The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 November 2017, 10:46 PM   #1
Bluside
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bluside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,063
Bose QC25 vs QC35 Headphones

My GF wants to buy me one of these Bose headphones for Christmas. Right now the wired QC25 are on sale everywhere for $179. The wireless Bluetooth QC35 are starting at $329 for the ones without Google assist.

I have found an aftermarket Bluetooth made by AirMod that fits into the QC25 for $69. That would bring the total for the QC25 to $250.

Is it worth the extra $80 to get the QC35? The battery in this model is not replaceable whereas the QC25 uses a AAA battery.

I will mainly use these on airplanes and at home watching TV when she is asleep.
Bluside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 03:45 AM   #2
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluside View Post
My GF wants to buy me one of these Bose headphones for Christmas. Right now the wired QC25 are on sale everywhere for $179. The wireless Bluetooth QC35 are starting at $329 for the ones without Google assist.

I have found an aftermarket Bluetooth made by AirMod that fits into the QC25 for $69. That would bring the total for the QC25 to $250.

Is it worth the extra $80 to get the QC35? The battery in this model is not replaceable whereas the QC25 uses a AAA battery.

I will mainly use these on airplanes and at home watching TV when she is asleep.
I am not sure I can convince you to pay the extra money, but I will only tell you I upgraded from the 25 to the 35 and have neve been happier. I wear them constantly on walks, at the gym, and on airplanes (I travel more then 100,000 miles every year). The battery life is exceptional, 20 hours an I have never had a problem with that. Yes, you can save 100 bucks with the bluetooth gizmo adapter you are referring to, (sorry, not familiar with that product) but that adds one more component that needs recharging(?) and could have a problem. Lastly I belive the electronics were upgraded in the 35s, they are a newer model with (I think) improved sound canceling.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 03:50 AM   #3
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
The 35s are excellent headphones. They're actually my favorite pair of headphones that I have owned (and I've owned some nice "audiophile" headphones). They're light, super comfortable, sound great and have great noise cancelling. With the Bose app, you can also reduce or turn off the noice cancelling if you want.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 03:55 AM   #4
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,471
What I found with Bose vs other brands is that the comfort is pretty much the best you can get.
No way you're going to keep B&O or Bowers and wilkins headphones on for more than 2 hours, Bose around ear is comfortable for long periods of time.

The cushions however do start to fall apart after 2 years and then need to be replaced.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 04:28 AM   #5
Syed117
"TRF" Member
 
Syed117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
Have that 35s as well.

They are great for one reason, the overall comfort. Very lightweight and comfortable.

I think they sound like trash though. The Sony 1000 are much better. Especially the new version.

I think the sonys are $350.

Have a bunch of headphones.

__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58
Syed117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 10:03 AM   #6
Bluside
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bluside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
I am not sure I can convince you to pay the extra money, but I will only tell you I upgraded from the 25 to the 35 and have neve been happier. I wear them constantly on walks, at the gym, and on airplanes (I travel more then 100,000 miles every year). The battery life is exceptional, 20 hours an I have never had a problem with that. Yes, you can save 100 bucks with the bluetooth gizmo adapter you are referring to, (sorry, not familiar with that product) but that adds one more component that needs recharging(?) and could have a problem. Lastly I belive the electronics were upgraded in the 35s, they are a newer model with (I think) improved sound canceling.
Good info...Thanks.
Bluside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2017, 11:23 AM   #7
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syed117 View Post
Have that 35s as well.

They are great for one reason, the overall comfort. Very lightweight and comfortable.

I think they sound like trash though. The Sony 1000 are much better. Especially the new version.

I think the sonys are $350.

Have a bunch of headphones.

Interesting thoughts. I think they sound pretty good.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 02:30 AM   #8
JasoninDenver
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,106
Love my QC 35 and I have been biased against Bose sound for years.

I agree with Syed that the Sony top shelf offering sounds noticeably better. However, the Bose on ear comfort is exceptional. I can wear these for 8 hours no problem. The Sony model seemed to crunch my ears after 10 minutes.
__________________
Jason

116610 LN
DateJust
Pelagos FXD
JasoninDenver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 02:42 AM   #9
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syed117 View Post
Have that 35s as well.

They are great for one reason, the overall comfort. Very lightweight and comfortable.

I think they sound like trash though. The Sony 1000 are much better. Especially the new version.

I think the sonys are $350.

Have a bunch of headphones.

From what I am hearing, the Sonys undisputed sound better than the QC 35 but the NC* in the Boses is still better.
What is your take on that?

