AP Royal Oak 15300 Fit

[mitchie41]

Hey Everyone:

I'm in the market for an AP Royal Oak. Either 15300st or 15400st.

Unfortunately, the only AP dealer in town has sold out of 15300ST models so I have no way to see if the 39mm case will fit me.

Anyone know how the AP RO fits (larger, same, smaller) compared to any of the standard 40mm Rolex models (GMT II, Sub, Expl II) as I do have those watches to compare to.


Regards,
M

[dddrees]

A bit but not to much smaller then the the GMIIC.

[p_mcgee]

15300 is slightly smaller in diameter but way thinner & less bulky than a subc or gmt2c

[Fiery]

Due to their very long lugs Royal Oaks generally wear larger than their diameter. After the Sub-C, when I strap on my RO 15300ST I could swear it is a 42mm watch. However, as McGee stated, it's much thinner than a Sub-C, and also you have to get used to the look of the integrated bracelet.

As for 15300 vs 15400: if you have an average sized or bigger wrist, then I'd say you should go for the 15400. However, if you have a thin, sub-6.5" wrist like me (6.3 inches here), then 15300 will be a better fit. Here's how the 15300ST looks like on a 6.3 inch wrist:



And for comparison, here's how the same wrist wears a Sub-C:

[MP5]

Wow, Im kinda shocked with how big the AP looks

[Darlinboy]

For me, the RO 15300ST wears larger than most 40mm watches because of the lug-to-lug dimensions. The white dial version gives it even more "visual" size, IMO.

[texex91]

Own Sub-C's and tried on 15300 and found it too small.

NOW, that was just because I tend to like things just a bit larger.

15300 is obviously more dressy, so it may be the perfect watch to accompany your Sub.

Still waiting to try on 15400...

[kilyung]

On a 6.5" wrist...















Let me know if you need more comparison pics. Hmmm. I need better pics of the 116619.

[roh123]

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

[kilyung]

Originally Posted by roh123

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

That's an excellent comparo!

[dddrees]

Originally Posted by roh123

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

Great comparison.

[kilyung]

Originally Posted by dddrees

Great comparison.

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

[roh123]

Originally Posted by kilyung

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

I'm afraid it's been through worse. I use my watches.

[dddrees]

Originally Posted by kilyung

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

Agree.

[B. Doggy]

The 15300 wears larger than my 16610, hands down. I have 7.25" wrists and think the 15300 dimensions and fit are perfect. Personally don't think I would want to go for the 41mm model. Not in the RO anyway. Would love to get a ROO some day though.

[TSW]

One word....Perfect!!

[wrxsti]

excellet choice, that is a fantastic reference that i have had my eye on for some time, wow stunning pics Mike!

[KlausM]

AP RO 15300 and Rolex SD 1665.




BR
Klaus

[TimeOnHand]

My 15300 on 6.5" wrist. Fit really well.

[kilyung]

Originally Posted by TimeOnHand

My 15300 on 6.5" wrist. Fit really well.

Perfect is a better description.

[TSW]

AP 15300 vs 26300

[ydna808]

Originally Posted by kilyung

Perfect is a better description.

[mitchie41]

Thanks for all the replies guys!

[B. Doggy]

So which one then?

[mitchie41]

I'm thinking 15400st. I managed to find a ROC to try on and I found it on the small side.

I have large wrists and I think the 15400 will fit better. Just need to wait until my local AD has them in stock.

Thanks!
Mitch

[texex91]

Originally Posted by mitchie41

I'm thinking 15400st. I managed to find a ROC to try on and I found it on the small side.

I have large wrists and I think the 15400 will fit better. Just need to wait until my local AD has them in stock.

Thanks!
Mitch

I agree with you in many ways.

Think the larger size will start appealing to many once they see it (and it starts to replace the smaller 15300).

For the loyal RO fans, they might turns toward the 15202 moving forward, as the 15300 will be replaced by 15400.

Let us know what you think of 15400 once you try it on.

[kilyung]

Originally Posted by TSW

AP 15300 vs 26300

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

[Submarino]

My 15300 (second pic) on my 7.5" wrist and the 15400 while trying it on a week ago.

[texex91]

Originally Posted by kilyung

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

Mike the ROC would be a PERFECT addition to the already stunning rotation. If there were one that I would replace the Daytona with it would be the ROC.

Originally Posted by Submarino

My 15300 (second pic) on my 7.5" wrist and the 15400 while trying it on a week ago.

Hal that 15400 looks perfect on your wrist IMHO. 15300 is sharp, but comparing the two, 15400 looks more fitted to your wrist. What were your impressions between the two

[Submarino]

Originally Posted by texex91

Mike the ROC would be a PERFECT addition to the already stunning rotation. If there were one that I would replace the Daytona with it would be the ROC.



Hal that 15400 looks perfect on your wrist IMHO. 15300 is sharp, but comparing the two, 15400 looks more fitted to your wrist. What were your impressions between the two

While the 15400 looked good on my wrist, I am a purist when it comes to Royal Oaks. 39mm Royal Oak is always my choice. Plus something I didn't like about the 41mm is that the flange around the dial seems to be taller because is flat instead of curved, hence making the dial sit lower than on the 39mm. It might just be an optical illusion, not a 100% sure though. Still a very nice piece!