The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex WatchTech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 December 2019, 12:46 PM   #1
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
RSC did an unauthorized switch of Bezel Inserts

Man, RSC servicing just keeps paying dividends...some of you may remember the problems I went through with my 14060 and RSC. If not, you can read it here:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=637700

So to add to that thread, this 14060 had to go BACK to RSC AGAIN because the watch would sometimes stop when screwing the crown down. Consistently enough for me to be able to do it after a few attempts.

Once again, it disappeared into the RSC black hole for some time and it came back not too long ago with, as per usual, absolutely no information on what was done and/or replaced. When I got it back, I was able to get it to do the first time I tried but then I couldn't get it to do it again after that so I'm going to call that a fluke but I'm still not 100% that they fixed the problem.

Today, I was looking at some older photos of the watch and I realized something. RSC swapped out my perfectly good bezel insert with a service insert! This swap was completely unauthorized and, as a matter of fact, when they did the estimate, they suggested new insert and I SPECIFICALLY said NO. It appears that they did it on the first trip to RSC and I didn't notice probably because I specifically told them not to replace it (and I figured they wouldn't do that w/o charging me) and I was busy trying to deal with their incompetent servicing (not to mention that it was in RSC's possession for a good chunk of the year).

So what's the big deal you ask? The older insert was a era correct "flat four" (this was a one owner, never service 14060 when I purchased it). I get that it's not a 16610LV level "F4" bezel but that's not the point. The older insert was in perfect shape and it was era correct insert. Why would anyone change that?

For those with any inside knowledge (SearChart maybe?), what are the chances that RSC will be able to make this right and either recovering my insert or finding a suitable replacement?

I'm still trying to figure out why this would happen but I have my suspicions. Note that the RSC service manager was not able to find any notes on this being done (officially) but they were able to look up the infil and exfil photos and saw the insert was indeed swapped.
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2019, 03:48 PM   #2
Gmt21
"TRF" Member
 
Gmt21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex 1665
Posts: 295
You need to make a big stink, ask to see the incoming and outgoing photos (they take them) - show them a photo of watch before service. I had a similar problem on a vintage cream dial explorer.....when I got it back from service they had changed the original tritium seconds hand to luminova!!! I had said change nothing. It took some months and a lot of back and forth, but the photos proved that the watch arrived original and left with a service hand. RSC Dallas messed up but they located a correct and matching seconds hand. Good luck
Gmt21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2019, 04:45 AM   #3
Mr Perfect
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Watch: IC Title
Posts: 102
Oh my god

RSC will still have your old insert. Just ask them to swap it back.
Mr Perfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2019, 02:08 PM   #4
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
The Service Manager has already confirmed that their incoming and outgoing photos don't match. Hopefully RSC will make this right but I SERIOUSLY have my doubts. I've never dealt with such an incompetent service center. I wouldn't expect this from Rolex.

Mr. Perfect, do you not feel that this is a big deal?
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2019, 10:03 PM   #5
gpf
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Real Name: jorje
Location: USA
Watch: My late fathers DD
Posts: 37
What RSC ??????
gpf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2019, 10:29 PM   #6
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpf View Post
What RSC ??????
X 2

Also RSC Toronto provides a detailed estimate of the work to be done with sign off before anything is done.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2019, 10:32 PM   #7
VintageVagabound
"TRF" Member
 
VintageVagabound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 568
They change it because they think they’re doing you a favor by making your watch look as new as possible. This is why you shouldn’t send a vintage (or near vintage) watch to them. How many times has somebody asked to keep the tritium hands or not polish and they do it anyway.

In your case I hope they can at least return the original insert to you since you asked that it not be replaced but you’re not the first and won’t be the last that deals with these issues
VintageVagabound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2019, 12:11 AM   #8
GreatScott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: In a house
Posts: 832
They probably damaged it so they changed it out for free, thinking they were doing the right thing.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
GreatScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2019, 06:18 AM   #9
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
This was sent to Lititz, PA. They said that they would send back a period correct one but I'm still not happy about that. This was a one owner, never serviced all original watch.

Yeah, one of my theories is that they did damage or break it on removal. When I sent it in, the insert was definitely not damaged in any way. It wasn't new, but it was in mint condition. There was absolutely no reason to change it... I even stated that when I first got the estimate when they suggested a new insert.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. :/
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2019, 06:42 AM   #10
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
Jeebus.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2019, 09:53 PM   #11
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,238
I suggest you learn to repair watches so you need never run the risk of a mistake ever happening again.

Seriously though, a mistake happened (as someone else said most likely the old insert was accidentally damaged), and a solution has been proposed. Crisis over.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2019, 09:11 AM   #12
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
I suggest you learn to repair watches so you need never run the risk of a mistake ever happening again.

Seriously though, a mistake happened (as someone else said most likely the old insert was accidentally damaged), and a solution has been proposed. Crisis over.
Hypothetically if the original insert was damaged, and we don't truly know there is absolutely no reason why RSC couldn't provide an explanation. Especially since the OP insisted on wanting to keep his period correct original insert. We are talking about an aluminum bezel insert here. How would a professional watchmaker damage one anyway? Unless he was ham handed. Plenty of folks here have removed and installed the older 5 digit bezels as a DIY procedure. Personally I would be pissed myself.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2019, 12:09 PM   #13
kyo86sg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 58
I hope RSC can provide a proper and reasonable explanation otherwise just write a complaint email to Rolex HQ in swiss.