*imo, that‘s the most important aspect when buying a NC headphone
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 03:03 AM   #10
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
I've been thinking about picking up a pair of QC35's also. Does anyone know if there is any sound difference between the I and the II's? I know the II"s have google assistant but im really am not interested in that.
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 03:24 AM   #11
Syed117
"TRF" Member
 
Syed117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
From what I am hearing, the Sonys undisputed sound better than the QC 35 but the NC* in the Boses is still better.
What is your take on that?

*imo, that‘s the most important aspect when buying a NC headphone
I haven't heard the Sony's for an extended period of time, so can't comment on the NC.

The Bose NC is great obviously, they are the standard and that's why I bought them. They were pretty much the only choice for so many years.

It just depends on what matters more to you. Based on many reviews, the new Sony model is about the same as the Bose in terms of NC.

In hindsight, I would prefer better sound quality even if the NC is a bit worse. I think the Sonys are comfortable, but the QC35 might have the edge there.

I don't think you can go wrong with either. If you don't really care about or can't easily compare the sound to other headphones, the Bose are great. My issue is that I have all these other headphones and then I put the Bose on and I don't like them.
Syed117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 04:20 AM   #12
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
I can't give you an opinion on the headphones, but I can refer you to a great place to buy Bose audio. Try out greentoe.com. You place an offer and then they contact authorized retailers who can accept such offers or counter. Very cool site, it gets around Minimum Advertised Pricing, products are new, offers are all in (shipping tax everything), they come with full warranty, and quite frankly I wish I built it.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 04:28 AM   #13
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
What I found with Bose vs other brands is that the comfort is pretty much the best you can get.
No way you're going to keep B&O or Bowers and wilkins headphones on for more than 2 hours, Bose around ear is comfortable for long periods of time.

The cushions however do start to fall apart after 2 years and then need to be replaced.
I got rid of my Bose because they were not comfortable for extended wear. My B&O H9's are the most comfortable headphones I have ever had.

I agree on the Bose cushions. Mine were ready to be replaced when i moved on from them. Its synthetic leather, so maybe that is why?
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 04:34 AM   #14
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
I'm a fan of the QC35s - they're super comfortable to wear for extended periods of time. Sound could be better at its price range, but noise cancellation is top notch. I had them with me during the years when I was doing 160K-230K butt-in-seat miles flying, and they were essential. I've recently tried the Sony 1000's - I can't speak to the NC, but I think the sound is slightly better. Less comfortable IMO.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 05:15 AM   #15
Rondineli
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Watch: DJ II
Posts: 1,271
I have both 25 and 35.

Why? Cuz I was travelling a lot this year and I FORGOT my QC35 at home one time and damn those small embraer are NOISY. Sooooo, I bought a QC25 at IAH on the way to Mexico...

Bottom line is that the QC35 has a much much better sound definition than that of QC25. Spend the extra $80 and get the QC35. Bluetooth or wired they are the best.
Rondineli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 05:20 AM   #16
Kneecough
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,792
Unrelated to this thread, I ordered a set of QC35s this morning. Can’t speak to them yet but I have only heard good things. Comfort is most important to me... got em for a good deal so I’m sure I’ll be happy with them.
Kneecough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 05:41 AM   #17
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
I got rid of my Bose because they were not comfortable for extended wear. My B&O H9's are the most comfortable headphones I have ever had.

I agree on the Bose cushions. Mine were ready to be replaced when i moved on from them. Its synthetic leather, so maybe that is why?
Yep synthetic leather.

I tried a friend's pair of B&O H7 headphones, the build and sound quality is sublime, I just don't like the way it fits. I prefer Bose.

I only have the audio headphones from Bose (first and second gen around ear) and I'm pretty happy with them. Have had my first pair almost 8 years now.

For in-ear buds I use Shure, better cable, passive noise cancelling and better sound quality.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2017, 08:39 AM   #18
Bluside
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bluside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,063
OP here...Thanks for the replies. It helped with my decision.

I just ordered the new QC35.
Bluside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 11:28 AM   #19
tng11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
I got rid of my Bose because they were not comfortable for extended wear. My B&O H9's are the most comfortable headphones I have ever had.

I agree on the Bose cushions. Mine were ready to be replaced when i moved on from them. Its synthetic leather, so maybe that is why?
Hmph. I had the H9's and I found them to be very uncomfortable, and were squeezing my head. They also didn't hold well on my head while at the gym. Returned them after a week and went back to the QC35s. The H9's sound quality was better though.
tng11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 04:20 PM   #20
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by tng11 View Post
Hmph. I had the H9's and I found them to be very uncomfortable, and were squeezing my head. They also didn't hold well on my head while at the gym. Returned them after a week and went back to the QC35s. The H9's sound quality was better though.
its like buying shoes I suppose. It all depends on how they fit and they don't fit everyone the same. Headphones should also not be bought without trying on first.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 04:57 PM   #21
Canook
"TRF" Member
 
