ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

venom43 · 10 November 2013, 09:21 AM

No date for me...already have a gmt....why have 2 watches that at a glance look alike.

luvsub · 10 November 2013, 09:38 AM

Date.

jrgougeon · 10 November 2013, 11:33 AM

My no date

Presa canary · 10 November 2013, 12:04 PM

I'm married. I have to go dateless

Jack T · 10 November 2013, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolexitis

Honestly there is no wrong answer here!

So true. As much as I like my Sub, it seems everybody has a great Sub, in a so many fantastic iterations.

subtona · 10 November 2013, 12:42 PM

Nd

Trouble15 · 10 November 2013, 01:02 PM

That's a tough choice, can't go wrong with either.

rolex75216 · 10 November 2013, 01:13 PM

I think there is a market for both. I absolutely love the clean look without the date; however, I appreciate having the date function on my watch so I voted for date.

Ardalan · 10 November 2013, 06:51 PM

No date, to me it is more balanced and prettier.

finaloption · 10 November 2013, 07:12 PM

for me, sub date for modern and sub for vintage

can't go wrong with either

1William · 10 November 2013, 10:26 PM

I have both.

airchitect · 10 November 2013, 11:37 PM

I'm in agreement with one of my local AD's. Unless you just truly LOOOOOOOOVE the No-Date do not buy it. His complaint to me yesterday was that everyone he has ever had has languished in his case and he practically has to beg people to buy them. And he's not the first I've heard this from. So, if you ever think you might sell it, get a Date.

oxycon83 · 10 November 2013, 11:58 PM

No date, differentiate from the GMT and Deep-sea. N personally I like the older version without Maxi dials.

gwozhog · 11 November 2013, 12:48 AM

Date

joejoe1225 · 11 November 2013, 01:15 AM

SD - Best of both worlds and its a BEAST!!

Steve748 · 11 November 2013, 01:23 AM

According to Rolex there is no 'no date' it is either a 'Submariner' or a 'Submariner Date'....just sayin'

For me it would be a Submariner Date and I would change the crystal for one that has no cyclops!

AK797 · 11 November 2013, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve748

According to Rolex there is no 'no date' it is either a 'Submariner' or a 'Submariner Date'....just sayin'

This is a common myth. Technically they are known as the one with the blobby thing and the fake one.

cop414 · 11 November 2013, 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

This is a common myth. Technically they are known as the one with the blobby thing and the fake one.

Ouch...
All the better though to "fly under the radar"!

elcompa · 11 November 2013, 02:36 AM

I like things simple, but in this case more is better. I would go Sub w/date....and have.

GradyPhilpott · 11 November 2013, 03:54 AM

There may be many iterations, but there is only one true Submariner and it has no date.

Cc1966 · 11 November 2013, 04:00 AM

Perhaps this poll will quell the debate for a while anyways, I pefer the date on my watches, but from time to time I wear my no date Subs for their cleanness.

Gerardus · 11 November 2013, 05:08 AM

This is a no brainer for me, "date" 100%

Psmith · 11 November 2013, 06:36 AM

Date for me

With a few exceptions (fliegers and Panerais) I prefer a watch to have the date

theken · 11 November 2013, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rashid.bk

even Rolex couldn't decide so they made both.

This may be the answer.
Or:
Sub Date C 116610
and/or
Sub no date 14060

CDNWatchNut · 11 November 2013, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airchitect

I'm in agreement with one of my local AD's. Unless you just truly LOOOOOOOOVE the No-Date do not buy it. His complaint to me yesterday was that everyone he has ever had has languished in his case and he practically has to beg people to buy them. And he's not the first I've heard this from. So, if you ever think you might sell it, get a Date.

And that would be because the vast majority of buyers aren't WIS types. We know better around here.

theken · 11 November 2013, 07:34 AM

As stated above, the 16610 was much more popular than the 14060 when both were available.
Also, the 16610 was more popular than both the 16600 and the 16710.

Varmaz · 16 November 2013, 07:03 PM

No date and a 14060M.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

eeh100773 · 17 November 2013, 12:40 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jujin · 17 November 2013, 09:51 PM

I tried to wear a no date watch (speedy pro) but realized I rely on the date function too much to not have it. At the same time though I love the clean look of the no date sub. You should ask yourself if you really need the date function. If you don't need it as much is say go for nd.

