The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 February 2015, 09:44 AM   #1
Shorty Shorty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Is the GMT 6542 caseback a replica?

Evening

Just wondering if anyone can tell me if this casebook is real or a replica? I know that the bubble back case is common, but was this style ever used?

Thanks

SS



Shorty Shorty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2015, 09:50 AM   #2
CharlieMae
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 171
That would be a YES. The entire year is never stamped only the last 2 numbers. In this case it should read 1.58

There are other issues with the fonts on the number but, the incorrect year is the dead giveaway
CharlieMae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2015, 09:58 AM   #3
Shorty Shorty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Thanks Charlie. Thought this might be the case (so to speak!).

Cheers
Shorty Shorty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2015, 10:12 AM   #4
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
I have seen this before on a 6542. I just found a link too. Now I can't say if both are fake or genuine but it's possible either way. Of course they are usually just the latter two digits, as in, 58. Still new things that confuse us pop up every day.
http://robertmaron.com/popup_image.p...&area=C&page=6
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2015, 02:56 PM   #5
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieMae View Post
That would be a YES. The entire year is never stamped only the last 2 numbers. In this case it should read 1.58

There are other issues with the fonts on the number but, the incorrect year is the dead giveaway
I have compiled a case back/serial number data sheet going back several decades. Interesting, at least to me, 1958 was the only year I observed with case backs stamped 1958. So yes, Rolex did stamp some cases 1958.


CASE BACK NUMBERS


112XXX, case back dated IV 55
223XXX, case back dated I 57
307XXX, case back dated III 57 (6538)
349XXX, case back dated I 1958
355XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
381XXX, case back dated II 1958
397XXX, case back dated III 1958 (GMT 6542)
397XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
398XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
398XXX, case back dated III 1958(GMT)6542)
427XXX, case back dated IV 1958 (GMT 6542)
488XXX, case back dated III 1958(Sub 5508)
489XXX, case back dated III 59
490XXX, case back dated III 59
503XXX, case back dated I 60 (GMT)
547XXX, case back dated II 60
577XXX, case back dated II 60
596XXX, case back dated IV 60
745XXX, case back dated II 62
87XXXX, case back dated I 63
876XXX, case back dated I 63 (GMT 1675)
990XXX, case back dated III 63
997XXX, case back dated III 63
10XXXXX, case back dated IV 63
104XXXX, case back dated IV 63
112XXXX, case back dated IV 64
11XXXXX, case back dated IV 64 (Gilt GMT 1675)
116XXXX, case back dated I 65
127XXXX, case back dated IV 64
13XXXXX, case back dated IV 65
133XXXX, case back dated I 66
134XXXX, case back dated III 66
137XXXX, case back dated I 66
140XXXX, case back dated II 66 (gilt GMT)
14XXXXX, case back dated II 66
142XXXX, case back dated IV 65 (Gilt GMT sold 9/67)
15XXXXX, case back dated VI 66 (model 1016, 6th qtr)
15XXXXX, case back dated VI 66 (model 6466, 6th qtr)
16XXXXX, case back dated II 67 (GMT, Mark I dial)
160XXXX, case back dated II 67
163XXXX, case back dated II 67 (one owner GMT full set)
164XXXX, case back dated II 67
168XXXX, case back dated II 67
17XXXXX, case back dated IV 67
171XXXX, case back dated IV 67
177XXXX, case back dated IV 67 (Sub 5513)
180XXXX, case back dated I 68
182XXXX, case back dated II 67
182XXXX, case back dated IV 67
183XXXX, case back dated I 68
185XXXX, case back dated IV 67
1852XXX, case back dated I 68
188XXXX, case back dated I 68
18XXXXX, case back dated I 68
18XXXXX, case back dated III 68
19XXXXX, case back dated III 68
19XXXXX, case back dated IV 68
19XXXXX, case back dated IV 68
194XXXX, case back dated IV 68
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2015, 12:06 AM   #6
nsumner
"TRF" Member
 
nsumner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I have compiled a case back/serial number data sheet going back several decades. Interesting, at least to me, 1958 was the only year I observed with case backs stamped 1958. So yes, Rolex did stamp some cases 1958.


CASE BACK NUMBERS


112XXX, case back dated IV 55
223XXX, case back dated I 57
307XXX, case back dated III 57 (6538)
349XXX, case back dated I 1958
355XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
381XXX, case back dated II 1958
397XXX, case back dated III 1958 (GMT 6542)
397XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
398XXX, case back dated II 1958 (GMT 6542)
398XXX, case back dated III 1958(GMT)6542)
427XXX, case back dated IV 1958 (GMT 6542)
488XXX, case back dated III 1958(Sub 5508)
489XXX, case back dated III 59
490XXX, case back dated III 59
503XXX, case back dated I 60 (GMT)
547XXX, case back dated II 60
577XXX, case back dated II 60
596XXX, case back dated IV 60
745XXX, case back dated II 62
87XXXX, case back dated I 63
876XXX, case back dated I 63 (GMT 1675)
990XXX, case back dated III 63
997XXX, case back dated III 63
10XXXXX, case back dated IV 63
104XXXX, case back dated IV 63
112XXXX, case back dated IV 64
11XXXXX, case back dated IV 64 (Gilt GMT 1675)
116XXXX, case back dated I 65
127XXXX, case back dated IV 64
13XXXXX, case back dated IV 65
133XXXX, case back dated I 66
134XXXX, case back dated III 66
137XXXX, case back dated I 66
140XXXX, case back dated II 66 (gilt GMT)
14XXXXX, case back dated II 66
142XXXX, case back dated IV 65 (Gilt GMT sold 9/67)
15XXXXX, case back dated VI 66 (model 1016, 6th qtr)
15XXXXX, case back dated VI 66 (model 6466, 6th qtr)
16XXXXX, case back dated II 67 (GMT, Mark I dial)
160XXXX, case back dated II 67
163XXXX, case back dated II 67 (one owner GMT full set)
164XXXX, case back dated II 67
168XXXX, case back dated II 67
17XXXXX, case back dated IV 67
171XXXX, case back dated IV 67
177XXXX, case back dated IV 67 (Sub 5513)
180XXXX, case back dated I 68
182XXXX, case back dated II 67
182XXXX, case back dated IV 67
183XXXX, case back dated I 68
185XXXX, case back dated IV 67
1852XXX, case back dated I 68
188XXXX, case back dated I 68
18XXXXX, case back dated I 68
18XXXXX, case back dated III 68
19XXXXX, case back dated III 68
19XXXXX, case back dated IV 68
19XXXXX, case back dated IV 68
194XXXX, case back dated IV 68

Extremely interesting
nsumner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2015, 01:34 AM   #7
marcello pisani
"TRF" Member
 
marcello pisani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
digits in the back-inside are very odd and also back shape is quite unusual ( looks to have a " 5508 " style ).
my advice : just run away !
PS : " 1958 " is usually punched with 4 digits so this is not a problem for the present back.
marcello pisani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2015, 11:03 PM   #8
TimeToGo
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcello pisani View Post
digits in the back-inside are very odd and also back shape is quite unusual ( looks to have a " 5508 " style ).
my advice : just run away !
PS : " 1958 " is usually punched with 4 digits so this is not a problem for the present back.
Indeed!

Here is a pic from one of Jacek's post..
.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg f.jpg (61.0 KB, 124 views)
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2015, 11:05 PM   #9
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
I find the "E" letter inside the case strange, isn't it usually short E's?
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2015, 11:10 PM   #10
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
looks dodgy to me
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.