ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 March 2008, 12:32 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
|
RSC - send it back!
Tell us what happens - I too would just call them and send directly USPS registered and insured mail.
__________________
Present: 116710LN SS GMT-Master II C Past: 16610 SS Sub Date |
10 March 2008, 12:59 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
|
As the others have said, take it to an AD
__________________
Daytona 116520 |
10 March 2008, 01:30 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Oh my.....looks as if.....
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
10 March 2008, 02:21 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Posts: 1,857
|
Take it to the AD and have them check it out.
__________________
|
10 March 2008, 02:39 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt O
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 143
|
Yup, RSC or AD for sure...
sounds like this ones have baked (pun intended) or someone left off the top coat... I wouldnt be happy with it at all... |
10 March 2008, 03:02 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ca.
Watch: SS only
Posts: 811
|
Off to the AD u go and let us all know what your outcome is please!!! WOW?
|
10 March 2008, 03:13 PM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Nas
Location: Singapore
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 230
|
scratched by diamond ring?
or the bezel is ceramic but the scratch is on the outercoat? |
10 March 2008, 03:40 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Sounds like a trip to RSC to me. Good luck and keep us posted on the findings.
__________________
Ron |
10 March 2008, 03:46 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
|
Quote:
it's my understanding that it is solid ceramic, there is no outer coat. the rolex reps told me they have to use the same tools and methods to polish them as they do diamonds because it is too hard for anything else.
__________________
cmr OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona, |
|
10 March 2008, 04:18 PM | #40 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
And leave that job to RADO alone....the masters of ceramics!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
10 March 2008, 06:02 PM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
There is no protective film on the ceramic bezel when purchased, Peter. It comes with a regular plastic bezel protector.
Anyway, it does look like a flaw to me, too. So it's good advice to have the bezel insert exchanged under warranty since a new bezel insert costs a lot! See this quote from Ironstark: Quote:
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
10 March 2008, 08:10 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Jamal
Location: Dubai, U.A.E.
Posts: 862
|
__________________
SS Explorer II SS Submariner C LV - SS DATEJUST II - MILGAUSS GV - SS GMT-MASTER II C - SS/P YACHT-MASTER |
11 March 2008, 03:17 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: Rolex TT, Blue Sub
Posts: 127
|
I have to add my 2c worth and agree with those who have said that this appears to be a manufacturing defect.
I would call the RSC, explain and ask for their instructions for return. I've had my GMT IIc since October of last year and it's had some pretty good knocks against door jambs, etc., without a scratch. Good luck and keep us posted. Tempus Fugit, Trainer |
13 March 2008, 06:37 AM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: JT
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 48
|
Any follow-up on this post.......
Thanks. |
13 March 2008, 06:49 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Jos
Location: South Africa
Watch: SS GMT IIc
Posts: 741
|
I tend to agree with the others and say it's a defect. It looks too angular for a scratch, which is usually linear. If it was scratched in order to leavthat mark it would have been more a direct strike than a classic scratch. I think you would have remembered that.
Send it to RSC and hear what they say...
__________________
Life isn't what it is...it's what it looks like |
13 March 2008, 08:29 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 87
|
I do not wan to seem rude or mean or anything like that, But I have to ask. Why buy such a great watch to let i sit in the box and only wear it occasionally I use to wear my TT all the time to the amazement of some and my new SS sub has not left my wrist since buying it 2 weeks ago but .......it would be like leaving my BMW in the garage and not driving it so to miss this beautiful machines awesome power...no way to both.
|
13 March 2008, 08:34 AM | #47 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 49
|
It's a good point about a defect - I'll bet this forum would have heard about more marks and scratches if it were going to be a commonplace failure of the ceramic material.
|
13 March 2008, 09:31 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fl
Posts: 1,081
|
Did you by chance take pictures on day one?
