The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2018, 08:27 PM   #61
mountainjogger
2019 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 114060; 116900
Posts: 1,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Look what happened to the Rolex bubble backs. People who bought these for top dollar not so long ago lost their investment.

Antiques prices in general are on a all time low. Frisian clocks i.e. of which I bought and sold a lot would go for 3-4000 Euro. In the current market I can buy the same for 250 Euro.

At this time vintage is hot and perhaps a bit hyped, but you will never know what the future will bring.
Buy what you like to wear and forget about long term investment
x2!!!
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2018, 09:15 PM   #62
watchlovr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Nice to have a crystal ball I guess.

2 quotes here, one I agree with, one I don't, but all just opinions, nothing more, no-one actually knows.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
Bingo ! Anything smaller than 38mm will be a waste of time in the next few years.

Vintage watch market as a whole, has approximately 30 -50 year life span left. A different technology will replace the current market. Remember those things called pocket watches ?
watchlovr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2018, 01:44 AM   #63
SubKing
2019 Pledge Member
 
SubKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,157
in regards to this thread, I think the only thing all of us can do is look at the trends over the years, to help gauge what "might" happen. But we also need to prepare for the worst as well. We can look at these trends and have answers to the "why".

stamps, comic books, pocket watches, bubble backs, are just a few examples of things that were extremely hot and important, but today, not so much.

For example: less people collect stamps today which is why there isn't much of a market.

I personally feel that great and historically important examples will always remain valuable and important no matter the market. You can apply this to any luxury collectable.

I think moving forward to the next generation of collectors; it's human nature to yearn for luxury item's.. There will always be things like jewelry (watches included) cars, houses, boats, planes etc that are status symbols. As long as these luxury company's continue to evolve with the times, they will always remain relevant and important.

The real question is, when these company's evolve with the times, what will that do to the counterparts desirability?

No one knows. However, I have a theory.

In the early days, rolex was experimenting with the market and with many different models that are no longer made.

Today, Rolex is an established powerhouse that has it's foundations settled. They stick to their roots and keep to their classic and timeless designs. When they make a change or an update, they are so small, sometimes we cannot even see the change. This is why rolex has remained so strong.

This includes all the valuable vintage sports models we speak of today. These vintage sports models are the golden era of rolex design, that is why rolex holds their designs so close to this day.

So with that being said, how could these 1680's 5513's 1675's etc. etc. ever become irrelevant? Unless rolex stops producing submariners, I am not ever going to worry about my vintage subs.. Just my thoughts on the matter, but not fact by any means.
SubKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2018, 02:26 PM   #64
JLJL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10
There are so many better and more interesting ways to invest than a watch. And I say that as a watch collector.

A watch should come last, meaning after you’ve put a ton of money away into your retirement fund that will allow you to retire early and well. After putting enough into your kids’ 529 that will allow them to go to the most overpriced private colleges. After real estate. Even after angel investing in that startup that wants to be the next Uber for (fill in the blank).

I think only after you’ve spent your year’s money in all those investments should you “invest” in a Rolex watch. Cover those other bases first. It is after all a luxury item.

And even then, just buy it to enjoy it. That is the luxury, that you spend this enormous amount of money on something that may or may not retain its value.

Having said all that, rarity and condition I think are the biggest factors for future value potential. Later Rolex that’s been mass produced at modern volumes will be at a disadvantage. Stuff in bad condition may not pan out if charming patina falls out of taste.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JLJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2018, 01:05 AM   #65
SubKing
2019 Pledge Member
 
SubKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLJL View Post
There are so many better and more interesting ways to invest than a watch. And I say that as a watch collector.

A watch should come last, meaning after you’ve put a ton of money away into your retirement fund that will allow you to retire early and well. After putting enough into your kids’ 529 that will allow them to go to the most overpriced private colleges. After real estate. Even after angel investing in that startup that wants to be the next Uber for (fill in the blank).

I think only after you’ve spent your year’s money in all those investments should you “invest” in a Rolex watch. Cover those other bases first. It is after all a luxury item.

And even then, just buy it to enjoy it. That is the luxury, that you spend this enormous amount of money on something that may or may not retain its value.

Having said all that, rarity and condition I think are the biggest factors for future value potential. Later Rolex that’s been mass produced at modern volumes will be at a disadvantage. Stuff in bad condition may not pan out if charming patina falls out of taste.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rolex is a wearable investment that you can wear and enjoy without depreciation. Not many other investment grade items you can do that with. I watch becomes a part of you when you wear it. It's hard to explain, but its true.

that's why these investment topics come up from time to time.
SubKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2018, 01:08 AM   #66
1675-David
2019 Pledge Member
 
1675-David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,763
Without a shadow of a doubt the references I covet will appreciate quicker than I can put the funds together to buy them... same old same old!
1675-David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2018, 05:31 AM   #67
mrsentinel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SC, USA
Posts: 39
It would be cool if the mods made a poll of the references listed here. How do you guys go about pricing your vintage watches you are looking to buy? All I know to do is watch tons of ebay listings and look at private dealer pricing. There is obviously a lot of factors that makes price difficult to nail down with dial/hands/case condition etc.
mrsentinel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2018, 09:54 PM   #68
mountainjogger
2019 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 114060; 116900
Posts: 1,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1675-David View Post
Without a shadow of a doubt the references I covet will appreciate quicker than I can put the funds together to buy them... same old same old!
Scientist have verified that this a communicable disease. Spread by posting on this forum. Sorry but there is no cure.
__________________
The King of Cool.

