The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 17 October 2008, 10:24 AM   #31
SUPERDOC
"TRF" Member
 
SUPERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
I wonder why the face doesn't say 'Day-Date II'

I'm still on the fence... the classic 36mm is so elegant.

41mm is very big for a dress watch... I have a 41mm aqua terra, and it is a big chunk of metal...

everyone is making a big deal about the deepsea, when that is only a 3mm increase in diametre...this one jumps up 5mm, and no one has batted an eye...
SUPERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 10:26 AM   #32
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDOC View Post
...this one jumps up 5mm, and no one has batted an eye...
That's 'cause most of us were waiting for such a jump. Of course, this is in anticipation that some day Rolex will decide to pump up the DJ from 36 to 41 mm......and that'll be the day to really celebrate.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 10:37 AM   #33
chicagowatchman
"TRF" Member
 
chicagowatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Watch: Platinum DDMasterp
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDOC View Post
I wonder why the face doesn't say 'Day-Date II'

I think the reason is they are still useing the 36mm dials....they should have made the dial larger and the bezel smaller
__________________
Men's Platinum Day Date Masterpiece
Men's 18k Day Date Crown Collection
Men's Franck Muller 18k Conquistador Cortez
Men's SS Cartier Pasha

MEMBER # 5534 USA
CHICAGO IL
chicagowatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 10:41 AM   #34
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagowatchman View Post
I think the reason is they are still useing the 36mm dials....they should have made the dial larger and the bezel smaller
How can a 36 mm dial fit into a 41 mm watch?

The dials are new, compatible with the larger case.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 11:40 AM   #35
ral
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDOC View Post
I wonder why the face doesn't say 'Day-Date II'

I'm still on the fence... the classic 36mm is so elegant.

41mm is very big for a dress watch... I have a 41mm aqua terra, and it is a big chunk of metal...

everyone is making a big deal about the deepsea, when that is only a 3mm increase in diametre...this one jumps up 5mm, and no one has batted an eye...
I do not think it is the 43mm case diameter of the Deepsea that cause people to take note... it was the 18mm case thickness.

Quote:
platinum too pricey for me...
Unfortunately that is true for me, and a lot of us I suspect.

270g or so... how in his right mind would wear a watch like that and look at the size of that bezel... Rolex taking designs ques from Rado?

Sigh... it does not help... it is still growing on me
ral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 11:42 AM   #36
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by ral View Post
I do not think it is the 43mm case diameter of the Deepsea that cause people to take note... it was the 18mm case thickness.
Correct!! The width of 43 mm is pretty acceptable to most. The thickness may not be everyone's cuppa!!

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 11:46 AM   #37
ral
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
How can a 36 mm dial fit into a 41 mm watch?

The dials are new, compatible with the larger case.

JJ
The dial is new and a bit larger. If they had used the same dial, it proportions would have looked more like a Daytona. They also have larger dials on the Milgauss so they could easily make one for the Day Date II.

But it is a Day-Date gents, which will eventually see that dial studded by diamonds. I think Rolex wanted a little more space for that.
ral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2008, 11:48 AM   #38
ral
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
That's 'cause most of us were waiting for such a jump. Of course, this is in anticipation that some day Rolex will decide to pump up the DJ from 36 to 41 mm......and that'll be the day to really celebrate.

JJ
I am kind of hoping the Datejust makes a move to 38mm or 39mm, but I guess it will follow the proportions of the Day Date.
ral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2008, 06:57 PM   #39
SS Oyster
"TRF" Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 8,800
Saw DD2 today at my AD in the everest rose gold, fluted bezel --- absolutely amazing. However, despite how great it looked, if I could afford a gold rolex, I'd purchase the GMT IIC with the green dial - the most amazing watch I've ever slipped over my wrist. Unfortunately, it didn't remain. Some day....
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2008, 09:45 AM   #40
Burley1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 22
I have a deep sea and it is tough to get used to the 18mm thickness for sure. kinda tough wearing it with a dress shirt.

I guess I need to wear the TT sub for that.



Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Correct!! The width of 43 mm is pretty acceptable to most. The thickness may not be everyone's cuppa!!

JJ
Burley1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2008, 01:34 AM   #41
tbinaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 3
I thought I would add this to the gallery
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC02072.jpg (60.2 KB, 1754 views)
tbinaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2008, 02:12 AM   #42
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Just got back from Vegas and put one on my wrist. I was very disappointed. The bezel is just odd looking and the watch made a leap from elegant to bulky in my book.
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2008, 02:26 AM   #43
tbinaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 3
Obviously I disagree. I would never have owned one of the smaller ones, too "old man" for my taste. I never intended on buying this as I already have another Rolex, but when I saw it in the case it was a must have for me.
tbinaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2008, 06:48 AM   #44
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Yeah, my dad loved it when he put it on, and honestly, it looked good on him. If you like it, rock it for all it's worth brother!
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2009, 05:01 PM   #45
fleetwood1976
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 49
I am interested in the day date II. What is the best way to see all of the dial options. I checked at my AD and asked if they had a catalog showing the variations because I was not having much luck on rolex.com. She replied they did not have one. I was wanting to know if they made it with a blue wave dial. The black just doesn't do it for me.
fleetwood1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2009, 05:53 PM   #46
ral
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
Beautiful watch. Was wondering about the weight. How does it feel on your wrist?
ral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2009, 03:57 AM   #47
Moissanite
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3
Can anyone tell me exactly what books and papers come with the Rolex Day Date II? Just purchased one from AD, but don't think I received the correct books. Please email me at newestgem@aol.com
Moissanite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2009, 03:04 PM   #48
RoatanMan
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Roatan
Posts: 42
Question...

