ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 October 2020, 03:50 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
The only Rolex sport watches that fit me anymore are the Daytona and Explorer... May be the GMT with the jubilee bracelet.
Rolex should leave these the way there are. Explorer, in particular, have people are already complaining that it went from a 36mm to 39mm... imagine 41mm. No thank you. The current size is the best proportions as a modern variant. |
27 October 2020, 03:51 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: London, UK
Posts: 14
|
Nope. For me 39 is perfect. Would consider going a little smaller but definitely not bigger.
|
27 October 2020, 04:19 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London, UK
Posts: 159
|
Nope for me - 39 is the perfect size
|
27 October 2020, 04:31 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: California
Watch: out!
Posts: 155
|
I'll be the odd one out here, but I have been waiting to buy an explorer in hopes it goes to 41mm!
|
27 October 2020, 05:05 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
That's a 100% positive no! Larger would be a mistake, going the other direction to a 37mm would actually be better even.
|
27 October 2020, 05:31 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,205
|
No way! I enjoy my 214270. But I think it would be better at 37-38.
|
27 October 2020, 05:34 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
|
Not a chance. 36 is a tad too small, 38 would be the perfect size, but if it went to 41 I would lol
Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk |
27 October 2020, 05:36 AM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 90
|
im gonna go against the grain here. If they release a 41m Explorer I am going to scoop that up in a heart beat
|
27 October 2020, 08:27 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
41 would be too large esp as it’s all dial.
Love my 214270 mk2. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
27 October 2020, 08:29 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 323
|
For an idea of how a 41 Explorer would look, consider the (discontinued) Tudor Heritage Ranger (41), or the North Flag (40) - both too big, in my opinion, when I saw them in person.
|
27 October 2020, 08:32 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, PP, Lange
Posts: 1,024
|
not really, same reason as why I dislike the new OP41 because it looks too big
|
27 October 2020, 08:33 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 650
|
That’s exactly why I am waiting 2021 and hoping for the upgrade! Since I have 7 3/4” wrist 39mm is definitely too small!
My AD called me and said to swing by and I did. It ia a beautiful watch don’t get me wrong but when I put it on, I changed my mind! Way too small! |
27 October 2020, 08:41 AM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
|
It depends on its “new” 41mm case and shape. So a big Maybe after trying it on and see if it retained its proportions. However, given the current trend of overall slowdown of inflated watches, I would doubt that we will see 41mm anytime soon.
|
27 October 2020, 08:45 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Real Name: Chad
Location: MI
Posts: 86
|
No. 39mm is great IMO.
I love my Explorer, but do miss the date function sometimes. Would Rolex ever release an Explorer date? |
27 October 2020, 09:58 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: Explorer 39, SeaQ
Posts: 859
|
No way. I’ve got an 8 1/2” wrist and I love the 39mm size. If I wanted bigger I’d look at something else but this Explorer with its big dial is perfect.
|
27 October 2020, 10:08 AM | #46 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
|
Nope. 39mm is perfect for my modern explorer 214270, 36mm for my 1016. would not be interested in larger
|
27 October 2020, 10:22 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,824
|
No. I've tried on the Explorer 39, and it's about max for my 6.76 wrist.
__________________
. Sub No Date (14060); Hamilton field; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak. |
27 October 2020, 10:41 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I expect it will happen eventually, and perhaps a white dial option as well.
__________________
|
27 October 2020, 11:13 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: OC/Ca
Posts: 320
|
Not! 41 would ruin it.
|
27 October 2020, 11:35 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,133
|
|
27 October 2020, 11:51 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: texas
Watch: 126610 LV
Posts: 1,529
|
No
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk |
27 October 2020, 01:07 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
|
No. As some have mentioned above, I’d buy a new one if it came in 36mm.
__________________
Rolex Only Please |
27 October 2020, 04:04 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Land of OZ
Posts: 1,411
|
I hope they re-release the 36mm.
|
27 October 2020, 04:06 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
No way! I already think 39mm is max to keep its classic shape and look, so def a no at any bigger.
|
27 October 2020, 05:13 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: London
Posts: 16
|
Yes. I think 40mm would be perfect, but 41 would be good too.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.