Sub c for sub c lv

[jrs146]

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

I'd say you're crazy. The MSRP on the LV is only $500 more than the LN. The current hype is what's pushing it, but who knows how long that will last. By criteria:

1. Who cares? Which one do you prefer?
2. Nobody can really know in the long run. Watches aren't investments, so you're better off just wearing the one you like.
3. If you have to finance a watch, you can't afford it. Essentially, you would be financing a loss on your LN. This alone is a pretty strong argument for sticking with the watch you already have.
4. Again, hype. Which one do you like better? You obviously liked the LN enough to buy it in the first place. How much better do you like the LV?

There are 58 posts after this one (the first reply) but I believe this answer is as good as it can get. So I’ll just agree with my man JacksonStone


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by DanielBoncu2902

1. I like both and up to now, i can not decide which one is better. Its probably like 50.1% - 49.9% to LV side. But i might be biased

Well...I guess you need to decide if .2% is worth $3k.

Seriously, if you're that even on your likes for each, then you're much better off just sourcing one down the road and adding it to your existing collection.