The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 June 2017, 06:44 AM   #31
mattty
"TRF" Member
 
mattty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: England, UK
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
The best bang for the buck is relative. If you are talking about a watch holding its value, you are talking about the SS Daytona. If you are talking about getting a Rolex for the least amount of money, then you are looking at the least expensive model like the Oyster Perpetual or a pre-owned DJ for even less.
Agree, but investment is different from bang for buck otherwise It would be Daytona.

Bang for buck is affordable, but looks a expensive but something which serves a great purpose but not necessarily requires a huge lay out
mattty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 06:45 AM   #32
ssetem
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Watch: blro,daytc,lv,blnr
Posts: 233


This datejust 41 is pretty good value I think
ssetem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 06:56 AM   #33
Helmi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by zjd168 View Post
BLNR or Black Sub


Exactly, I would add the Daytona
Helmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:13 AM   #34
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
SS sky dweller hands down.

With the dual time function, the annual calendar complication and totally unique command bezel it is the one watch IMHO in the current lineup that should actually be priced higher than it actually is.

The rest of the rolex lineup seems to be priced about right for the specific niche that it fills. The sub is pretty much spot on price wise, explorer is as well, same for the GMTII, OP, and DJ etc.. The daytona might be a bit low but not as much as the sky dweller. Thats how i define "best bang for your buck"

And no, I'm not on the list for one at the moment, so I'm not just voting for "my watch"
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:21 AM   #35
Chiefs
"TRF" Member
 
Chiefs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 120
16570

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Chiefs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:32 AM   #36
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by swils8610 View Post
The one you get the most enjoyment out of wearing.



Exactly right. If you follow this rule, it will reduce the "flipper's tax"....
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:32 AM   #37
Vaxe
"TRF" Member
 
Vaxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
the entire professional line is solid, steel and gold
Vaxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:36 AM   #38
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattty View Post
Agree, but investment is different from bang for buck otherwise It would be Daytona.

Bang for buck is affordable, but looks a expensive but something which serves a great purpose but not necessarily requires a huge lay out
Using that as the definition of "bang for the buck", I would say a pre-owned DJ. You can purchase one for well under $5K USD and it is the most widely recognized Rolex by the non-WIS public.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:44 AM   #39
presario
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,428
Explorer II 5 digit.
__________________
presario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 07:45 AM   #40
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,478
The Explorer would be my choice.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:07 AM   #41
ILikeTacos
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heff View Post
A watch loses 50% of its value after you leave the store? I'm gonna need some sources on this. Even the most unpopular watches shouldn't lose 50% immediately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sure if you bought just about any normal production Hublot at list price, you would find this to be true.

As far as the original question, I think in terms of what you will be getting, a SS SkyDweller is a no-brainer. A full in-house annual calendar for 14.4k? That's pretty amazing bang for the buck. If you are looking at specifically sports models, I'd argue that the Explorer 2 is hands down the best, especially given that you can pick them up new for 20-25% off list from an AD.
ILikeTacos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:23 AM   #42
emersm
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
emersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,478
Probably 16570, in my opinion.
emersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:39 AM   #43
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,553
The white Milgauss and the Air King, both new 40mm versions are bargains but I would only call them that of you like them. They can be had unworn for around $5000. Buy what you like and can afford, not because it is available at a discount.
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:41 AM   #44
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,510
I'd say a five digit Explorer II, or a Milgauss. There are enough options in each line to get into a model you like.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:53 AM   #45
kauffee
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
I feel like Milgauss at MSRP of $8200 in the US is probably the worst in terms of bang for your buck.... 3 hand movement, no ceramic anywhere, no flip lock on the clasp. Lot of money for green glass and a tub of iron.

Agree that the Explorers and Sub ND are pretty solid bets.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 08:55 AM   #46
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,345
I personally think that the new Air King is a steal.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 09:01 AM   #47
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,219
SS SkyD and the TBB steel and gold, for getting the most for your money.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 09:05 AM   #48
socialpro
"TRF" Member
 
socialpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Alex
Watch: Rolex || Panerai
Posts: 1,348
I'd say 6 digit Sub. Highly in demand (easy to flip / keeps resale) - and reasonable price of entry. Very classic watch as well fit to any/all scenarios.
socialpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 09:05 AM   #49
Pimpsy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Jersey
Watch: PP 5712/1A
Posts: 518
Hard to go wrong with a pre-owned, good condition SS Sub 116610. (Personally, I would only get a ceramic sub)
An iconic piece that will almost certainly hold value exceptionally well.
Pimpsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 09:14 AM   #50
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
I feel like Milgauss at MSRP of $8200 in the US is probably the worst in terms of bang for your buck.... 3 hand movement, no ceramic anywhere, no flip lock on the clasp. Lot of money for green glass and a tub of iron.

Agree that the Explorers and Sub ND are pretty solid bets.
They may be $8200 somewhere but depending on color they can be found new or still stickered between $5k and $6k all day long. I do agree about the Explorers, especially the 39mm Explorer I.
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:11 AM   #51
kauffee
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengineer View Post
They may be $8200 somewhere but depending on color they can be found new or still stickered between $5k and $6k all day long. I do agree about the Explorers, especially the 39mm Explorer I.
Yeah, I was just referring to MSRP which seems off for the Milgauss. Seems like around $7500 would be more reasonable.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:12 AM   #52
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of Dulwich View Post
The 2016 Air King. Same case and anti-magnetic qualities as the Milgauss, however much cheaper.
That's my exact opinion too
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:14 AM   #53
Boothroyd
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,183
Any of the 3 current Explorer models, as well as the Explorer MK1 214270.

And Grady is right. For a list of $6250 US, the Air King is a great deal as well.
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:20 AM   #54
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,214
The OP 39mm is best value in my books. Very affordable but timeless Rolex.
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:23 AM   #55
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Any gold Rolex is a great value. You will not find a cheaper all gold watch from another brand that still retains great value.
So the gold apple watch is a bad idea?
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:24 AM   #56
fishingbear
2024 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaycnyp View Post
Explorer2 hands down. It has almost everything the gmt has, minus the rotating bezel for $2000 less!
Yep, this.
fishingbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:25 AM   #57
wb55
"TRF" Member
 
wb55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: -
Posts: 988
Brand new = no date sub, exp 1 v2.0 or maybe BLNR
Pre owned = sea dweller 16600 / 16660, DateJust or the 5 digit Submariner date
wb55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:33 AM   #58
slide13
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 931
I think ere are 3 that are great values in the lineup.

114200/116000/114300 - The OP in 34, 36, or 39mm is classic Rolex and the cheapest entry into the lineup (for men). You get an amazing in-house movement and all the modern updates for a great price.

116200 - Great price for a classic watch with date. A little dressy but always classic and suitable in any situation.

114060 - If you want an iconic Professinal model with a rotating bezel the Sub C is the perfect choice. $1k less than the Sub date or a GMT this is the best deal going for that classic Rolex sports model with bezel. You get the fantastic Glidelock bracelet too!
slide13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:37 AM   #59
Portland
"TRF" Member
 
Portland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaycnyp View Post
Explorer2 hands down. It has almost everything the gmt has, minus the rotating bezel for $2000 less!

It seems like many others agree with you (myself included). I know it's nearly impossible to gauge future value, but I often wonder if certain runs of the 16570 will experienced a similar desirability and price jump in the future as the 5 digit GMT Master II did.
Portland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2017, 10:47 AM   #60
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Daytona Z or C. 16710. I'd argue. AirKing is also pretty good value.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
daytona , explorer , market , milgauss , submariner


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.