Last edited by mountainjogger; 2 April 2018 at 09:54 PM.. Reason: Typo
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 May 2018, 02:37 AM   #69
jo89
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 70
I think the 116520 is a tremendous buy right now if you're thinking Daytona.
jo89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 May 2018, 03:38 AM   #70
saskmh
"TRF" Member
 
saskmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
"What are some of the high potential vintage Rolex investment?" Personally, I believe the same ones that are now coveted by collectors. I don't see any "dark horse" vintage models making any headway in the future. For the classics, I like the GMT 16700, GMT II 16710 and the Submariner 16610LV anniversary sets. Buy well and buy 'em all.
I always find it interesting to see folks say that the 16700 and 16710 are future classics but they always leave out the 16760, which in many respects is a bit more interesting.
__________________
16760//16622//16610//RCN Milsub//79220n//....
saskmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 May 2018, 07:45 PM   #71
bbturbo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Asia
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by jo89 View Post
I think the 116520 is a tremendous buy right now if you're thinking Daytona.
I'd imagine it'll be a rather long term view as the 116520 was only stopped 2-3 years ago? Last Zenith batch was in 2000?

I'm curious if the current 116500 is harder to find (vs 116520) in the grey market. The waiting list at ADs is quite insane.
bbturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 July 2019, 12:18 PM   #72
stevecrb01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1
Rootbeer

Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
any zenith daytona. 1675 pepsi. Root beer???
got a stunning rootbeer tiger eye judt been serviced by rolex
stevecrb01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 July 2019, 03:02 PM   #73
SubMarine
"TRF" Member
 
SubMarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 552
4 digit datejusts
__________________
A fool and his $ are soon parted.
SubMarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2019, 01:29 AM   #74
brigadoonb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Sophia Loren/Smurf
Posts: 174
16760....because I believe it has room to grow in value, thicker case than the popular 16710 and a shorter run time.
brigadoonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2019, 10:54 PM   #75
Harmon Rabb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sweden
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubMarine View Post
4 digit datejusts
Already own a few of the watches that has gone up in price beyond comprehension last couple of years. I just bought a four digit datejust. It´s the only model I´ve been thinking of buying lately. Not as investments but to use daily. As people getting more aware about the vintage prices of the 5513, 1665, 1675 and so on. The risk of getting the wrong kind of attention is higher than ever. I used to think you could walk around in a dressed down 5513. Those days are gone with all attention on social media. I wonder how long it takes when you no longer can dress down a 1601. I actually hope that the prices don´t move any more. I could not care less if they dropped. Than people could use them for what they are and really appreciate them. I never bought any of the vintage Rolex as investments. More like something you could use, and still get your money back more or less after a few years instead of having the money on an savings account. In those days most people bought the newest model they could find or a fake. The only fake watch of vintage models where the Paul Newman Daytona era Daytonas. Apart from that you never knew if people you met had a real Rolex of the fake version of one.
Harmon Rabb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2019, 11:12 PM   #76
Sublovin
"TRF" Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 3,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Look what happened to the Rolex bubble backs. People who bought these for top dollar not so long ago lost their investment.

Antiques prices in general are on a all time low. Frisian clocks i.e. of which I bought and sold a lot would go for 3-4000 Euro. In the current market I can buy the same for 250 Euro.

At this time vintage is hot and perhaps a bit hyped, but you will never know what the future will bring.
Buy what you like to wear and forget about long term investment
Very well said.
__________________
16610 Sub, 16570 Polar Explorer, 16220 Datejust
116660 Deepsea Sea Dweller, 1803 Day-Date
25600 Tudor Pelagos
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2019, 12:14 AM   #77
sillo38
2019 HARRODS BB Pledge Member
 
sillo38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by brigadoonb View Post
16760....because I believe it has room to grow in value, thicker case than the popular 16710 and a shorter run time.
More importantly, the first GMT II.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2019, 02:22 AM   #78
Racer X
"TRF" Member
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Unknown
Posts: 902
I agree with the "buy what you like and forget about investment" viewpoint. The truth is that no one knows what the future values will be like. In the end, everything is only worth what others are willing to pay for it.

As another poster said, values of collectibles are often highly correlated to one's generation. As an example, I have a baseball card collection from my pre-teens that I thought I'd sell for a fortune one day. I recently looked into what they're worth, and they're worth about the same as they were in the '80s, and that doesn't take into account inflation! Younger generations just aren't that interested in them.

Another example is cars, which are also items that you can enjoy and that can increase in value. Pre-WW2 cars used to be worth a lot more, but then the guys who really like them (those who remembered them from their childhoods) passed on. Same for '60s muscle cars. Watch Barrett-Jackson auctions and see who's buying those cars -- all Q-tips.

IMO, if you want an investment, go with a traditional investment vehicle, like stocks, bonds, and real estate. If the watches you buy increase in value, great. Just don't count on them to do so for your retirement.
Racer X is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2019, 03:05 AM   #79
cardiel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 167
I used to think you could walk around in a dressed down 5513. Those days are gone with all attention on social media

couldn't disagree more - nobody is looking at your watch, and watch geeks are a tiny percentage of the general population.
cardiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2019, 04:02 AM   #80
Richard Carver
2019 Pledge Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 1,717
Buy what you like and wait...

I paid $1225 for this in 2001 :)
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2019, 05:02 AM   #81
milwatch126
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Ireland/Saudi
Watch: 1962, 5512
Posts: 109
My two penny thoughts are:

Seadweller 116600 and Chromalight Daytona 116520.

M
milwatch126 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


*Banner Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2019, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.