ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jeffgordon24 · 22 June 2012, 12:16 PM

here is a picture of my explorer 2 i got it as a present from my dad i love this watch although i did have problems with the crown screwing in it had to be repaired twice. i got it in 2000 and have since replaced the band with the new version

z32turbo · 22 June 2012, 12:50 PM

Mr. RoC · 22 June 2012, 12:58 PM

And for your viewing pleasure and a bit of fun and giggles... Just for Laughs

jeffgordon24 · 22 June 2012, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. RoC

And for your viewing pleasure and a bit of fun and giggles... Just for Laughs

love it

Adam K. · 5 July 2012, 02:03 PM

Now, the photo is not super clear, BUT....

crown guards look....super weird: the case in general looks too fat and the guards do not show the differentiation from the lugs that is normal. A few other details look odd as well, including the bezel markings which appear much closer to the edge than you'll see on a 16570 and the "Swiss Made" signature at 6 o'clock is awfully high up compared to what you'll see on an OEM Rolex Exp II dial.

I hate to do this to anyone's post, but 'eff it, here it is: the pictured watch looks like an impostor (fake) to me.

sea-dweller · 5 July 2012, 02:11 PM

Congrats!

Psmith · 8 July 2012, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam K.

Now, the photo is not super clear, BUT....

crown guards look....super weird: the case in general looks too fat and the guards do not show the differentiation from the lugs that is normal. A few other details look odd as well, including the bezel markings which appear much closer to the edge than you'll see on a 16570 and the "Swiss Made" signature at 6 o'clock is awfully high up compared to what you'll see on an OEM Rolex Exp II dial.

I hate to do this to anyone's post, but 'eff it, here it is: the pictured watch looks like an impostor (fake) to me.

It does look a little odd, but the photo is so blurry...

@OP - please could you post some clearer pics?

bsandiford · 10 July 2012, 08:38 PM

I have to agree..it does look strange......for me there is too much spacing between the 'six' marker and the bottom of the face. I hope I'm wrong

22 June 2012, 12:50 PM	#2
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	__________________ Instagram @z32turbo

22 June 2012, 12:58 PM	#3
Mr. RoC "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Canada Watch: where you're going Posts: 277	And for your viewing pleasure and a bit of fun and giggles... Just for Laughs __________________ 1993 Tag Heuer S/EL Professional 200 Two-Tone (SOLD) 1997 Omega Seamaster Professional Mid-Size 1120 cal. (SOLD) 2012 Rolex Explorer 39mm 214270 2012 G-Shock GW-2310FB-1 2013 Rolex Submariner Date 116610LN

5 July 2012, 02:03 PM	#5
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	Now, the photo is not super clear, BUT.... crown guards look....super weird: the case in general looks too fat and the guards do not show the differentiation from the lugs that is normal. A few other details look odd as well, including the bezel markings which appear much closer to the edge than you'll see on a 16570 and the "Swiss Made" signature at 6 o'clock is awfully high up compared to what you'll see on an OEM Rolex Exp II dial. I hate to do this to anyone's post, but 'eff it, here it is: the pictured watch looks like an impostor (fake) to me.

5 July 2012, 02:11 PM	#6
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Congrats!

10 July 2012, 08:38 PM	#8
bsandiford "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Sydney Posts: 55	I have to agree..it does look strange......for me there is too much spacing between the 'six' marker and the bottom of the face. I hope I'm wrong

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)