ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 January 2008, 08:54 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I had one of these (vintage of around 1985) and always liked the lightweight and acrylic crystal. It's much lighter than my 16710.
|
27 January 2008, 09:01 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Brisbane Aus.
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,443
|
Quote:
Yes, I have heard all sorts of stories regarding taking vintage watches to Rolex service centres and them coming back with replaced dials, hands, bezels etc, a bit of a worry. |
|
2 March 2008, 11:55 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Beautiful 16750 !
|
2 March 2008, 03:23 PM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Brisbane Aus.
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,443
|
Quote:
They had totally ignored my request about me wanting to keep the original hands, dial and bezel and insisted that if I went ahead with the service it would only be done if the hands and bezel were replaced but I did have the option to keep the original dial although they didn't recommend it, which would save me $341.00 Au. and thus bring the price down to a mere $973.00 for the service. They insisted that the hands had cracked lume and that it could drop out during service, perhaps it could, but I was happy to take that risk. To me the bezel is fine, I can replace that myself when I locate a good original one of the period. Needless to say, I declined to leave it for a service and was glad to be on my way with my baby back on my wrist. (but wait, there is more) The following morning in my hotel I noticed my watch hands were out of sync.!, (see pic) when the hour hand was on the hour, the minute hand was down at the half hour mark, not on the hour, ahhhh, what had happened. I took it straight back to the service centre to see what they thought might have happened, all very odd. The service guy who actually did the quote said via the receptionist that it was nothing to do with him, all they do when doing a quote is to take the back off just to see the movement. I could not believe it, it was just too much of a coincidence, my watch had been working perfectly up to this point then straight after the quote it's wrong, very strange. I asked to speak with the technician, I needed to hear it from his mouth, and that's exactly what he told me, it could not of happened here. By this time, we were all getting a bit excited so it was decided to send for the boss!! A nice enough lad, he explained to me exactly as the other guy had, no way it could have happened here, they don't touch the hands when quoting, just take the back off to examine it, you must have bumped it. So that was that, what could I say. He said as a show of good faith he would sort the hands out for me for $50.00 which I agreed to, accepting that I must have bumped it, cant possibly imagine what I did to cause them to jump out of sync. guess it WAS just a coincidence, it certainly left an odd feeling in my gut for my first ever visit to a Rolex service department though. I finally received my watch back the next day, hands all back as they should be and it's still going fine. |
|
2 March 2008, 03:56 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with a RSC. It is a beautiful watch and one can tell it is your pride and joy and you take good care of it.
Here's hoping for many more good years with a fine timepiece . Terry Newton |
2 March 2008, 06:19 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: Montreal
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 129
|
Never ever never replace that dial, they'll switch it for a gloss version with white gold surround markers.
|
2 March 2008, 08:07 PM | #67 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Brisbane Aus.
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,443
|
Quote:
Quote:
I just wonder how many unsuspecting vintage watch owners there are that only wanted the movement serviced but ended up with their prize piece being ruined with a dial and hands update, its a worry. |
||
26 March 2008, 01:54 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY
Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT
Posts: 1,378
|
Still have my GMT from 1987!!
Love it and will never part with it. SS and red/blue bez is great. Great time keeper and virtually impossible to damage.
|
26 March 2008, 11:54 PM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
That is far too nice to replace
__________________
Daytona 116520 |
|
27 March 2008, 08:31 PM | #70 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 28
|
excellent watch review! very interesting and I learned a lot from it 8)
|
2 April 2008, 08:56 AM | #71 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
Great review, thanks. Love the 16750!
|
2 April 2008, 10:59 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
|
Almost two years after writing this review people are still finding it useful. That's awesome!!!
__________________
Member #471 |
2 April 2008, 11:24 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: rudolph
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 2,026
|
do you still have the watch?
__________________
tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D) |
2 April 2008, 11:28 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
|
Nope. Sometimes I wish I did. I have a new Pepsi now.
__________________
Member #471 |
20 April 2008, 10:35 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
Me too Jeff, can't wait to get it in my hands tomorrow
I enjoyed a lot your great review
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
22 April 2008, 02:36 PM | #76 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SINGAPORE
Posts: 23
|
|
27 April 2008, 02:37 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: north vancouver
Watch: 1680 / speedy pro
Posts: 474
|
I *just* acquired the same watch you have pictured here. This thread was useul to me today because I needed info on the bezel insert sizing.
TRF still rocks.
__________________
1997 Speedmaster Pro: Hesalite, steel back, three dials and manual wind. The classic. 1969 Submariner 1680: Very refreshed - The diver. 1950's Milus: 18k gold, manual wind, no date - the dinner watch. Seiko 6309 The perfect watch for a trip to Mexico. |
30 November 2009, 12:02 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3
|
My 16750 seems to be under powered after my servicing. It seems to be able to run for 6-7 hours and it stops. Can the experts here advise on this? Is there a need to wind this watch? Clockwise?
Help. |
30 November 2009, 10:21 AM | #79 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: north vancouver
Watch: 1680 / speedy pro
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
Whenever I wear one of my other watches I let the GMT run down in my secret drawer.. When I put it the GMT on again the first thing I do give it 30-some winds, clockwise. That's the first detent after unscrewing the crown. Then I set the date to the day before today, that's the second detent, then I set the time by first passing through midnight to flip the date to the actual date, then setting the clock to the correct time. That would be the third detent. So yes, wind the watch.
__________________
1997 Speedmaster Pro: Hesalite, steel back, three dials and manual wind. The classic. 1969 Submariner 1680: Very refreshed - The diver. 1950's Milus: 18k gold, manual wind, no date - the dinner watch. Seiko 6309 The perfect watch for a trip to Mexico. |
|
11 December 2009, 09:50 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Starting to really want a 16750 here, great post!
|
15 December 2009, 01:36 AM | #81 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Josh
Location: Nashville
Watch: Rolex GMT-Master 2
Posts: 41
|
Freakin Gorgeous
|
13 January 2010, 06:01 PM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 38
|
Great review, Wonderfull pictures
|
13 January 2010, 06:02 PM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 38
|
What model you have now?
|
7 July 2010, 04:49 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Westfield, IN
Posts: 256
|
Great review! I would have kept the original dial and hands though.
|
2 May 2011, 03:12 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester
Watch: GMT Master 1675
Posts: 4
|
Does anyone know what the numbers of 585, 580, and 78360 on the back of the Rolex stand for ?
|
2 April 2023, 02:07 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
|
just picked one of these up. i have owned many 6 digit (11 series not the newer ones) subs and various watches (AP,Blancain, Omega) and this is a great package. very comfortable on the wrist! hard to believe it is 43 years old. it does have a mk4 service dial but i will live.
the acrylic "glass" means a substantially lighter watch and the profile is very skinny which again = comfort not achievable with more modern heavier watches. |
5 April 2023, 08:37 AM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: 116718•16520•1655
Posts: 109
|
Awesome review!
|
1 May 2023, 09:32 PM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Denmark
Posts: 129
|
Thanks for the review
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.