ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 August 2018, 03:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Charlie
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,534
|
Current gen ROC vs previous gen ROC.
Guys,
I traded in my 26320ST towards my 5712, and while I love the 5712, there was something about the ROC that I really miss. So now I find myself looking at some options in the market, and boy, what the hell happened? Why did they make the counters different size??? They completely removed the elegance these had. I'm curious though, is it only me? I like the 'contrasting' color options. What I don't like is the strange size. If I have to get one of the current ones, I'd get the panda white/black or blue/silver. I could find a NIB from the previous ones, I'd probably get the white (silver). What is your opinion on these and which colors do you like?
__________________
I have all the grails I could ever want, but the hunt will always continue . |
14 August 2018, 03:24 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,228
|
I much prefer the new contrasting subdials and dials, and yes at first the smaller subdial did jar with me, as it did on the old VCO, but I'm over that now really, and I do prefer these.
|
14 August 2018, 03:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
OP, I did agree with you, but over time the current ROC has really grown on me also - and I’m now sorely tempted to get one
|
14 August 2018, 03:36 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
|
I much prefer the 26300 39mm variants and would find one of them if it were me. Panda specifically!
|
14 August 2018, 04:30 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,333
|
Given the choice between current vs previous my order would be
1. Blue/silver 2. Silver/black 3. Blue (previous gen) 4. Black/silver 5. Silver 6. Black I really like the contrasting subdials on the current model a lot more than the monotone on the previous model. |
14 August 2018, 04:53 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,277
|
Love the old 26300 panda
|
14 August 2018, 05:53 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,076
|
I do like the current ROC panda, but not enough to buy one over a blue 15400 (my other choice). The contrasting subs look great but I can't help but see the Mickey Mouse effect. The date placement also throws me off a little bit.
__________________
Instagram: @wiswrist |
14 August 2018, 05:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Socal
Watch: AP/PP/Rolex
Posts: 1,779
|
I did question the smaller seconds dial at first, but it really started growing on me. I much prefer the color contrast dials of the new version too. It grew on me so much, I had to buy one.
__________________
PP 5205G-013/ PP 5212A / AP 15416CE /26574 st QP/ AP 50th 16202st /AP 15500st Black / AP 26405CE / AP 77350CE / AP 15551st / AP 67540sk /Daytona C White/Rolex SS BLRO / Rolex Sub Green / Rolex Explorer II/ Rolex DJ Blue |
14 August 2018, 10:36 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Usa
Watch: All
Posts: 1,411
|
I prefer the new to the old. Think the blue and the white are both really special.
|
14 August 2018, 11:02 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
I used to own this 25860, I like the proportions of the 39mm better than the 41mm.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
14 August 2018, 12:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: US
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 272
|
I have the current panda, really appreciate the iterative improvement with the larger and better visibility chrono subdials. Good balance to the dial overall, they shifted the date to keep good feng shui.
The better dial aside, 41mm in a Royal oak case is a bit big, 39mm might be better for smaller wristed and/or less showy folks. Mine flashes like a disco ball and is hard to miss, big presence. Definitely try it on to get a sense of size, like midway between a traditional RO and ROO in wrist stance. |
14 August 2018, 01:03 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Ed
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: BLRO 5712
Posts: 787
|
Quote:
|
|
14 August 2018, 02:47 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
|
15 August 2018, 12:43 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,499
|
|
15 August 2018, 01:12 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 954
|
I like the updated size as well as the contrast on the dials. I currently own a Blue 26331ST and it's an awesome piece compared to the previous dials that didn't' do much for me.
__________________
AP 26238 RG BRICK, AP 26420 TAUPE AP 15407ST SKELLY, AP 26470ST BATMAN Rolex SD43 Instagram: Chary1 |
15 August 2018, 01:28 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
the 39mm would be my choice.
the only drawback, for me, are its markers... wish they could've used the same applied versions as those on the 41mm models. |
15 August 2018, 02:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
|
Prefer the new 41mm ROC. The panda dials makes it more interesting and the biggest improvement for me is the chrono pushers can now be activated without unscrewing the push crowns. That makes it possible to instantly activate the chronograph which is not possible in older generations of ROCs.
Some folks here complained that the date window is not centrally aligned between 4 and 5'oclock but it doesn't bother me. Of course, the obligatory pic
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.