The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 April 2018, 03:09 PM   #1
1mlee0916
"TRF" Member
 
1mlee0916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 183
Polished from Dallas RSC

Just got back my 40 year old Datejust from the Dallas RSC. It was polished for the first time ever. There’s a visual difference between the thickness of the lugs. Is this just something that’s to be expected when polishing? It maybe my OCD, but I got a watch back with slightly different lug widths! Is there anything I can do? Is it even worth complaining to the RSC?

Thanks in advance and sorry for the newb question.
1mlee0916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 03:11 PM   #2
Frakis
2024 Pledge Member
 
Frakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 2,819
Post a before and after picture if you want more people to comment.
__________________
Two Factor Authentication Enabled On My Account.
Frakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 03:25 PM   #3
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,918
Post some pics
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 03:44 PM   #4
vipereaper30
2024 Pledge Member
 
vipereaper30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: California USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,244
Stories like this make me never want to polish a watch. It'll never be the same again. Although I'd expect the RSC to be the best with a polishing service.
vipereaper30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 03:51 PM   #5
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,352
Lug width is different on crown side, designed like that
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 03:55 PM   #6
jvmartin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1mlee0916 View Post
Just got back my 40 year old Datejust from the Dallas RSC. It was polished for the first time ever. There’s a visual difference between the thickness of the lugs. Is this just something that’s to be expected when polishing? It maybe my OCD, but I got a watch back with slightly different lug widths! Is there anything I can do? Is it even worth complaining to the RSC?

Thanks in advance and sorry for the newb question.
Even if you were to complain there is no going back now... polished lugs are clearly different from how the lugs are originally cut... the condition of the casing will influence the end result of the polish... post pics!
jvmartin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 04:56 PM   #7
mui.richard
"TRF" Member
 
mui.richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 673
In sorry but it's a 40 year old watch and you expect it to come back like new? That's not OCD at all, just unreal expectations.

Maybe a photo would help?

Sent from my F8132 using Tapatalk
mui.richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 05:02 PM   #8
D O C
"TRF" Member
 
D O C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jim
Location: US
Watch: Rolex 116710LN
Posts: 599
You're not imagining things. I sent my watch off to Dallas RSC a number of years ago as well. I really didn't want it polished. But when I got it back I noticed the same thing. It seemed that the edges of the lugs seems more rounded off making the watch look thinner. For some reason having that sharp edge makes the watch look thick and substantial as it should.

Not a fan of Dallas RSC. I remember at the time I got my watch back a few days later I noticed there was a scratch on the end of the second hand. When I took it back to the AD they said they could send it back into Dallas RSC but I'd probably get charged again plus shipping etc. I was so glad to have my watch back after not having it for a month. I said I'd pass.
__________________
ROLEX 116710 LN GMTII "Random"
ROLEX 16710 GMTII Pepsi "P"
ROLEX 16622 SS/PL YM 29mm "V"

D O C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 06:27 PM   #9
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Depth of the marks plays a large part. Polishing = Removal of surrounding metal to at least the depth of the deepest scratch or ding.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2018, 07:19 PM   #10
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,598
1) Polishing SHOULD only remove base material to the depth of an indentation. What was the pre-polish condition ?

2) Never send a 40 year old watch to an RSC, they will suggest replacing (or may have replaced)some original parts that will de-value the watch. If this happened, I wouldn’t worry about the “polish”, but the original parts that are lost forever.
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 12:22 PM   #11
traxla
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Watch: Rolex Datejust
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
1) Polishing SHOULD only remove base material to the depth of an indentation. What was the pre-polish condition ?

2) Never send a 40 year old watch to an RSC, they will suggest replacing (or may have replaced)some original parts that will de-value the watch. If this happened, I wouldn’t worry about the “polish”, but the original parts that are lost forever.
Can't you decline or instruct the RSC not to replace the dial, hands and other parts?

I'll be sending my '74 DJ to the Dallas RSC before year end and I want to make sure they won't replace any of the external parts, or the dial and hands.
traxla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 01:31 PM   #12
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
The crown side lugs are slimmer than the non-crown side. Are you sure that you are not simply over-analyzing your freshly Serviced watch.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 02:15 PM   #13
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,012
He could be, but RSC Dallas unforgivably botched my 27 year old OysterQuartz's first-ever service refinish. Previous to that, they did an absolutely stellar job on my 16520. I will not use them again except for warranty work. I'd much rather use the services of one of the expert independents on TRF.
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 05:26 PM   #14
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
The crown lugs are thinner to begin with - you will see this if you look closely at a new watch (eg any ad/stock photo).

You only need to worry when the lugs are the same width.

Not sure if this was true 40 years ago, but it’s been like that for a long time.
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 07:40 PM   #15
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by traxla View Post
Can't you decline or instruct the RSC not to replace the dial, hands and other parts?

I'll be sending my '74 DJ to the Dallas RSC before year end and I want to make sure they won't replace any of the external parts, or the dial and hands.
Send it to LAWW, Rikki, ABC, or other vintage specialists around. If not, we’ll be reading your post of ruination.

__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 07:49 PM   #16
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Lug width is different on crown side, designed like that

Learned something new today!
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 08:18 PM   #17
mikkolopez
"TRF" Member
 
mikkolopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
If you specified only movement service then they would do just that ... after going through the motion getting you to agree to replace this or that. The last pitch would be polishing.

When I had my DJ services, I said movement only and I will not sign for or pay for anything else, that set them right.

Sadly if you hadn’t made that clear then it’s a free for all for RSC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
At my age now ...
I have SEEN everything,
I have HEARD everything,
I have even DONE everything,
I just don't REMEMBER everything.
mikkolopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 09:34 PM   #18
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by traxla View Post
Can't you decline or instruct the RSC not to replace the dial, hands and other parts?

I'll be sending my '74 DJ to the Dallas RSC before year end and I want to make sure they won't replace any of the external parts, or the dial and hands.
No RSC!! Big mistake. Find a reputable independent to service a watch this age!!
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2018, 09:47 PM   #19
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,798
See posts 5 and 12.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2018, 12:09 AM   #20
m j b
"TRF" Member
 
m j b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,095
I think that anyone who plans to send their watch to an RSC should measure all applicable areas with a micrometer and take lots of detailed high resolution pictures before packing it up. Then when these questions arise, they can measure everything and realize that nothing actually happened to the watch, and you cannot take off a measurable amount of metal with a cloth buffing wheel.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date.


Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...
m j b is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.