The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Reference Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 March 2009, 08:08 PM   #1
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,033
Basel 2009: New TT Blue & TT Black Subs.

I need to see these in person....

2009 Sub3.jpg

The Press Release Data:
OYSTER PERPETUAL SUBMARINER DATE

Ref. 116613 LN - 97203
Yellow Rolesor


The Oyster Perpetual Submariner Date Rolesor continues the tradition of the
absolute reference in divers’ watches.

The case features a new unidirectional rotatable bezel in 18 ct yellow gold with a black Cerachrom disc and a 120-notch anti-reverse click system.

Waterproof to a depth of 300 metres (1,000 feet), the Oyster Perpetual Submariner Date is chronometer-certified by the Swiss Official Chronometer Testing Institute (COSC). The movement is equipped with a Parachrom hairspring, highly resistant to shocks and magnetic fields, which ensures its superlative chronometric precision and remarkable reliability.

Black dial.

Oyster bracelet with Glidelock clasp.

2009 Sub2.jpg


Ref. 116613 LB - 97203
Yellow Rolesor

The Oyster Perpetual Submariner Date Rolesor continues the tradition of the
absolute reference in divers’ watches.

The case features a new unidirectional rotatable bezel in 18 ct yellow gold with a blue Cerachrom disc and a 120-notch anti-reverse click system.

Waterproof to a depth of 300 metres (1,000 feet), the Oyster Perpetual Submariner Date is chronometer-certified by the Swiss Official Chronometer Testing Institute (COSC). The movement is equipped with a Parachrom hairspring, highly resistant to shocks and magnetic fields, which ensures its superlative chronometric precision and remarkable reliability.

Blue dial.

Oyster bracelet with Glidelock clasp.

.....Technical Information........

sub166618LN01.jpg

sub166618LN02.jpg

sub166618LN03.jpg

sub166618LN04.jpg

sub166618LN05.jpg



That's all I'm saying............
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 03:06 AM   #2
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Thanks, Larry.....but I have just ONE nagging question.

Is that the actual colour of the steel, or are those pics making the steel look like Titanium?

I'm pretty sure that most of us would NOT like that Titanium colour at all. Steel is steel and should look as such.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 04:46 AM   #3
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
Thanks JJ, I noticed the difference but couldn't quite figure out what to make of it. A bit odd considering Rolex does do very nice photos.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 05:16 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Thanks, Larry.....but I have just ONE nagging question.

Is that the actual colour of the steel, or are those pics making the steel look like Titanium?

I'm pretty sure that most of us would NOT like that Titanium colour at all. Steel is steel and should look as such.

JJ
Probably has to do with the lighting Rolex uses.. I wouldn't expect any new metals, although they do use a heavier grain than other companies.

Here is a side-by-side look:

BaselSub.jpg
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 07:02 AM   #5
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Is that the actual colour of the steel, or are those pics making the steel look like Titanium?

JJ
It's the shading they are using in order to de-smurf the blue.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 10:28 AM   #6
bradg
"TRF" Member
 
bradg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Brad
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Watch: 14060M,GMT1675,
Posts: 650
That smurf blue bothers me....the other is about the nicest new release I've seen...the others stink
bradg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 01:33 PM   #7
ROLEXOFMIAMI
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Meir
Location: Miami, Fl
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradg View Post
That smurf blue bothers me
me too
ROLEXOFMIAMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 01:43 PM   #8
hflee55
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
yup...something odd about the smurf...
hflee55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 04:40 PM   #9
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Probably has to do with the lighting Rolex uses.. I wouldn't expect any new metals, although they do use a heavier grain than other companies.

Here is a side-by-side look:

Attachment 60823
That's much better, Larry....thanks!!

Have to admit just one thing.....the BLACK actually looks better. Why couldn't Rolex get the correct shade of BLUE?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 07:17 PM   #10
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,632
The black dial is stunning. The blue dial stinks.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 07:54 PM   #11
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
i can't for the life of me see any reason to buy a sub instead of the gmt master unless you want a simpler watch. it's the same watch with 1 less complication. i guess if you like the blue that would be a little motivation but if i want a black tt i will just buy the tt gmt.
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2009, 11:04 PM   #12
hwilsdorf
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 106
The blue TT looks worse than the superseded 16613.

The glossy black ceramic bezel is just pure class! Love to see it in person myself.
hwilsdorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2009, 02:29 AM   #13
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
The black dial is stunning. The blue dial stinks.
i agree with you..i still love the bluesy color...
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2009, 05:38 AM   #14
newsean2000
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: sean
Location: NJ
Watch: rolex datejust
Posts: 27
Icon13

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradg View Post
That smurf blue bothers me....the other is about the nicest new release I've seen...the others stink
+1

Blue and yellow gold do not match. Should be a no no.
It's not even like it's a nice blue either.
newsean2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2009, 06:06 AM   #15
Oscar
"TRF" Member
 
Oscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melb, Australia
Watch: SS GMTIIC
Posts: 1,350
Gee, I love the look of the new Sub. I'm curious what the MSRP will be here in Australia when it arrives.........
Oscar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2009, 08:20 AM   #16
bewithabob
"TRF" Member
 
bewithabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,413
the blue dial reminds me of ....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 63blacksheep.jpg (43.7 KB, 6254 views)
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist...

