ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

J_1964 · 25 March 2018, 12:01 PM

Hello All,

I have an odd looking seconds hand on my Sub.The back end of the seconds hand is Shorter than any others that I have seen. Have you seen this variation before? The watch IS authentic. It was serviced by RSC Dallas in July last year. It's an F serial 2004? No Holes Case.

J_1964 · 25 March 2018, 01:28 PM

Anybody?

superstarmar · 25 March 2018, 01:34 PM

Here’s my older sub ... looks the same though it’s a 1987
16803 pre 16613 model ... No need to fret ...

J_1964 · 25 March 2018, 04:52 PM

Thank You For Your Input.

Andad · 25 March 2018, 05:17 PM

Very nice Jim.

And a great pix.

16610v · 25 March 2018, 06:28 PM

Truely classic hand

Xerxes77 · 25 March 2018, 06:35 PM

Nice watch!
I can’t compare but after me looks ok

Bladeshot · 25 March 2018, 11:45 PM

Here’s an older one I had, with lug holes, and an M-serial. Both were correct and look similar to yours.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Onikage · 26 March 2018, 12:02 AM

Stunner. A Rolex watchmaker armed with a loupe said it's ok. Can't say this is something I'd even look for. I know from staring at dials that the lollipop end normally passes over the 'O' in Rolex and the crosshair on the mercedes hand. I'm surprised more info/examples haven't been posted. Perhaps 5 digit refs are to be discussed in the 'Vintage' section now.

J_1964 · 26 March 2018, 10:48 AM

Mine doesn't reach the "O" only passes through "Perpetual" underneath that.

J_1964 · 26 March 2018, 10:50 AM

So, you have seen a "Lollipop" this short before?

Onikage · 26 March 2018, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_1964

So, you have seen a "Lollipop" this short before?

Maybe. I can't say I've noticed. The Vintage section is seriously your best bet. That's where variations of past references are discussed. Here your post is going to get shunted to page 5 within the hour by people gushing over the new SS Pepsi. Or wondering how utterly distraught WG BLRO owners must be.

superstarmar · 26 March 2018, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onikage

Maybe. I can't say I've noticed. The Vintage section is seriously your best bet. That's where variations of past references are discussed. Here your post is going to get shunted to page 5 within the hour by people gushing over the new SS Pepsi. Or wondering how utterly distraught WG BLRO owners must be.

Looks like Now’s the time to buy a WG BLRO !!!

sparky · 27 March 2018, 03:47 AM

I have a "P" ser # 16613 slate serti with Sel's, care holes, and gold through the buckle. The lollypop on the second hand fills the hole in the "O" of ROLEX (their caps)

25 March 2018, 01:28 PM	#2
J_1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Jim Location: NoCal USA Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,955	Anybody? Anybody?

25 March 2018, 04:52 PM	#4
J_1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Jim Location: NoCal USA Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,955	Thank You. Thank You For Your Input.

25 March 2018, 05:17 PM	#5
Andad 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 36,798	Very nice Jim. And a great pix. __________________ E

25 March 2018, 06:28 PM	#6
16610v "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: YL Watch: Submariner Posts: 701	Truely classic hand __________________ Instagram: litwing23

25 March 2018, 11:45 PM	#8
Bladeshot 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Grant Location: U.S. Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt Posts: 5,718	Here’s an older one I had, with lug holes, and an M-serial. Both were correct and look similar to yours. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Just another WIS who loves to trade...

25 March 2018, 06:35 PM	#7
Xerxes77 Banned Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Home! Posts: 3,307	Nice watch! I can’t compare but after me looks ok

26 March 2018, 12:02 AM	#9
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,758	Stunner. A Rolex watchmaker armed with a loupe said it's ok. Can't say this is something I'd even look for. I know from staring at dials that the lollipop end normally passes over the 'O' in Rolex and the crosshair on the mercedes hand. I'm surprised more info/examples haven't been posted. Perhaps 5 digit refs are to be discussed in the 'Vintage' section now. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

26 March 2018, 10:48 AM	#10
J_1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Jim Location: NoCal USA Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,955	Mine doesn't reach the "O" only passes through "Perpetual" underneath that.

26 March 2018, 10:50 AM	#11
J_1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Jim Location: NoCal USA Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,955	So, you have seen a "Lollipop" this short before?

27 March 2018, 03:47 AM	#14
sparky "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Real Name: Cal Location: Seattle, WA. Watch: explorer Posts: 657	I have a "P" ser # 16613 slate serti with Sel's, care holes, and gold through the buckle. The lollypop on the second hand fills the hole in the "O" of ROLEX (their caps)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)