The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 October 2020, 03:50 AM   #31
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
The only Rolex sport watches that fit me anymore are the Daytona and Explorer... May be the GMT with the jubilee bracelet.

Rolex should leave these the way there are.

Explorer, in particular, have people are already complaining that it went from a 36mm to 39mm... imagine 41mm. No thank you.

The current size is the best proportions as a modern variant.
2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 03:51 AM   #32
Lantenac06
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: London, UK
Posts: 14
Nope. For me 39 is perfect. Would consider going a little smaller but definitely not bigger.
Lantenac06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 04:19 AM   #33
jrox
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London, UK
Posts: 159
Nope for me - 39 is the perfect size
jrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 04:31 AM   #34
mrockperez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: California
Watch: out!
Posts: 155
I'll be the odd one out here, but I have been waiting to buy an explorer in hopes it goes to 41mm!
mrockperez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 05:05 AM   #35
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
That's a 100% positive no! Larger would be a mistake, going the other direction to a 37mm would actually be better even.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 05:31 AM   #36
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,205
No way! I enjoy my 214270. But I think it would be better at 37-38.
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 05:34 AM   #37
Heady Topper
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 321
Not a chance. 36 is a tad too small, 38 would be the perfect size, but if it went to 41 I would lol

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
Heady Topper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 05:36 AM   #38
mito818
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 90
im gonna go against the grain here. If they release a 41m Explorer I am going to scoop that up in a heart beat
mito818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:27 AM   #39
drblowfin
"TRF" Member
 
drblowfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 98
41 would be too large esp as it’s all dial.
Love my 214270 mk2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
drblowfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:29 AM   #40
Fred48
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 323
For an idea of how a 41 Explorer would look, consider the (discontinued) Tudor Heritage Ranger (41), or the North Flag (40) - both too big, in my opinion, when I saw them in person.
Fred48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:32 AM   #41
jerryguo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, PP, Lange
Posts: 1,024
not really, same reason as why I dislike the new OP41 because it looks too big
jerryguo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:33 AM   #42
Nodzex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 650
That’s exactly why I am waiting 2021 and hoping for the upgrade! Since I have 7 3/4” wrist 39mm is definitely too small!
My AD called me and said to swing by and I did. It ia a beautiful watch don’t get me wrong but when I put it on, I changed my mind! Way too small!
Nodzex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:41 AM   #43
polaris72
2024 Pledge Member
 
polaris72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
It depends on its “new” 41mm case and shape. So a big Maybe after trying it on and see if it retained its proportions. However, given the current trend of overall slowdown of inflated watches, I would doubt that we will see 41mm anytime soon.
polaris72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:45 AM   #44
wrx04
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Real Name: Chad
Location: MI
Posts: 86
No. 39mm is great IMO.

I love my Explorer, but do miss the date function sometimes. Would Rolex ever release an Explorer date?
wrx04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:58 AM   #45
Jerrocop
"TRF" Member
 
Jerrocop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: Explorer 39, SeaQ
Posts: 859
No way. I’ve got an 8 1/2” wrist and I love the 39mm size. If I wanted bigger I’d look at something else but this Explorer with its big dial is perfect.
Jerrocop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:08 AM   #46
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Nope. 39mm is perfect for my modern explorer 214270, 36mm for my 1016. would not be interested in larger
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:22 AM   #47
NachoNeal
"TRF" Member
 
NachoNeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,824
No. I've tried on the Explorer 39, and it's about max for my 6.76 wrist.
__________________
.
Sub No Date (14060); Hamilton field; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak.
NachoNeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 10:41 AM   #48
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
I expect it will happen eventually, and perhaps a white dial option as well.
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 11:13 AM   #49
2bigalow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: OC/Ca
Posts: 320
Not! 41 would ruin it.
2bigalow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 11:35 AM   #50
TimeAZ
"TRF" Member
 
TimeAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMarcus View Post
No way! I enjoy my 214270. But I think it would be better at 37-38.
Could not agree more. 37 would be awesome.
TimeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 11:51 AM   #51
dnpina
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: texas
Watch: 126610 LV
Posts: 1,529
No

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
dnpina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 01:07 PM   #52
Beckster
"TRF" Member
 
Beckster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
No. As some have mentioned above, I’d buy a new one if it came in 36mm.
__________________
Rolex Only Please
Beckster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 04:04 PM   #53
SkyJuice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Land of OZ
Posts: 1,411
I hope they re-release the 36mm.
SkyJuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 04:06 PM   #54
importstunna
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
No way! I already think 39mm is max to keep its classic shape and look, so def a no at any bigger.
importstunna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 05:13 PM   #55
Game&Watch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: London
Posts: 16
Yes. I think 40mm would be perfect, but 41 would be good too.
Game&Watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.