ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TheRolexKingofLV · 23 March 2017, 05:19 AM

This watch is gorgeous

Definitely on my radar

EDL7 · 23 March 2017, 05:52 AM

Dial too busy...
Useless/dumb spinning moonphase..
And I like Cellinis in general..
But for 25K...lol..
DOA..
Just buy the Lange...

osamu · 23 March 2017, 06:54 AM

Very nice, but I agree would be hard to buy this over brands known for their dress watches in the same price range.

77T · 23 March 2017, 07:04 AM

Well for that price, glad I'd get a moonphase correction tool...

The Joker · 23 March 2017, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

Well for that price, glad I'd get a moonphase correction tool...

Is that tool in gold?

I need that in my life.

watchwatcher · 23 March 2017, 08:11 AM

Good looking watch. I'm more of a sports/bracelet guy, so the appeal is limited for me, but I can see the attraction this watch will have for many...although with a 26k price tag, that will most likely limit the actual buyer pool.

Los · 23 March 2017, 08:50 AM

Love it

KrismanX · 23 March 2017, 08:56 AM

It's pretty..expensive.

Maxy · 23 March 2017, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adnjoo

New Rolex Cellini Moonphase

Specs: 39mm, 18 ct Everose gold, calibre 3195, PR 48 hours.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKq...ature=youtu.be

Best part?? No 'Cellini' name on the dial!!

Horology.life · 23 March 2017, 09:05 AM

fantastic piece, very interesting.
very well done.

subtona · 23 March 2017, 09:08 AM

I Just can't loook to Rolex for this type of watch.

rw2008 · 23 March 2017, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

I Just can't loook to Rolex for this type of watch.

Yep...and especially not at 25k

droptopman · 23 March 2017, 01:58 PM

Really like this one. Beautiful watch. The moon phase set up is a little weird...but it certainly looks great.

vladamir15 · 23 March 2017, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Joker

Is that tool in gold?

I need that in my life.

If that tool is in gold then it would be a nice collector's item type thing. It would help somewhat to explain the price. But i still don't think it justifies it.

ansharma · 23 March 2017, 03:54 PM

At this price - why would you choose this over a Lange 1 Moonphase? (preowned). There is absolutely no comparison in terms of who creates a better watch.

Gharddog03 · 23 March 2017, 04:12 PM

Damn fine looking watch.

77T · 23 March 2017, 09:59 PM

In noodling around the interwebs for moon phase exemplars, I came across this:

Back in Feb. 2015, this watch was predicted by Monochrome - it never happened then - but I think the 2017 reality could have been implemented with the moonphase window as Monochrome illustrated it for their article...judging by some of the comments here it may have been better. Maybe not off to the right side of the dial - and not with the date subdial - but with the moon phase window you'll see here.

https://monochrome-watches.com/rolex...ches-hope-see/

Monochrome image - not a real Rolex

There are differences like a perpetual calendar and the Cellini brand but... What if Rolex had used the traditional moon phase window you see above? Wouldn't that have helped simplify the confusing instructions for people living in the Southern Hemisphere?

benlee · 23 March 2017, 11:19 PM

Very nice watch. But over-priced. Is there good discount for Cellini range?

GB-man · 23 March 2017, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benlee

Very nice watch. But over-priced. Is there good discount for Cellini range?

I would think so...

peterskinner · 23 March 2017, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collarcity

Rough year when a Cellini is the highlight of the Rolex booth.

I take your point, but the modern Cellini watches are superb, and neglected on the forums. This may be heresy, but I prefer the Cellini dual-time, rose gold, to the Day Date 40. And I have had both.
The moon-phase version just advances the cause. Interestingly, I was at my ADs on Saturday, and two customers were buying Cellini watches.
Btw: an easy 10% discount is available, probably more to a good negotiator.

EDL7 · 24 March 2017, 02:09 AM

That fantasy Cellini mockup...is killer..

HogwldFLTR · 24 March 2017, 02:31 AM

Absolutely a striking watch though not for me. Moon phase though interesting is relatively irrelevant imho. I'm drawn but not that much at 26K. Too many other watches I'd want first for that money.

AndyWright · 24 March 2017, 02:46 AM

Very interesting moonphase complication. I like the display of the lunar cycle. :-)

behardt · 24 March 2017, 03:43 AM

This darn thing is growing on me...

77T · 24 March 2017, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyWright

Very interesting moonphase complication. I like the display of the lunar cycle. :-)

Did you know that if you travel to the Southern Hemisphere hat you must read that moonphase dial in opposite phase? (Except Full &a New)

vladamir15 · 24 March 2017, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

Did you know that if you travel to the Southern Hemisphere hat you must read that moonphase dial in opposite phase? (Except Full &a New)

Doesn't seem like that big of an issue to me

bjw · 24 March 2017, 07:43 AM

But it doesnt actually show the moon phases! No waxing. No waning. It just spins around.