What are the dial options on the White Gold Day Date II...? I want to get one but I would like to view all of the available dials first...
RoatanMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2009, 07:43 PM   #49
jtvision
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver
Watch: Seiko to Rolex
Posts: 225
Crown is tiny.
jtvision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2009, 11:13 AM   #50
rowlex
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 17
The coolest dial i have ever seen was on a day date 2 a dark blue wave dial man it was sweet,
rowlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2009, 08:23 PM   #51
bmackinlay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Bill MacKinlay
Location: Dade City, Fl.
Watch: 18K Pres.DD 118238
Posts: 476
When, I had my 36mm DD, I never received a compliment on it ,now that I have the new DD II with the Ivory Concentric Dial with Arabic Numerals, people make comments like wow what a beautiful watch,or is that new? Yesterday I went to see my doctor and he said,"man, I have to get one of those"!!It is very comfortable to wear,at least IMO.I had a choice of the White Dial with Romans,but when I saw the two watches together, I chose the Ivory dial,I guess you could say "It smiled at me"! Bill
bmackinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2009, 07:26 AM   #52
RoatanMan
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Roatan
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmackinlay View Post
When, I had my 36mm DD, I never received a compliment on it ,now that I have the new DD II with the Ivory Concentric Dial with Arabic Numerals, people make comments like wow what a beautiful watch,or is that new? Yesterday I went to see my doctor and he said,"man, I have to get one of those"!!It is very comfortable to wear,at least IMO.I had a choice of the White Dial with Romans,but when I saw the two watches together, I chose the Ivory dial,I guess you could say "It smiled at me"! Bill
Nice I have the WG DDII with Ivory Roman dial on order...
RoatanMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2009, 05:14 AM   #53
casper370z
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4
what kind of discount can we see from AD?
casper370z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2009, 06:50 AM   #54
cousie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Frédéric
Location: Belgium
Watch: Rolex Skydweller
Posts: 126
Bought an everose DDII one week ago, just one word for it: fantastic!
cousie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2009, 07:40 AM   #55
propedderkustom
"TRF" Member
 
propedderkustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, AP, Patek
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by cousie View Post
Bought an everose DDII one week ago, just one word for it: fantastic!
PICS!!!
propedderkustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2009, 06:34 PM   #56
Daniel Lee
"TRF" Member
 
Daniel Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California
Watch: SS Date
Posts: 3
Maybe I seem to be a heretic, but the previous gen DD of about 1998 is superior to the new heavier 36mm model, as well as the fatso 41mm one.

The 1998 DD model 18238 costs $10,000 less than the heavier and thus less comfortable to wear current 118238, and it looks better. And how much less does it cost and weigh compared to the ugly 41mm?

Rolex, why not constantly improve the superior 18238, instead of getting rid of it and creating gaudy and overweight new models?

The Rolex board of directors and management team remind me of their counterparts at General Motors from 1970 on. GM lost focus on building the best product for their customers. Other companies filled the vacuum, and eventually GM went into bankruptcy.

GM turned the SS Malibu 396, L88 Corvette 427, and V16 Cadillac, into the Aztec, Saturn, and Escalade. The Rolex management and board is following the same path, and if allowed to continue will drive another great company to ruin in even less time.
Daniel Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2010, 02:25 PM   #57
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Excellent review !!!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2010, 09:24 AM   #58
425ranger
"TRF" Member
 
425ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Bill
Location: MI
Watch: Marathon SAR
Posts: 102
41mm in person is too big for a dress R.

IMHO
425ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 July 2011, 01:25 PM   #59
jenniferjanef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,823
Note

Just measured my dd2 lug width is 22mm. Larger than my dssd which is 21mm. I just bought my watch on Wednesday which is after the 7% price increase (1st July '11) and under the new AD no heavy discount regulation (still I managed to get a 5% off the listed price).. The model I bought is a 218206 with gem set roman (the latest addition from rolex). The roman index is much bigger than the normal dial which makes the dial looks a lot more balanced and the bezel too don't look oversized now.. Anyone can help me post a pic here? Email me ya.. jenniferjanef@gmail.com .. Cheers! .. James
jenniferjanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2011, 11:41 AM   #60
rva33145
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Ralph Valdes
Location: coral gables, fl
Watch: 18k YachtmasterMOP
Posts: 31
On the top three in my list
rva33145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.