I'm sure this has been asked before but...

[Ketler]

...What is considered "Vintage" these days...???

[springer]

Originally Posted by Ketler

...What is considered "Vintage" these days...???

Have you tried the search function?

There are many threads here on the forum regarding vintage definitions.

The problem with defining anything is it usually is just an opinion and if you lined up 10 collectors and asked what is vintage, you'd receive eight to ten different opinions.

Here is a good starter thread for you to research vintage definitions:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=551004

[brandrea]

I’ll bite ... plexi

[SunTzu]

[Dan S]

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=742643
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=527572
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=81694
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4226538
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=94489
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3292746
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=22706
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=1477230
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3144255
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3511691
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3226311
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=982827
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4325919
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4678105
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=759036

[athom]

zzZZZzzzzzZZZzzzzZZZZZ....

[Jerrocop]

Originally Posted by Dan S

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=742643
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=527572
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=81694
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4226538
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=94489
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3292746
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=22706
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=1477230
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3144255
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3511691
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=3226311
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=982827
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4325919
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=4678105
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=759036

Very helpfull (not) . . . a list of threads asking the same question with the same vague answers.

[Kingface66]

Originally Posted by Jerrocop

Very helpfull (not) . . . a list of threads asking the same question with the same vague answers.

That's the point.
There IS no answer.

[roh123]

Normally plastic crystal and non witegold markers when it comes to Rolex sports watches. Four digit references preferrably with one or two exceptions like the ref 16750. Each to their own though.

[Dan S]

Originally Posted by Jerrocop

Very helpfull (not) . . . a list of threads asking the same question with the same vague answers.

Indeed. So do you think that this thread will magically provide a different result?

[athom]

Originally Posted by Jerrocop

Very helpfull (not) . . . a list of threads asking the same question with the same vague answers.

If you'd understand the question, you would understand than there are only vague and subjective answers...

[Jerrocop]

Originally Posted by Dan S

Indeed. So do you think that this thread will magically provide a different result?

Not from you

[Kingface66]

Oh, boy....

[offrdmania]

Ibtl

[springer]

Originally Posted by Jerrocop

Not from you

Since you obviously have it all figured out, why don't you provide the definite answer so everyone can quit bringing this subject up every other week.

[RolexBrian]

"denoting something of high quality, especially something from the past or characteristic of the best period of a person's work". Googled the word vintage...

[zapokee]

We shouldn't scoff when a new enthusiast asks a question that's been answered before.

Let's be nice when this question is asked. The whole point of the forum is to interact about our passion and enjoy the community. It's very sterile and unwelcoming to new users if we just roll our eyes and post links to other threads.

OP, some people place a time value on Rolex vintage, like 25 or 30 years.

Some people say it's four-figure reference numbers.

Some feel it's watches with plexiglass crystals.

It's tough to define. Like the judge said, there's no fixed definition of p*rn, but you know it when you see it.

[springer]

Originally Posted by zapokee

We shouldn't scoff when a new enthusiast asks a question that's been answered before.

Let's be nice when this question is asked. The whole point of the forum is to interact about our passion and enjoy the community. It's very sterile and unwelcoming to new users if we just roll our eyes and post links to other threads.

OP, some people place a time value on Rolex vintage, like 25 or 30 years.

Some people say it's four-figure reference numbers.

Some feel it's watches with plexiglass crystals.

It's tough to define. Like the judge said, there's no fixed definition of p*rn, but you know it when you see it.

Z, since you seem to be pointing a finger at me, and others, let me say that I have no issue pointing those to other threads that deal with the same question. Whether it is "what is vintage" or "what Submariner should I buy." Personally, I thought my reply was informative and provided links for the OP to read, research and make an informed opinion on his own.

These older threads are normally very informative and allow those asking to form an opinion regarding their question or concerns from others that had the same concerns or question in the past.

[Sirschwag]

Interesting perspective:

https://www.rescapement.com/blog/neo...collectibility

[zapokee]

Originally Posted by springer

Z, since you seem to be pointing a finger at me, and others, let me say that I have no issue pointing those to other threads that deal with the same question. Whether it is "what is vintage" or "what Submariner should I buy." Personally, I thought my reply was informative and provided links for the OP to read, research and make an informed opinion on his own.

These older threads are normally very informative and allow those asking to form an opinion regarding their question or concerns from others that had the same concerns or question in the past.

Fair opinion. I'm not pointing any fingers - and if I am, it's more at myself than anything. We should make newer enthusiasts feel welcome, just as others welcomed us.

[1675-David]

Originally Posted by zapokee

We should make newer enthusiasts feel welcome, just as others welcomed us.

A sticky might help!!

Title: How to Define Vintage

Pers quote

Originally Posted by roh123

Normally plastic crystal and non witegold markers when it comes to Rolex sports watches. Four digit references preferrably with one or two exceptions like the ref 16750. Each to their own though.

then the link list

[Ketler]

Originally Posted by zapokee

We shouldn't scoff when a new enthusiast asks a question that's been answered before.

Let's be nice when this question is asked. The whole point of the forum is to interact about our passion and enjoy the community. It's very sterile and unwelcoming to new users if we just roll our eyes and post links to other threads.

OP, some people place a time value on Rolex vintage, like 25 or 30 years.

Some people say it's four-figure reference numbers.

Some feel it's watches with plexiglass crystals.

It's tough to define. Like the judge said, there's no fixed definition of p*rn, but you know it when you see it.

Thank you for taking the time to answer me...Greatly appreciated...

[Dan S]

Originally Posted by zapokee

We shouldn't scoff when a new enthusiast asks a question that's been answered before.

Let's be nice when this question is asked. The whole point of the forum is to interact about our passion and enjoy the community. It's very sterile and unwelcoming to new users if we just roll our eyes and post links to other threads.

OP, some people place a time value on Rolex vintage, like 25 or 30 years.

Some people say it's four-figure reference numbers.

Some feel it's watches with plexiglass crystals.

It's tough to define. Like the judge said, there's no fixed definition of p*rn, but you know it when you see it.

Obviously this is aimed at me. I apologize if you feel it was rude of me to post a list of previous threads, but generally I think it's helpful for an OP to get a broad perspective on the answers to any question that is frequently asked, including the vintage question, the recommended vintage Rolex watchmaker question, etc. In any given thread, a certain number of people will answer, but if one reads 10 threads on the same topic, a more complete picture emerges, for better or for worse. And there is really no need for the same people to give the same opinions over and over again. If someone took the trouble to collect a group of threads for me to answer my question, I wouldn't complain.

Also, it's entertaining to keep track of all these threads.

[zapokee]

Originally Posted by Dan S

Obviously this is aimed at me. I apologize if you feel it was rude of me to post a list of previous threads, but generally I think it's helpful for an OP to get a broad perspective on the answers to any question that is frequently asked, including the vintage question, the recommended vintage Rolex watchmaker question, etc. In any given thread, a certain number of people will answer, but if one reads 10 threads on the same topic, a more complete picture emerges, for better or for worse. And there is really no need for the same people to give the same opinions over and over again. If someone took the trouble to collect a group of threads for me to answer my question, I wouldn't complain.

Also, it's entertaining to keep track of all these threads.

Dan, your input here is highly valued.