Jros3484 · 26 November 2013, 05:12 AM

Date. Use it daily. ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

View Poll Results: Sub date oooor No date Sub
Date	174	49.01%
No date	181	50.99%
Voters: 355. You may not vote on this poll

10 November 2013, 09:21 AM	#61
venom43 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: NOR-CAL Watch: Grail Daytona Posts: 1,306	No date for me...already have a gmt....why have 2 watches that at a glance look alike. __________________ ROLEX:(116200)SS DATEJUST,(216570)SS EXPLORER II "POLAR",(116518-0073)YG DAYTONA,(116718)YG GMT MASTER IIc,(16610)SS SUBMARINER 50th LV,(16623)TT YACHT-MASTER ~BREITLING:SUPER OCEAN 44 ~JLC:NAVY SEALs ~OMEGA:PLANET OCEAN "LIQUIDMETAL LE" & (2201.51),SPEEEDMASTER PRO "METEORITE DIAL",SEAMASTER PRO GMT "GREAT WHITE" ~TUDOR:BLACK BAY(R)

10 November 2013, 12:42 PM	#66
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 25,995	Nd __________________

10 November 2013, 06:51 PM	#69
Ardalan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 482	No date, to me it is more balanced and prettier. __________________ My Collection: -Rolex White SS Daytona -Rolex Submariner no-date -Omega Speedmaster Moon Watch -Omega Seamaster Professional

11 November 2013, 12:48 AM	#74
gwozhog "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Point Blank, TX Posts: 2,893	Date __________________ I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right

10 November 2013, 09:38 AM	#62
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,179	Date.

10 November 2013, 11:33 AM	#63
jrgougeon "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Toronto Watch: 14060M & 1601 Posts: 180	My no date

10 November 2013, 12:04 PM	#64
Presa canary "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Justin Location: Pa Watch: Explorer ii Posts: 3,150	I'm married. I have to go dateless

10 November 2013, 01:02 PM	#67
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,852	That's a tough choice, can't go wrong with either.

10 November 2013, 01:13 PM	#68
rolex75216 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 2,008	I think there is a market for both. I absolutely love the clean look without the date; however, I appreciate having the date function on my watch so I voted for date.

10 November 2013, 07:12 PM	#70
finaloption "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Peter Location: NYC Watch: 116610LN Posts: 151	for me, sub date for modern and sub for vintage can't go wrong with either

10 November 2013, 10:26 PM	#71
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 44,731	I have both.

10 November 2013, 11:37 PM	#72
airchitect "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: KY Watch: A few..... Posts: 3,784	I'm in agreement with one of my local AD's. Unless you just truly LOOOOOOOOVE the No-Date do not buy it. His complaint to me yesterday was that everyone he has ever had has languished in his case and he practically has to beg people to buy them. And he's not the first I've heard this from. So, if you ever think you might sell it, get a Date.

10 November 2013, 11:58 PM	#73
oxycon83 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Singapore Posts: 9	No date, differentiate from the GMT and Deep-sea. N personally I like the older version without Maxi dials.

11 November 2013, 01:15 AM	#75
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	SD - Best of both worlds and its a BEAST!! __________________

11 November 2013, 01:23 AM	#76
Steve748 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: San Diego Watch: GMT2c & LVc Posts: 220	According to Rolex there is no 'no date' it is either a 'Submariner' or a 'Submariner Date'....just sayin' For me it would be a Submariner Date and I would change the crystal for one that has no cyclops!

11 November 2013, 02:36 AM	#79
elcompa "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: DD 118206 Posts: 1,857	I like things simple, but in this case more is better. I would go Sub w/date....and have.

11 November 2013, 03:54 AM	#80
GradyPhilpott 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: 116710 BLNR Posts: 34,347	There may be many iterations, but there is only one true Submariner and it has no date. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

11 November 2013, 04:00 AM	#81
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Perhaps this poll will quell the debate for a while anyways, I pefer the date on my watches, but from time to time I wear my no date Subs for their cleanness. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

11 November 2013, 05:08 AM	#82
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: EU Watch: ♕ Posts: 11,868	This is a no brainer for me, "date" 100% __________________ ♕16570 ♕126610 ♕126333

11 November 2013, 06:36 AM	#83
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Date for me With a few exceptions (fliegers and Panerais) I prefer a watch to have the date __________________

11 November 2013, 07:34 AM	#86
theken "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 3,417	As stated above, the 16610 was much more popular than the 14060 when both were available. Also, the 16610 was more popular than both the 16600 and the 16710.

16 November 2013, 07:03 PM	#87
Varmaz "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Beirut Watch: Sub 14060m Posts: 8	No date and a 14060M. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

17 November 2013, 12:40 AM	#88
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @clocksontherocks

17 November 2013, 09:51 PM	#89
jujin "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: NJ Posts: 307	I tried to wear a no date watch (speedy pro) but realized I rely on the date function too much to not have it. At the same time though I love the clean look of the no date sub. You should ask yourself if you really need the date function. If you don't need it as much is say go for nd.

26 November 2013, 05:12 AM	#90
Jros3484 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: CT Posts: 15	Date. Use it daily. ;) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)