The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 May 2016, 01:41 PM   #1
kentheevil
"TRF" Member
 
kentheevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Ken Kelvins
Location: bkk
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 586
Ap panda serie G should I get it?

So I'm really considering getting an Roo panda serie G it's definitely a beauty. I was considering getting the new grey dial but It's more because of the little upgrade like the caseback and ceramic button but I start thinking that it's still the same movement so my main concern now is if I get the series G panda is it considered too old? Will it be fine to swim or if it happens to get wet or what should be concern of? Do you guys think i should rather get the newer models?

And is there any different between serie g and other newer series? Please help



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kentheevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2016, 02:17 PM   #2
eal15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Everett
Location: GTA, Canada
Watch: Audemars Piguet 15
Posts: 789
New model with ceramic pushers and crown.


Thanks,
Everett
AP 15710 Diver
Sent from my iPhone
eal15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2016, 02:50 PM   #3
lpolito415
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Loren
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, AP
Posts: 224
My vote is the newer model.
lpolito415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2016, 03:03 PM   #4
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
I'll take the grey dial, case back and ceramic buttons any day of the week over the old model, very nice as well but these 3 major upgrades, not little as you stated, are clearly worth it IMHO
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2016, 09:12 PM   #5
Ahmadq87
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Doha
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 141
Go with the new model
Ahmadq87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2016, 10:11 PM   #6
RHIII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
I'd go with the newer model


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RHIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 04:02 AM   #7
Luv rolex
2024 Pledge Member
 
Luv rolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Islam
Location: Montreal, Canada
Watch: DJ,SD 4000,LV
Posts: 742
But guys, iam in the same boat as the OP exactly even in the models. But don't you think the gray theme will take hit in resale value after the new movement introduced.
__________________
current: ROO elephant, ROO 44 panda, datejust 16013, omega const. day date
Sold: Gmt 16710, sub 16610LV, SD 16600, SD 4000, sub c 116610,sub c 116613, Daytona116503 , ROO navy, ROO vampire, omega seamaster
Luv rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 04:18 AM   #8
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luv rolex View Post
But guys, iam in the same boat as the OP exactly even in the models. But don't you think the gray theme will take hit in resale value after the new movement introduced.
AP is pretty good about not killing current or previous models when they roll out upgrades. Like they didn't out ceramic bezels on the 42mms.

If I was AP I would roll out the new chrono in the Jules audemars and ROC line first because those have non-Inhouse movements. The 3126 has the inhouse base 3120 movement with DD modual. The DNA of the ROO has always had the modular movement and since the base movement is inhouse that would be the last series I would put the new chrono movement in. If the new chrono went in the ROO I would expect a price increase as well. Better margin for AP and value retention for current watches.
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 10:51 AM   #9
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
I prefer the newer one
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:48 AM   #10
waisoserious
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 116515LN, 126621
Posts: 180
Panda, I LOVE the Panda. The Elephant was always kinda mehhh to me. If I were considering a newer model I'd get the Navy.
waisoserious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 01:20 PM   #11
APAP
"TRF" Member
 
APAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
I think the panda is one of most beautiful ROO's out there, but then I may be biased. The contrast is really nice. The grey one is kind of dull and gets boring really fast, imho.

APAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 02:00 PM   #12
daytonaTBR
"TRF" Member
 
daytonaTBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
go for the new model imo
daytonaTBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 02:16 PM   #13
SamGMT
"TRF" Member
 
SamGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Singapore
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 1,689
For me, Panda!
SamGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 03:39 PM   #14
alexlt730512
"TRF" Member
 
alexlt730512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,245
go with newer model if money is not a big issue.
alexlt730512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 05:01 PM   #15
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
Newer isn't always better.

I like the bottom hour dial of the Panda compared to the newer models such as the elephant. Look at the hour positioning and the lines from the center.

The newer one isn't as nice.

Ceramic pushers are nice and the case back... Honestly, doesn't sway me one bit.