Canook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Jason
Location: Aussie/Malaysia
Watch: too many to list
Posts: 1,470
ive been through most brands of NC headphones as i refuse to fly without them...
Bose over ear- fantastic NC.. not so great sound quality ...comfort excellent.. build quality ok
Sennheiser NC. noise cancelling ok(not as good as the Bose) comfort excellent.. build quality not what i expected from Sennheiser.. below Bose
Bose in ear.. NC excellent.. sound quality good except when low frequencies hit them and they cancel themselves and make all sort of pop's and farts...comfort very good.. build quality excellent
Sony MDR1000x- NC excellent, sound quality excellent, build quality excellent... bluetooth excellent... only thing i can fault the the touch controls on the side are a bit hit and miss

When i fly i take the In ear Bose and the Sony's now.... i tend to use the sony for watching movies and listening to music, the bose in ear i use for sleeping lol!

the only thing i cant seem to find is a bluetooth adaptor i can plug into the plane so i can use the Sony cable free...... cant seem to source one in this part of the world
__________________
Current lineup
-116610LV Sub
-16233 Tapestry Datejust
-16610LV KERMIT
-116600 SD4000....16612 Yachtmaster- 16710 PEPSI
-216570(polar)
-
-Yachtmaster II 116688 126300 Datejust 41 jubilee

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
Canook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 07:39 PM   #22
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syed117 View Post
Have that 35s as well.

They are great for one reason, the overall comfort. Very lightweight and comfortable.

I think they sound like trash though. The Sony 1000 are much better. Especially the new version.

I think the sonys are $350.

Have a bunch of headphones.
Thank you for the info Syed, you clearly have a thing for headphones. I will buy the Sony
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2017, 10:21 PM   #23
Syed117
"TRF" Member
 
Syed117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
Thank you for the info Syed, you clearly have a thing for headphones. I will buy the Sony
Do try them both on and give them a listen if you can.

I was a bit harsh and sound can be very subjective. Plus so many other factors come into play when comparing headphones (wired, bluetooth, source) The QC35s are very comfortable and overall I do think they are good. You might just like sound from the Bose and the comfort might win you over.
Syed117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 01:56 AM   #24
NothingToSeeHere
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 159
I have both. Get the 35s. They’re not quite as loud (music) as the 25s but they’re good enough and the wireless feature is great.
NothingToSeeHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 03:19 AM   #25
cruise_bone
"TRF" Member
 
cruise_bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 982
I recently got the QuietControl 30's and are crazy mad about them.
They are AWESOME!!
So much less bulk, so much more comfort over a long wearing session, such as an International flight. So much less room taken up on the carry-on.

https://www.bose.com/en_us/products/...l#v=qc30_black
cruise_bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 03:40 AM   #26
SG56
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
SG56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
I love mine!
I've had bose before, wired, lasted quite a while.
I listen to a lot of audiobooks and use mine a lot.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version

Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14
SG56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 04:04 AM   #27
SpeedyTuomas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Finland
Posts: 595
I have Bose QC35 - they are excellent but the noise cancellation is not as strong as I believed when I bought them. However the comfort, battery life (20 hrs) and general quality feel are superb. I would choose the QC35 (not II) over the 25 model. I have not used the Sony ones as I believe Boses are the originals.

Also, the headphones come in a handy pouch which also fits my phone and passport so it is ideal for travel.

In short: get the 35 model, it's worth the extra.
SpeedyTuomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 04:13 AM   #28
cda555
"TRF" Member
 
cda555's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Watch: GMT IIc and PO
Posts: 1,638
I'm so glad I am not an audiophile. I really mean that. I feel bad for the people who have really sensitive/perceptive hearing because it gets expensive. I love my QC35s and my Apple Airpods. They sound great to me.
cda555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 04:35 AM   #29
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by cda555 View Post
I'm so glad I am not an audiophile. I really mean that. I feel bad for the people who have really sensitive/perceptive hearing because it gets expensive. I love my QC35s and my Apple Airpods. They sound great to me.
in truth, using standard digital audio files its harder to tell the difference. Once you get into analog thats where you can tell difference in speakers/headphones. To a lesser extent you can tell when you are listening to digital files depending how they are compressed.

If the underlying digital audio file isn't good then better headphones won't matter. Also, headphones that are bass heavy i tend to be skeptical of. Everyone seems to like bass but it masks poor performance in the midrange and highs. So basically with a great pair of headphones, you will hear all kinds of notes and depth you never heard before because the bass headphones drowned it out and you never knew that part of the music was even there.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2017, 04:59 AM   #30
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
even lossless codecs through poor dacs will sound terrible.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.