ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 September 2017, 11:18 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
|
Quote:
That said, these PP complications are on "application", meaning that they have to be vetted by PP and then some time waiting. If they don't already own a number of PPs, I would hazard a guess that being approved for one of these pieces is low. |
|
30 September 2017, 01:02 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
I have my dream watches, but actually buying one is probably a bit different from just dreaming about it.
Like I always thought in that price range, I would want something like the ALS Zeitwerk Striking Time, but I'm not sure it's worth the extra costs over a normal Zeitwerk. A perpetual calendar sounds interesting, but I just feel like I'd be so scared of letting in run down, it might ruin the experience for me. I think I might just try and get a 40th anniversary Nautilus 5976 and be happy. |
30 September 2017, 02:49 PM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
And of course I agree if value retention is obligatory go PP, if exclusivity and under the radar are, then R Smith or Voutilainen |
|
30 September 2017, 03:06 PM | #34 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,898
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
30 September 2017, 03:34 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
|
I feel like personality/age/daily attire will define this purchase.
If the buyer is on the younger side and not wearing suits, I could see RM being a great acquisition. If not, I suspect this will end up being a nice PP purchase for much less than 300 EUR.
__________________
Watches! |
30 September 2017, 04:07 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,898
|
Not unusual that the first answer is the best answer.
Just sayin
__________________
|
30 September 2017, 04:36 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Yes the 5078P is a great watch and under the radar for sure, but for 300k I think I would do things differently, if you have 300k to spend and are not a compulsive flipper like many here, I would definitely go for a bespoke piece, having a watch that no one in the world had or will have is really a special feeling, and as much as resale in Roger Smith or Voutilainen watches might give you a bath, who knows what the future holds flr those pieces, not that I want to sell mine one day, Inwant my son to have it when I am gone, but who knows in 20-30 years...
|
30 September 2017, 04:55 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Sydney
Watch: Omega SMP
Posts: 59
|
Patek. RM is anything but under the radar.
|
1 October 2017, 10:44 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Jason
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 269
|
The Patek 5078P is pretty stealth.. 👌
|
4 October 2017, 07:49 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
maybe if you can get your hands on one: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/in...seconds-vision
quite a bit under the radar compared to most GF. |
5 October 2017, 12:41 AM | #41 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,898
|
Quote:
I was trying to find out what a KV MR would cost and came across this. Was this inspiration for your hunter caseback? http://www.ablogtowatch.com/voutilai...iece-unique-2/
__________________
|
|
5 October 2017, 01:12 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
Personally, I think going into watches (for the first time) with the intention to spend that much is a recipe for disappointment
Start with parameters like water resistance, brand, etc. and work from there. Maybe someone is dead set on spending 300K but the best watch for their lifestyle is a 5711 they could source for under 35K My dad used to collect Patek and now only has a GMTII LN and a fitbit. They say life is the toughest teacher, right? |
5 October 2017, 01:14 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
5 October 2017, 01:22 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
5 October 2017, 02:12 AM | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
Quote:
He was texting me all these complicated RM and Patek watches, agonizing for months. Finally, I sent him some pictures of simple good watches like SubC, GMTIIc, AP Diver, Aquanaut, Nautilus, etc. He grabbed a BNIB blue dial 5711 at a premium and never looked back. One watch guy. Last 3 times I saw him, he paid the bill to make up for all the money I saved him |
|
5 October 2017, 02:52 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
Personally I would just sell him a G shock and tell him it cost £300 000- he wouldn't know or care!!!
|
5 October 2017, 02:54 AM | #47 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,278
|
For £300k GBP I would go British. Greubel Forsey.
https://www.chrono24.co.uk/greubelfo...-id5153272.htm |
5 October 2017, 02:55 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.