The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 May 2023, 08:52 PM   #31
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potawatomi View Post
There's more to the story. The 11 GMTs were in the supercase. When the 12 series came about we saw the slimming of the lugs. So you can't just say does a GMT have different case than a 40 sub? Which GMT do you have is the first question.
11 GMTs were different to 11 Subs. So, yes you can. Different (slimmer) lugs, different case thickness/height, different machining for the bezel and crown guards. Similar design, but not the same case.

There is much conjecture about 12 GMT's having slimmer lugs again than 11 GMTs. Rolex referred to it as reprofiled or redesigned from memory.

I see a very subtle re shaping between 11 and 12 GMTs.

__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2023, 10:02 PM   #32
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
11 GMTs were different to 11 Subs. So, yes you can. Different (slimmer) lugs, different case thickness/height, different machining for the bezel and crown guards. Similar design, but not the same case.

There is much conjecture about 12 GMT's having slimmer lugs again than 11 GMTs. Rolex referred to it as reprofiled or redesigned from memory.

I see a very subtle re shaping between 11 and 12 GMTs.

Now the ultimate proving ground ….

We need someone with both to place side by side pics and measure as above
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 12:36 AM   #33
ducatiti
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 835
I’m glad we have some closure re modern gmt vs sub 41 :)

I would love to see the difference between the 116 vs 126 just for kicks…
ducatiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 04:57 AM   #34
amh
"TRF" Member
 
amh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by amh View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by nighthawk77 View Post
I think on this photo the GMT definitely looks thinner...crown guards also look slightly different
That picture?

No - inconclusive. The watches in the photo are offset, you can tell by the alignment, just look at the edge of the bracelet. Annotated below


However Fredrik did post up a convincing image.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
- "GMT lugs are skinnier than the 6-digit Sub40 " Not a rumour. Fact that anyone with half decent eyesight can see.

- "The newest 6-digit GMT lugs are skinnier than the slightly older ceramic GMT" Debatable, I agree.

In my opinion they're all the same: Supercase or Maxi case. Your opinion is valid to you, but wrong.


I'll admit. I was wrong! Wrong wrong wrong.




Next challenge: Measure the 11 and 12 series GMTs
amh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 05:33 AM   #35
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,488
They are different, they look and wear different to.
The GMT is slightly heavier and it sits flatter on the wrist.
GMT has a slightly deeper case than the Sub too.
The Sub has a deeper case back making it sit higher on the wrist and making it feel top heavy compared to the GMT.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 05:48 AM   #36
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by amh View Post
That picture?

No - inconclusive. The watches in the photo are offset, you can tell by the alignment, just look at the edge of the bracelet. Annotated below
What is inconclusive? They are visibly different. You don't need to have them set with the bracelets aligned to see that


Quote:
Originally Posted by amh View Post
Next challenge: Measure the 11 and 12 series GMTs
Now that would be interesting
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 06:27 AM   #37
Fredrik
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by amh View Post

Next challenge: Measure the 11 and 12 series GMTs
Oh crap... I knew I shouldn't have measured, now I need to get an 11 series GMT...
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 11:55 AM   #38
Kenny G
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 947
IRL, there is no appreciable visual difference. They are both fatties. Anyone looking for a slimmer profile needs to go 5 digit or earlier. I have an 11 series and I love it for what it is but it’s chunky no question..
Kenny G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2023, 12:49 PM   #39
ducatiti
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 835
My initial impression from watching dozens of videos over the years, GMT lugs seem a tad bit smaller. Pictures above reflect this too. Not trying to start an argument but rather stating my opinion. It even shows the overall shape of the sub being "squarish" compared to the GMT being a little more tapered.
ducatiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2023, 11:22 PM   #40
AD337
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 788
Sorry to dig this back up but damn I really thought you guys were trolling saying it was the same - or maybe Im just overly observant but to me that’s instantly recognizable is as extremely different
AD337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 12:35 AM   #41
Partners
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Usa
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by AD337 View Post
Sorry to dig this back up but damn I really thought you guys were trolling saying it was the same - or maybe Im just overly observant but to me that’s instantly recognizable is as extremely different
You’re not overly observant. You are OCD like most others on this forum arguing about things that IRL dont matter. At least this isn’t a 32xx movement thread. Lol. Talk about OCD.
Partners is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 01:49 AM   #42
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 6,538
Had the BLNR. They really need to make the lugs smaller, bracelet wider, just like the sub41. I bet it’s coming next year or year after.
__________________
126610LN
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 01:58 AM   #43
AD337
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRell View Post
Had the BLNR. They really need to make the lugs smaller, bracelet wider, just like the sub41. I bet it’s coming next year or year after.
So, I have to agree that they should do this..

However, I have to disagree that it’s coming anytime soon

I’d surely love to be wrong though :)
AD337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 02:00 AM   #44
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by AD337 View Post
So, I have to agree that they should do this..

However, I have to disagree that it’s coming anytime soon

I’d surely love to be wrong though :)
I feel like it is due. The black and gold gmt was a small release, nothing big. They are keeping status quo until the change. Subs first, Daytona was updated, my money is in the GMT next to change.
__________________
126610LN
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 03:10 AM   #45
ducatiti
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 835
That would suck for current gmt Owners if the lugs get updated.
ducatiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 03:23 AM   #46
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRell View Post
Had the BLNR. They really need to make the lugs smaller, bracelet wider, just like the sub41. I bet it’s coming next year or year after.
Anything is possible, but considering the new Daytona is “blockier shaped” than the outgoing gen, I’m not so sure

IMHO there are trade offs with any changes they make. The clasp on the new Sub isn’t the greatest in size for some
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 04:18 AM   #47
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Anything is possible, but considering the new Daytona is “blockier shaped” than the outgoing gen, I’m not so sure

IMHO there are trade offs with any changes they make. The clasp on the new Sub isn’t the greatest in size for some
I can see that. I had both the 40 and 41 subs and don’t notice the difference on the arm with the clasp, but do notice the lugs.
__________________
126610LN
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2023, 05:14 AM   #48
ducatiti
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 835
Hafiz has a good video comparing the two.
ducatiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.