116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST,
CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun



"Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end."
bewithabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2009, 11:06 AM   #17
Triple Black 88
"TRF" Member
 
Triple Black 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
UGH... what happened to that beautiful Blue
Triple Black 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2009, 02:43 PM   #18
chenx15
"TRF" Member
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
me likey very much. but i was told no discount even in recession
__________________
16 GS Titles
16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi)
23 Consecutive GS semifinals
17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1
5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups
5 consecutive US open
4 Australian open
1 Sweet french open
a crown for every achievement
The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex
chenx15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 May 2009, 12:25 AM   #19
zidaneong
"TRF" Member
 
zidaneong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex YG Datejust
Posts: 274
still prefer the steel one, as it looks classier, at least for me. :)
__________________
[1] Rolex TT Blue Dial Submariner 16613 (M serial) [2] Rolex YG Datejust 16018 (8 mil Serial) [3] Rolex YG Datejust 16238 (L Serial) [4] Rolex YG Gold Crystal Daytona 116518 [5] Patek Philippe SS Aquanaut 5065
zidaneong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2009, 06:03 PM   #20
He Man
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 43
I agreed. SS look much cleaner.
He Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2009, 06:55 AM   #21
Straight
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 17
Not into that blue. Hate to say it, but some of the fake Asian subs that have been knocking around for years got the shade of blue right.

No reason for me to consider swapping out my GMTIIc.
Straight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2009, 04:41 AM   #22
cosimo
"TRF" Member
 
cosimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: florida,usa
Watch: TT blue sub
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodybump View Post
i agree with you..i still love the bluesy color...
Maybe because Im new, maybe because I just acquired a tt blue sub ( not this shade) but I think that blue is sweet and has a kind of pop to it.
cosimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 04:48 AM   #23
lawyerwatchfan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmr View Post
i can't for the life of me see any reason to buy a sub instead of the gmt master unless you want a simpler watch. it's the same watch with 1 less complication. i guess if you like the blue that would be a little motivation but if i want a black tt i will just buy the tt gmt.
Ahhh....but don't forget about the glidelock clasp on the new ceramic Sub. I believe that it is superior in function to anything else made by Rolex or any other manufacturer. The GMT IIC does not have the glidelock.
lawyerwatchfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 07:36 AM   #24
Wired1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Levittown, PA
Posts: 7
Black, all the way. Now, if only it were 3 mm bigger...
Wired1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2009, 08:34 AM   #25
cmr
"TRF" Member
 
cmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawyerwatchfan View Post
Ahhh....but don't forget about the glidelock clasp on the new ceramic Sub. I believe that it is superior in function to anything else made by Rolex or any other manufacturer. The GMT IIC does not have the glidelock.
it doesn't need a glidelock clasp as it doesn't go over a wet suite or diving gear. it has a comfort link for when my wrist swells and it works wonderfully!!
__________________
cmr


OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C
Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,
cmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2009, 05:35 AM   #26
AbstraKt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 48
My boss has the blue TT... the blue is actually not all that "punchy," so to speak. It's not all that subtle either. I'd say it's modest but noticeable.
AbstraKt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2009, 09:00 AM   #27
asindhidude
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: orlando
Watch: SS Sub ND - 14060M
Posts: 17
I'm not sure I understand the point - exactly what makes the ceramic bezel better / worse than the old one?
asindhidude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2009, 10:14 AM   #28
dxn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: california
Watch: datejust
Posts: 23
I have a GMTIIc and thinking about getting the tt blue sub. I thought about waiting for
the new 2009 but the blue on 2009 does not look as good as the old one. Now I'm thinking
of getting the old version instead. To me the color is more important than the ceramic
bezel or the solid link. Wish I can have both.
dxn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2009, 12:32 PM   #29
bokmeipai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by dxn View Post
I have a GMTIIc and thinking about getting the tt blue sub. I thought about waiting for
the new 2009 but the blue on 2009 does not look as good as the old one. Now I'm thinking
of getting the old version instead. To me the color is more important than the ceramic
bezel or the solid link. Wish I can have both.
Wt difference is there in the blue? I think it looks the same.
bokmeipai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2009, 12:44 PM   #30
Some Pair
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: seFl.byWayOfBklyn
Watch: The Rollie's.....
Posts: 609
Icon12 Uh Oh!

When I aquired my TT Bluesy, I had no interest in it's Black TT cousin at all.

Once I saw these two newest offerings, I'm all on board now with that "class act" Black Ceramic TT......
I Would like to see the new blue in person, but otherwise after seeing these great pics, I have no interest in the newest B L U E one at all.

Tho just my opinion....
Some Pair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.