The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 May 2023, 11:27 PM   #1
nickscaps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Watch: DJ126200 Blue
Posts: 71
Icon3 Show us your Explorer 40s!

Hey everyone - I realize there have been a few threads in which people are showing off live pics of the Explorer 40 (this is in addition to the media pics from W&W). I wanted to see if there were any interest in consolidating them here, I can't wait to see one in the metal but this is the next best thing! I understand they may be few and far between but it's worth a shot.
nickscaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2023, 05:06 AM   #2
Snowballs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Global in 1C
Watch: 1675
Posts: 418
Still waiting for one to appear at the AD
__________________
1675, 14060M, 16600, 16610, 16610LV, 16622, 16700LN
Snowballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2023, 11:03 AM   #3
bluestreak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,442
This was at my AD. I didn’t buy it. Didn’t Sing to me.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bluestreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 May 2023, 11:09 PM   #4
Snowballs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Global in 1C
Watch: 1675
Posts: 418
Thanks for posting those pics of the 40 bluestreak.

IMHO the 36 Explorer looks sleeker and would be my choice over the new 40.
__________________
1675, 14060M, 16600, 16610, 16610LV, 16622, 16700LN
Snowballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 12:00 AM   #5
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,490
They should have kept the 39mm

40mm seems way too large!
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 12:12 AM   #6
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
They should have kept the 39mm

40mm seems way too large!
Strong feelings for 1 mm.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 06:38 AM   #7
Stromness
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Canada/UK
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluestreak View Post
This was at my AD. I didn’t buy it. Didn’t Sing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree.

Was in my AD last week and they had one that had come in for a client who's a pro athlete and Rolex collector -- and 6'4" 230. It's lovely but a whole lot of dial, likely a better fit for those with larger wrists or who prefer a higher dial/ bezel ratio overall, a la BP 43.

When these were released I did think about swapping my place on the Exp 36 list for a (far more distant) place on the 40, but my wrist is 6.75 and I already find my Longines Spirit Ti largish for a 3-hander. I prefer to dive with larger watches but the Exp works best in the smaller size for me. Nice to have options though.

In my case the decision was made for me -- my 36 is in, and I should be able to pick it up in a week or so once home. Can't wait.
Stromness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 07:57 AM   #8
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Strong feelings for 1 mm.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 09:05 AM   #9
Jefferyasher
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemanlee View Post
They should have kept the 39mm

40mm seems way too large!
I know people have their preferences and such, but does the thickness of a driver's license or credit card (~1mm) make that much difference?
Jefferyasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 09:06 AM   #10
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluestreak View Post
This was at my AD. I didn’t buy it. Didn’t Sing to me.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good illustration of why this size does not suit the watch at all. No wonder it didn't sing to you!
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2023, 10:08 AM   #11
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
Good illustration of why this size does not suit the watch at all. No wonder it didn't sing to you!
Agree. When I saw it on a stand, or in a display box, it looks great, in terms of proportionality (same as the 36). But too large, flat, and dial-y for my liking.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2023, 10:23 PM   #12
whybrge
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 6
I need a few more posts before I can link images - but I brought in my OP39 to compare and it was hard to tell any difference other than the obvious larger crown.
whybrge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2023, 10:28 PM   #13
goldboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: canada
Watch: Daytona 116500
Posts: 428
39mm was too large, 40mm is certainly too large. But - people keep forgetting that everyone has a different wrist size. A 40mm Explorer could fit someone with a large wrist perfectly. Someone with a small wrist like myself should simply go for the 36mm.

The Explorer makes a great 1 watch collection, but in my opinion it becomes mundane in a multi watch collection.
goldboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2023, 10:32 PM   #14
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,703
They’ve tinkered with this reference long enough …. Pick a size rolex
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2023, 10:34 PM   #15
whybrge
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 6
I think my dream would be a white faced Exp1 - 36 OR 39!
whybrge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 03:06 AM   #16
nickscaps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Watch: DJ126200 Blue
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by whybrge View Post
I need a few more posts before I can link images - but I brought in my OP39 to compare and it was hard to tell any difference other than the obvious larger crown.
Can't wait - that'd be the first comparison between the older 39 style case with this new 40.
nickscaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 04:43 AM   #17
Rolexatlast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 772
Maybe we need a 38mm.

Go for it, Rolex.
Rolexatlast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 08:29 AM   #18
Nodzex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 650
I am still waiting for mine. My AD said July. He sourced me othe models and I know he will come through, as always.
Can’t wait!.
Since I have large wrists, I was hoping Rolex releases 41mm Explorer. Hopefully 40mm will look small.
Nodzex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 08:30 AM   #19
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodzex View Post
I am still waiting for mine. My AD said July. He sourced me othe models and I know he will come through, as always.
Can’t wait!.
Since I have large wrists, I was hoping Rolex releases 41mm Explorer. Hopefully 40mm will look small.
If you want a 41mm Explorer, I would suggest you get the previous generation Tudor Ranger. Absolutely stunning watch. It’s basically a 4 digit Explorer except 41mm. I love everything about it except it’s a little too big for me to wear.

Would be perfect on you.

Great write up on it from when it first came out, by Ben at Hodinkee.
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 08:59 AM   #20
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldboy View Post
39mm was too large, 40mm is certainly too large. But - people keep forgetting that everyone has a different wrist size. A 40mm Explorer could fit someone with a large wrist perfectly. Someone with a small wrist like myself should simply go for the 36mm.

The Explorer makes a great 1 watch collection, but in my opinion it becomes mundane in a multi watch collection.
I wear it when I'm feeling mundane.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
zengineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 10:30 AM   #21
Nodzex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scholar View Post
If you want a 41mm Explorer, I would suggest you get the previous generation Tudor Ranger. Absolutely stunning watch. It’s basically a 4 digit Explorer except 41mm. I love everything about it except it’s a little too big for me to wear.

Would be perfect on you.

Great write up on it from when it first came out, by Ben at Hodinkee.
Never thought of that. I will look it up!
Thanks!
Nodzex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 11:50 AM   #22
TimeAZ
"TRF" Member
 
TimeAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,133
The 39mm was perfect. Absolute perfect size, perfect proportions, and the most balanced dial. I will never sell mine. Here it is on a 6.25 inch wrist.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 39exp.jpg (226.8 KB, 228 views)
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life.
TimeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 10:25 PM   #23
JSol1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New England
Posts: 1,661
Timely post. I went to my AD to compare the 2 on 6.75” wrist yesterday. Went in convinced that the 40 would be the one, but as others have pointed out, there’s something about it that feels off proportion wise.
I’m on the fence on whether the 36 is a tad too small. Really need to step back and consider whether I would adapt to the size as it may just be I’m used to the 40’s. I do own 2 Daytonas and they are definitely the smallest size/fit wise for obvious reasons and are perfect size wise for me…the hunt continues…
JSol1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2023 , 224270 , explorer , rolex


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.