ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 May 2016, 03:46 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
If you take the best Pateks, talking 400K or more, they are perfect, but the cheaper ones clearly have very little which is hand made, I still think that the 5711/5712/5167R for less than 40k are some of the finest watches you can get at this price, but many other brands are as good or better depending on the price segment and type of watch you want, Greubel Forsey, Lange, RM, Voutilainen, the list is endless really and depends on your tastes and needs, let's say I really like these 4
|
29 May 2016, 05:48 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Earth
Watch: 5575
Posts: 1,674
|
Loaded question...in their segment Patek is unparalleled
Compared to independents no but you have to compare apples with apples |
29 May 2016, 07:02 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
My most favourite Independent marques
__________________
|
29 May 2016, 07:21 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
|
|
29 May 2016, 07:23 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
^^*^^^^^^^
Would be great to know👍🏻 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
29 May 2016, 07:29 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
|
|
29 May 2016, 08:02 PM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ZRH
Posts: 1,209
|
Limited to watches?
Agreed, in a subjective way nearly impossible to answer imo Quote:
I would stick to modern stuff and vote Porsche because I can drive that clock. Older brands? The now defunct VOC, founded around 1602 (dissolved 1799). They actually had a patent/protected licence and minted their own currency. I dont know any brand tpday that can match that! At its heighday universally recognized, acclaimed and feared, they employed 25000-30000 people. Also the first known branded company to feature double accounting/book keeping for tax avoidance. |
|
29 May 2016, 11:06 PM | #38 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,909
|
I know this is a Rolex Forum and many times we fall into putting Rolex first but the answer is subjective to many factors. Build, workmanship, innovation, materials, price, etc. My answer is Rolex is the best for me, based on all of the factors listed by others. Not to mention everything dealing with price and the ability to have the watch serviced in a timely manner. I know that many hold up specific models inside a brand as better and I would give you that point. But this is a brand issue not a model issue inside the brand. And as it is each of our own personal opinions there is no overall better brand than Rolex in my opinion. Just my thoughts.
|
29 May 2016, 11:09 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2016, 12:02 AM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,878
|
Yes I think rolex is a superior BRAND, by a long shot. That has little to do with the finishing or movement design etc I also think where patek beats ALS, FPJ, Breguet is BRAND
|
30 May 2016, 12:22 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
Cogitating on this. I think we missing the point. We think brand equates to the best watch. Hence why I mentioned the independents. But as a brand I think there are only 2. Rolex and PP. Most people would know them and I guess in USA more Rolex. If not then I will vote Apple, Coca Cola, MacDonalds etc
|
30 May 2016, 01:14 AM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,661
|
|
30 May 2016, 01:27 AM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
|
30 May 2016, 01:42 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,022
|
Many comments about dufour...
After a quick study, what I find is a total of 3 offerings, two of which do not appeal to me at all, the other is "the simplicity" which to me is absolutely a beautiful balanced and amazing watch... Perfect design For a visually similar looking offering and I'm guessing price point Patek offers the 5078 minute repeater. in platinum with a case and movement that has much more detail. To me, the movement of the dufour has the base plate cnc machined and looks similar in construction to a panerai finished eta. The dufour is of course finished much nicer than the panerai (I apologize for the comparison) but at a glance that is what I think of. And as pointed out, dufour is 34mm and virtually unavailable to the masses... How can it compete here?
__________________
|
30 May 2016, 01:52 AM | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:00 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,022
|
Quote:
Of course Rolex is Rolex there is reasons more than the name that a ~million watches per year are sold
__________________
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:02 AM | #47 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
By being gorgeous, hand-made, better-finished, and way way way more exclusive, that's how. I'd take a Dufour Simplicity over virtually any current or recent PP in a heartbeat. Same goes for FPJ.
|
30 May 2016, 02:09 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,022
|
Quote:
I don't know that the simplicity is current so have you considered the vintage out of production models from both groups? 34mm? I could keep it on a shelf under glass to look at it, for me it would be too small to wear. This brings us to my earlier point we have to place our own value on what is important to us, Keeping in mind some of your reasons may not be correct as I have written above.
__________________
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:16 AM | #49 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
Quote:
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:17 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,022
|
Fair point
__________________
|
30 May 2016, 02:18 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
Philippe
|
30 May 2016, 02:18 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:19 AM | #53 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
One thing we can agree on is that we all like different things, and that makes the world a bit more interesting.
|
30 May 2016, 02:23 AM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
|
30 May 2016, 02:25 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
I don't own one but met an owner at a dinner party in Milan a few years ago who was wearing one. The host introduced us and also happened to be a watch collector and had a loupe handy. What struck me was the minimalism - no excess decoration or frills - almost zenlike. The loupe revealed an attention to detail that I had not seen before on any watch. Maybe these days Ferrier comes close, but without a side by side it would be hard to say.
|
30 May 2016, 02:30 AM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
Eric Ku should be called Eric Kuuuuuul!
|
30 May 2016, 02:43 AM | #57 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
That's done it!! I am a heathen...whilst there is something wonderful knowing that a single master worked on that time piece along with the rarity should make me weak at the knees. It doesn't...beautiful yes...34 mm... Even the dial seems to be outsourced at least the PP says enamel!!! OK string me up.......but for me it's the PP it's absolutely gorgeous and forget the minute repeater
|
30 May 2016, 02:48 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
I don't think the dial of simplicity is outsourced.
Edit - I'm wrong again. |
30 May 2016, 02:55 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 500
|
I think there's some small independents like Philippe Dufour that are slightly superior given their individual artistry and attention to each piece but those are far more difficult to acquire.
|
30 May 2016, 03:11 AM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.