Hey, people, pssst.....the Emperor has no clothes!

bjw · 24 March 2017, 07:46 AM

If you have to include a diagram of how to interpret the phases of the moon on a moon-phase watch, ya kinda failed at the delivery. Especially at $26,000.

77T · 24 March 2017, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bjw

If you have to include a diagram of how to interpret the phases of the moon on a moon-phase watch, ya kinda failed at the delivery. Especially at $26,000.

Yeah - pretty much...

77T · 24 March 2017, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vladamir15

Doesn't seem like that big of an issue to me

It isn't really...I have a Grandfather Clock with moonphase - it was correct for exactly one month. It's first month in our home.

But my point was actually about the poor implementation when all other brands have a better moonphase window.

23 March 2017, 05:19 AM	#61
TheRolexKingofLV "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Trace Location: Vegas/Bay Area Posts: 9,234	This watch is gorgeous Definitely on my radar __________________ Official Host "The Penthouse Party" Las Vegas 2018 Instagram @tracenunes

23 March 2017, 08:56 AM	#68
KrismanX "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Kristofer Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: my feet. Posts: 2,364	It's pretty..expensive. __________________ No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014

23 March 2017, 09:05 AM	#70
Horology.life "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: U.K Posts: 677	fantastic piece, very interesting. very well done. __________________ Rolex/Tudor/AP/VC/Panerai

23 March 2017, 09:08 AM	#71
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 25,996	I Just can't loook to Rolex for this type of watch. __________________

23 March 2017, 01:58 PM	#73
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	Really like this one. Beautiful watch. The moon phase set up is a little weird...but it certainly looks great. __________________ Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height.

23 March 2017, 05:52 AM	#62
EDL7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: USA Posts: 842	Dial too busy... Useless/dumb spinning moonphase.. And I like Cellinis in general.. But for 25K...lol.. DOA.. Just buy the Lange...

23 March 2017, 06:54 AM	#63
osamu "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Honolulu Posts: 1,322	Very nice, but I agree would be hard to buy this over brands known for their dress watches in the same price range.

23 March 2017, 08:11 AM	#66
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,479	Good looking watch. I'm more of a sports/bracelet guy, so the appeal is limited for me, but I can see the attraction this watch will have for many...although with a 26k price tag, that will most likely limit the actual buyer pool.

23 March 2017, 08:50 AM	#67
Los "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Albuquerque Watch: 116610 Sub C Posts: 14	Love it

23 March 2017, 03:54 PM	#75
ansharma "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: UK Watch: Lange 1 Moonphase Posts: 1,744	At this price - why would you choose this over a Lange 1 Moonphase? (preowned). There is absolutely no comparison in terms of who creates a better watch.

23 March 2017, 04:12 PM	#76
Gharddog03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Genaro Location: Fresno Ca. Watch: R O L E X Posts: 4,466	Damn fine looking watch.

23 March 2017, 09:59 PM	#77
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,725	New Rolex Cellini Moonphase In noodling around the interwebs for moon phase exemplars, I came across this: Back in Feb. 2015, this watch was predicted by Monochrome - it never happened then - but I think the 2017 reality could have been implemented with the moonphase window as Monochrome illustrated it for their article...judging by some of the comments here it may have been better. Maybe not off to the right side of the dial - and not with the date subdial - but with the moon phase window you'll see here. https://monochrome-watches.com/rolex...ches-hope-see/ Monochrome image - not a real Rolex Monochrome image - not a real Rolex There are differences like a perpetual calendar and the Cellini brand but... What if Rolex had used the traditional moon phase window you see above? Wouldn't that have helped simplify the confusing instructions for people living in the Southern Hemisphere? __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

23 March 2017, 11:19 PM	#78
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,873	Very nice watch. But over-priced. Is there good discount for Cellini range? __________________ Follow me on Instagram : benlee789

24 March 2017, 02:09 AM	#81
EDL7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: USA Posts: 842	That fantasy Cellini mockup...is killer..

24 March 2017, 02:31 AM	#82
HogwldFLTR 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: What's on my wrist Posts: 33,256	Absolutely a striking watch though not for me. Moon phase though interesting is relatively irrelevant imho. I'm drawn but not that much at 26K. Too many other watches I'd want first for that money. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

24 March 2017, 02:46 AM	#83
AndyWright "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: Andy Location: London Watch: Rolex Deepsea Posts: 560	Very interesting moonphase complication. I like the display of the lunar cycle. :-)

24 March 2017, 03:43 AM	#84
behardt "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Yoda Location: USA Posts: 468	This darn thing is growing on me... __________________ "The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker." Voltaire

24 March 2017, 07:43 AM	#87
bjw "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: USA Posts: 440	But it doesnt actually show the moon phases! No waxing. No waning. It just spins around. Hey, people, pssst.....the Emperor has no clothes! __________________ 116710 BLNR 16710 COKE Tudor 7922R Tudor 79220N Tudor 79260P Panda "Opinions are like wrist watches, everyone's shows different time from the other. But all believe that theirs is accurate. "

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)