 2012, 03:01 PM	#7
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,661	I like it. Perfect size. I gonna think on this one now.

15 January 2012, 03:02 PM	#8
psv "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: North America Posts: 11,066	The new hour markers seem a bit too long for my taste.

15 January 2012, 03:21 PM	#9
willski "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Will Location: New York Posts: 500	Looks nice in pictures but lets wait for Monday :) I'm assuming this is the new Jumbo? If so, will be sad to see it go... If its replacing the 15300, 41mm with RO case would be too big for me so I'm safe :D

15 January 2012, 06:39 PM	#11
MikeJaye Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: London Posts: 675	I may be biased having just bought a 15300 but I actually prefer the 39mm model. Not too Keene on the boule baton 12pm markers. How soon do people expect to see these hit the shops are SIHH?

15 January 2012, 07:06 PM	#13
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	As a guy cursed with a thin wrist, I am totally against upsizing existing iconic models. 39mm is the perfect size for me for the RO, although I cannot say any negative points on the design. It looked cool with the 15300, and I think the changes of 15400 aren't radical enough to ruin it. All I'm wondering now is whether the 15400 would effectively replace the 15300 or the 15202 or both or none? If it arrives by keeping one of the 39mm models still in production, then the world will still be a perfect place __________________ "In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)

16 January 2012, 12:34 AM	#14
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,330	Sure to be a winner.. Only downside is I'm sure it's gonna come with a hefty price jump. I'll look foward to checking it out when I head up to Manhatten next month.

16 January 2012, 01:06 AM	#15
Yoda Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London Watch: PP AP RM Posts: 794	I wonder if they have tweaked the bracelet, Looks nice. Unfortunately with people getting more obese watchmakers are following by making bigger watches.

16 January 2012, 02:40 AM	#16
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	One thing I was hoping for the next RO is a dual 'Big Date' aperture, either at '12' or at '6'. Plus I wonder if this one will have the exhibition caseback. __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

16 January 2012, 03:08 AM	#17
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	I like the 15300 better, But this one is nice too.

17 January 2012, 06:49 AM	#21
T.S.Eliot "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: K Location: KSA Watch: aholic Posts: 1,499	I wonder if the ROC will follow, if not this year maybe next year? I actually prefer the 39 as it is already a biggish size watch due to the case and bezel. Cheers, K

17 January 2012, 12:46 PM	#22
liptonnr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Nate Location: Pottsville, PA Watch: Sub-c LV, GMT's Posts: 988	I am anxious for price and details!

17 January 2012, 01:22 PM	#25
Dickson Lim "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: planet Posts: 1,517	AP is going on the right direction! The forged carbon Diver... __________________ Dream the impossible, and make it possible!

17 January 2012, 01:47 PM	#26
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	The beautiful new Jumbo is 39mm---same size as before, and carrying the same reference number (15202). The changes of a smaller clous de paris hobnail pattern on the dial, and the AP logo being moved south merely make the watch that much closer to the 1972 original model. Caliber of course remains the legendary 2120. This one is absolutely awesome, and I have nothing but respect for Audemars in preserving a true brand icon!

17 January 2012, 03:20 PM	#27
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,873	I'm getting a jumbo.

4 February 2012, 04:37 AM	#29
00pumpkin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dustin Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: GMT Master II Posts: 1,976	Wow, looks incredible. I love that watch with a white face. __________________ 16710, 116520, 216570, 116610LV

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)