ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Heimdall · 25 April 2018, 11:29 PM

Quick question from relative new member. I have an Explorer, a BLNR, and a SubC bracelet under order from a helpful AD that I intend to put on the BLNR. Now thinking on whether I should get a SubC with date or is too similar to my two watches? Not much diversification...

I also have a PP rose gold Calatrava and a Aquanaut so maybe that can be considered diversification? Have I caught the bug from TRF? Thoughts welcomed.

lguevara91 · 27 April 2018, 03:47 AM

Good problem to have! lol I used to lust over the TT blue sub for years... I now have the BLNR and to be honest I dont have a desire to get a sub. I feel that the two sports models look quite similar and would fill your collection well with either. A lot of guys on here have both and then some! lol

c41006 · 27 April 2018, 03:55 AM

I probably wouldn’t keep a BLNR and Sub LN together in the same collection but nothing wrong with it if that’s what you desire. Now a Sub LV and a BLNR would be different story.

brownbody · 4 May 2018, 12:48 PM

I have both. They look similar but are really different watches. The sub LN wears taller somehow on my wrist. Of the two, however, I am more partial to the BLNR. It is simply beautiful. I think the sub flies a little more under the radar. The BLNR is more blingy. Depends on where you are wearing it. I wear both a lot. Why do you want to change the bracelet? Glidelock? Too shiny? I also have a PP 5712/1a for special events as well as a PAM 328, a radiomir and an Omega Planet Ocean.

25 April 2018, 11:29 PM	#1
Heimdall "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: Hong Kong Watch: BLNR SD4K PP 5167A Posts: 116	To Buy or Not to Buy Quick question from relative new member. I have an Explorer, a BLNR, and a SubC bracelet under order from a helpful AD that I intend to put on the BLNR. Now thinking on whether I should get a SubC with date or is too similar to my two watches? Not much diversification... I also have a PP rose gold Calatrava and a Aquanaut so maybe that can be considered diversification? Have I caught the bug from TRF? Thoughts welcomed.

27 April 2018, 03:47 AM	#2
lguevara91 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: Texas Posts: 286	Good problem to have! lol I used to lust over the TT blue sub for years... I now have the BLNR and to be honest I dont have a desire to get a sub. I feel that the two sports models look quite similar and would fill your collection well with either. A lot of guys on here have both and then some! lol

27 April 2018, 03:55 AM	#3
c41006 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Joshua Location: Atlanta Watch: Pelagos Posts: 7,918	I probably wouldn’t keep a BLNR and Sub LN together in the same collection but nothing wrong with it if that’s what you desire. Now a Sub LV and a BLNR would be different story.

4 May 2018, 12:48 PM	#4
brownbody "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: Chicago Watch: BLNR, sub date Posts: 30	I have both. They look similar but are really different watches. The sub LN wears taller somehow on my wrist. Of the two, however, I am more partial to the BLNR. It is simply beautiful. I think the sub flies a little more under the radar. The BLNR is more blingy. Depends on where you are wearing it. I wear both a lot. Why do you want to change the bracelet? Glidelock? Too shiny? I also have a PP 5712/1a for special events as well as a PAM 328, a radiomir and an Omega Planet Ocean.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)