ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jeff hess · 23 March 2009, 12:41 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-ra...713.m153.l1262

Seller says "100% genuine Rolex frame, paint, lettering & luminous"

I don't think so.

Orchi?

Tudorman?

Jeff

tudorman8276 · 23 March 2009, 01:20 PM

...if you say is questionable, then I would be inclined to think so.

...what I do in FACT see, is that the mounts are obvious (holes thru the plate) and would lead me to think they are AM.

...what say you??

Stan.

Orchi · 23 March 2009, 02:17 PM

Err buddy Jeff...good catch...!

The plate may be Rolex...but the rest looks to be REDONE with
Aftermarket stones...

Please stay 100ft away from it...

2careless · 23 March 2009, 07:25 PM

seller is rhondalm1965

jeff hess · 23 March 2009, 10:24 PM

Also has questionable Tiffany dial and bad feedback for selling redone dials as original!

tudorman8276 · 24 March 2009, 01:59 AM

...if you ask me.

Stan.

ibsober · 24 March 2009, 04:44 AM

I would not even consider myself in the same ballpark with some of you guys. Stan has forgotten more than I will ever know about bands, Pav has a collection that makes me drool, Orchi is the oracle of knowledge, and Steve...well lets leave him out of this. My point is even a blind man or a simple novice like myself can see that Rolex did not put the pretty stones on that dial...with that said, the dial from past experience in the forum has been altered and as such should be listed as a Rolex dial with pretty stones.

Terry Newton · 24 March 2009, 11:10 AM

I went to look at it and it has disappeared.

BANDOFTHEHAND!

Terry Newton

jeff hess · 24 March 2009, 09:43 PM

HE has about 7 others that should be taken down... And his Tiffany dial is suspect too. And if selling papers is AOK , then I have some work to do!

Jeff

23 March 2009, 12:41 PM	#1
jeff hess "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Jeffrey P Hess Location: florida Watch: Patek and Ball Posts: 516	100% original? c'mon http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-ra...713.m153.l1262 Seller says "100% genuine Rolex frame, paint, lettering & luminous" I don't think so. Orchi? Tudorman? Jeff

23 March 2009, 01:20 PM	#2
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...Jeff, you have had more of these go thru your hands than I... ...if you say is questionable, then I would be inclined to think so. ...what I do in FACT see, is that the mounts are obvious (holes thru the plate) and would lead me to think they are AM. ...what say you?? Stan.

24 March 2009, 01:59 AM	#6
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...the mounting holes are definitely suspect... ...if you ask me. Stan.

24 March 2009, 11:10 AM	#8
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	I went to look at it and it has disappeared. BANDOFTHEHAND! Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

23 March 2009, 02:17 PM	#3
Orchi Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Malaysia Posts: 2,934	Err buddy Jeff...good catch...! The plate may be Rolex...but the rest looks to be REDONE with Aftermarket stones... Please stay 100ft away from it...

23 March 2009, 07:25 PM	#4
2careless "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Melbourne, AU Watch: Pepsi Posts: 4,370	seller is rhondalm1965

23 March 2009, 10:24 PM	#5
jeff hess "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Jeffrey P Hess Location: florida Watch: Patek and Ball Posts: 516	Also has questionable Tiffany dial and bad feedback for selling redone dials as original!

24 March 2009, 04:44 AM	#7
ibsober "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Posts: 237	I would not even consider myself in the same ballpark with some of you guys. Stan has forgotten more than I will ever know about bands, Pav has a collection that makes me drool, Orchi is the oracle of knowledge, and Steve...well lets leave him out of this. My point is even a blind man or a simple novice like myself can see that Rolex did not put the pretty stones on that dial...with that said, the dial from past experience in the forum has been altered and as such should be listed as a Rolex dial with pretty stones.

24 March 2009, 09:43 PM	#9
jeff hess "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Jeffrey P Hess Location: florida Watch: Patek and Ball Posts: 516	HE has about 7 others that should be taken down... And his Tiffany dial is suspect too. And if selling papers is AOK , then I have some work to do! Jeff

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)