ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 October 2022, 08:10 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: New Jersey USA
Watch: DJ / ND Sub
Posts: 292
|
16610 questions
Hello all. I am considering this 16610 I found online being sold by a jewelry store. It’s supposed to be an L serial from about 1989. Dealer states the lume does not charge/glow at all. I’m certainly no expert, which is why I’m here, but this dial does not look like lume/patina from 1989. What do you all think?
|
2 October 2022, 08:57 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
|
Overpolished case but dial and hands look original
|
3 October 2022, 02:11 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,039
|
Does not look unusual for a watch of that age.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 October 2022, 08:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,157
|
Looks ok a bit of a bad polish job
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
4 October 2022, 04:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: ITALY
Watch: 16610LN - 126600
Posts: 335
|
I have a 16610 serial X, hence quite close to your (1992)
and the dial looks identical. Mine has no patina too. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.