I took lots and lots of pictures of both my watches just for comparsion sake as they get aged. If you have before and after you can either prove an imperfect when new out of the box OR scratched during normal wear. I d call rolex in NYC and tell them you arent happy with the scuff/scratch and they will probably tell you to send it in. Pics may help either way. Don |
13 March 2008, 12:30 PM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: AJ
Location: Australia
Posts: 732
|
Hmm.....I've worn mine (since new) every single day (for 7 months) - play golf with it, run with it, swim with it, go drinking with it, bashed it against all sorts of metal objects (seriously) - not to mention the bling my wife wears (I always run for cover when she starts waiving her arms around LOL) - and whilst the shiny stainless links are a bit scratched, the face/bezel is as it left the factory. Bravo Rolex. I'd go get it checked out. I've heard that Rolex may be able to polish any scratches out of ceramic - like how they touch up the saph glass - but I'd definitely get it checked out. Good luck!
|
13 March 2008, 12:52 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
Sorry to hear the bad news I was aware that the ceramic bezels could break (My AD has replaced two so far at a large $734.00 per bezel. Ceramic bezels don't like being dropped onto tile they tend to break) I had no idea they scratch????
__________________
Always working...by choice |
13 March 2008, 02:02 PM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South East USA
Posts: 671
|
I just took another VERY close look at my ceramic bezel. In my line of work, it's constantly banging around, and getting into things....not one scratch or blemish on the bezel....wish I could say the same thing about the braclet!!
That seriously must be a defect of time kind....or maybe some really stubborn dirt? |
13 March 2008, 03:33 PM | #52 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
I originally noticed the scatches when I was cleaning the bezel with a Rolex cleaning cloth. The "scratches" wouldn't come off, even with a lot of force. Upon examining it closely they really looked like scratches or some other physical flaw in the bezel. I then became paranoid, thinking that the ceramic could easily be scratched, far more easily than I had instinctively thought, so I didn't try any herculean efforts at cleaning the bezel as I was afraid that would only make matters worse. But, after reading your post, I decided to take another look. I still couldn't "scrub off" the scratches with the cleaning cloth, no matter how hard I tried -- it didn't appear to be making a difference at all. The next thing I tried might make some of you wince.. I grabbed a 70% alochol swab and started rubbing it against the scratches. The first one didn't seem to make much difference, although it seemed like the scratches were ever-so-slightly harder to see. But I continued this with a few swabs and little by little, the scratches disappeared. (Don't worry, I gave the Rolex a thorough running under water each time I used the alcohol. Does anyone else get nervous placing a Rolex under running water? It gives me pause each time, even though I know better.) Now I can't see the scratches at all. I'll have to check again with different lighting (it was most obvious with sunlight hitting it), but I think they may actually be gone. It is certainly better, which casts doubt on it being scratches. This makes me very happy. Now I'm a little baffled as to what the residue was. It really had the appearance of a scratch and it took the alcohol to clear it away. It almost seems like a resin or glue of some type -- could this be some kind of residue left over from the manufacturing process? I can't think of anything I would have been exposed to that would have left that kind of residue on the bezel. Well, for now it looks like the mystery was solved, and it won't be making a trip back to RSC. Really bizarre. Thanks to everyone for the comments and suggestions. Looks like the strength of the ceramic bezel has been vindicated, for now! |
|
13 March 2008, 03:38 PM | #53 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
|
|
13 March 2008, 03:52 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: rudolph
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 2,026
|
that's why they sell insurance,that $50-60 bucks a year is worth it.
__________________
tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D) |
13 March 2008, 03:54 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Mireyna
Location: s o t r
Watch: your back!
Posts: 2,282
|
Talk about good news!
I'm glad the mystery got solved!
__________________
#6267 He who knows no foreign language does not know his own.-Goethe |
14 March 2008, 01:31 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Miguel Cornejo
Location: El Paso Tx
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 488
|
Scott you scared the behebejebeis out of me!!!! I started looking at my bezel that day and turned out Isaw some "scratches too!!!" so I buffed with my shirt, and they did not go away!!!! I was getting really scared, so I put some water and buff again... Yep it cleaned away! it was grime or something, but for some reazon it can addere to the bezel real good, and since the bezel has those numbers machined, those "grooves" will not allow the cloth to clen right on the first rubb!
Now we are a bunch of happy campers the GMTII C owners!!!! Thanks for sharing your experience! |
14 March 2008, 09:10 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
guys,
insure the watch and forget about it; if something happens, you are covered! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.