Rolex Submariner 116610LN vs Omega Seamaster Diver 300m

[SeanE]

I've never had a pull to the SMP. I'm not a fan of the skeleton hands or the wave dial, but I might consider a PO down the road. Since I traded my Tudor BB for my Explorer 2, I've missed having a dive watch. A PO would be a nice compliment for a lot less money. I would pick up another Tudor before I bought a SMP.

[donk344]

I am looking to get a PO soon, I already have the Rolex and I have to say, it is an awesome watch.

[Scott Cali]

I have them both, I’ve owned my SMP new since 1997 and the Sub just over a year...I will own them both forever....that being said, I’ll take the Sub hands down

[Jas14]

Omega packs more bang for buck, side by side also like the looks of it better.

[WatchThinker]

Originally Posted by ferdelious

i prefer the clean sharp lines of the rolex

+1

[samuel019]

Can’t get past the bracelets on Omega watches. None of them. Sorry nothing beats Rolex there.

[904VT]

I much prefer the 116610LN over Seamaster, but both nice. I'd take 300m on a strap though, bc it's tough to go to any other bracelet after wearing an Oyster.

[JohnGingerwood]

[atxdivebezel]

clearly inferior product? yeesh, coming in hot.

[speedracer5.0]

OMEGA makes great watches, I do prefer the PO to the SM, but would choose the Sub over both.

[peterpl]

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

That looks good.

imho for the price point these things are you wont find a better watch I reckon. It looks awesome and the movement technically its considerably better than many or most around the the same price point.