The contrasting dial on the panda is awesome.
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 09:16 AM   #16
riods007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 96
The classic panda pops!
riods007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2016, 02:42 AM   #17
FTE2014
"TRF" Member
 
FTE2014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Tim
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5712&5167&5130G
Posts: 221
For me the discontinued Panda on a stainless steel bracelet is the most beautiful incarnation of the ROO line, followed by the discontinued black ceramic diver...
FTE2014 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2016, 06:42 PM   #18
mickyd329
"TRF" Member
 
mickyd329's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Socal
Watch: AP/PP/Rolex
Posts: 1,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by singe89 View Post
AP is pretty good about not killing current or previous models when they roll out upgrades. Like they didn't out ceramic bezels on the 42mms.

If I was AP I would roll out the new chrono in the Jules audemars and ROC line first because those have non-Inhouse movements. The 3126 has the inhouse base 3120 movement with DD modual. The DNA of the ROO has always had the modular movement and since the base movement is inhouse that would be the last series I would put the new chrono movement in. If the new chrono went in the ROO I would expect a price increase as well. Better margin for AP and value retention for current watches.
Totally agree.
mickyd329 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2016, 09:07 PM   #19
dieter1403
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 19
I have a few APs incl BB, but Panda is classic and you can't go wrong. On black hornback with with or red stitches or bracelet



Sent from my iPhone
dieter1403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2016, 02:19 AM   #20
kentheevil
"TRF" Member
 
kentheevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Ken Kelvins
Location: bkk
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieter1403 View Post
I have a few APs incl BB, but Panda is classic and you can't go wrong. On black hornback with with or red stitches or bracelet



Sent from my iPhone
Thanks a lot that's a beauty I was worried about the panda being released for a while but well since, the service center is still there and it's the same movement I shouldn't worry especially when it's that nice !
Quote:
Originally Posted by riods007 View Post
The classic panda pops!
True first I was so getting the elephant untill I saw the panda hahahaha
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTE2014 View Post
For me the discontinued Panda on a stainless steel bracelet is the most beautiful incarnation of the ROO line, followed by the discontinued black ceramic diver...
Exactly ! it's so beautiful I start to tell myself I dont need the crystal caseback or other upgrades !
Quote:
Originally Posted by VICI View Post
Newer isn't always better.

I like the bottom hour dial of the Panda compared to the newer models such as the elephant. Look at the hour positioning and the lines from the center.

The newer one isn't as nice.

Ceramic pushers are nice and the case back... Honestly, doesn't sway me one bit.

The contrasting dial on the panda is awesome.
Thanks actually I gotta admit that all roo got me elephant, new black panda, but then when I saw the classic panda damn it's a beauty and starting to forget the upgrade thinking about save the different for extra strap
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamGMT View Post
For me, Panda!
Quote:
Originally Posted by APAP View Post
I think the panda is one of most beautiful ROO's out there, but then I may be biased. The contrast is really nice. The grey one is kind of dull and gets boring really fast, imho.

Thanks sir you make it easier for me
kentheevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2016, 12:48 AM   #21
ec00421
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 513
As much as I love Panda (imo it has the nicest dial of the offshore range), i think the upgrades, namely the ceramic hardware and the crystal back alongside a couple of other modifications, are worthing going for.
ec00421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2016, 02:33 AM   #22
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,747
Go for the newer model with the ceramic pushers. It's too good to pass on.
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2016, 11:48 AM   #23
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,187
Panda rocks
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2016, 11:51 AM   #24
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,997
love the panda.

after owning a couple of SS AP's, a ceramic bezel seems like a good idea… low and behold, they also make a panda with a ceramic bezel :)
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 05:13 AM   #25
GolfPunk
"TRF" Member
 
GolfPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,395
Ap panda serie G should I get it?

I was just in the exact same boat and went for the 42mm ROO 26170 'G' series.

Same exact movement, I love the look of both but I bought mine for £7000 less than the 44mm ceramic. No brainer for me.



__________________
♕ Rolex DateJust 1601 Buckley
Birth Year 1972 ♕
Breitling Chronomat 47 mm GMT Limited
GolfPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.