I would be frustrated as well.
kyo86sg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2019, 12:38 PM   #14
Anamelistic
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Seiko SKX007
Posts: 64
Excuse my ignorance but I'm still new here, are there any other watchmakers you could send to that are trusted in order to have your Rolex serviced? It sounds like it was well out of warranty anyway so would a place like RolliWorks (or whatever) would have been able to fix an issue like this??
Anamelistic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2019, 01:13 PM   #15
Robtayham
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
Man, RSC servicing just keeps paying dividends...some of you may remember the problems I went through with my 14060 and RSC. If not, you can read it here:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=637700

So to add to that thread, this 14060 had to go BACK to RSC AGAIN because the watch would sometimes stop when screwing the crown down. Consistently enough for me to be able to do it after a few attempts.

Once again, it disappeared into the RSC black hole for some time and it came back not too long ago with, as per usual, absolutely no information on what was done and/or replaced. When I got it back, I was able to get it to do the first time I tried but then I couldn't get it to do it again after that so I'm going to call that a fluke but I'm still not 100% that they fixed the problem.

Today, I was looking at some older photos of the watch and I realized something. RSC swapped out my perfectly good bezel insert with a service insert! This swap was completely unauthorized and, as a matter of fact, when they did the estimate, they suggested new insert and I SPECIFICALLY said NO. It appears that they did it on the first trip to RSC and I didn't notice probably because I specifically told them not to replace it (and I figured they wouldn't do that w/o charging me) and I was busy trying to deal with their incompetent servicing (not to mention that it was in RSC's possession for a good chunk of the year).

So what's the big deal you ask? The older insert was a era correct "flat four" (this was a one owner, never service 14060 when I purchased it). I get that it's not a 16610LV level "F4" bezel but that's not the point. The older insert was in perfect shape and it was era correct insert. Why would anyone change that?

For those with any inside knowledge (SearChart maybe?), what are the chances that RSC will be able to make this right and either recovering my insert or finding a suitable replacement?

I'm still trying to figure out why this would happen but I have my suspicions. Note that the RSC service manager was not able to find any notes on this being done (officially) but they were able to look up the infil and exfil photos and saw the insert was indeed swapped.
You know, things happen. Talk to Rolex and work out a solution.

It’s not like the watch was 100% original. So, it won’t hurt the value to install another era correct bezel.
Robtayham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2019, 07:46 PM   #16
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
I suggest you learn to repair watches so you need never run the risk of a mistake ever happening again.

Seriously though, a mistake happened (as someone else said most likely the old insert was accidentally damaged), and a solution has been proposed. Crisis over.
If this was just a single issue, I could excuse it as human error...but MULTIPLE mistakes on the same watch? Where's Rolex's QC? Where's the watchmaker's own personal QC? The solution proposed doesn't make it whole as I've explained previously. And going back to the intial problem (a poor service job), was there ANY QC? How does a customer end up with a poorly serviced watch? Did they not check it at the service center before it shipped out? Why didn't the local RSC check it before handing it to the customer? I think their MO is to do a half-ass job from the get go and just hope that the customer doesn't have a way to double check their work and/or won't notice. And if something does go wrong, they hide behind their wall of no information. To me, it seems like it's more about turnover, not quality. As for the insert, I have a suspicion that it wasn't damaged or change by "mistake", it was done on purpose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robtayham View Post
It’s not like the watch was 100% original. So, it won’t hurt the value to install another era correct bezel.
Actually, it was 100% original, one owner as I stated previously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyo86sg View Post
I hope RSC can provide a proper and reasonable explanation otherwise just write a complaint email to Rolex HQ in swiss.
Based on previous dealings, I doubt they're going to explain anything. When they had to re-service the watch, the invoice only said "Check Movement". When they had to fix the movement stopping issue, they only said "Check Movement". Lol, RSC wants to keep you the dark as much as possible. I have absolutely no idea what they did to fix the previous issues and I'm sure they won't provide any info on this issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anamelistic View Post
Excuse my ignorance but I'm still new here, are there any other watchmakers you could send to that are trusted in order to have your Rolex serviced? It sounds like it was well out of warranty anyway so would a place like RolliWorks (or whatever) would have been able to fix an issue like this??
Yes, there are other watch service centers what work on Rolex watches but Rolex make it tough on these independents by highly restricting their ability to obtain parts for repair and in turn, makes the parts expensive for the customer. Basically they're creating a situation so that you're FORCED to go through RSC and RSC only. Yes, the watch's original warranty was long expired. If you read the other thread (in the first post), you'll see how this all started. This bezel insert issue is just ANOTHER issue I'm having with RSC...all on the same watch.

In retrospect, I ABSOLUTELY should have sent it to Rolliworks (or another independent) instead and for any future services (outside of in-warranty issues), I have no plans to send anything to RSC. They've proven that their QC is lacking (and that's being very generous)
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2019, 07:07 AM   #17
Rolex tom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: London, England
Watch: rolex,seiko,Omega
Posts: 189
Well that sucks. I would say though that the bezel insert was more than likely damaged when removing it or by some other means and they just swapped it out without giving a second thought. They should however of informed you the customer of this. I doubt they changed it for the sake it, no big watch house is just gives away a free bezel insert and spends the time changing it for nothing. As for you first experience with the watch not performing as it should that’s just poor workmanship in my opinion
Rolex tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2019, 12:07 PM   #18
Robtayham
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
Actually, it was 100% original, one owner as I stated previously.
My bad. I define ‘era correct’ as a bezel that is correct for the era, but not originally installed on the watch. In other words, new old stock. That’s different than original ‘born on the watch’ bezel. And it’s also different than new authentic Rolex bezel.

Also, the fact that it’s ‘one owner’ has no bearing on anything. If that owner told you ‘era correct’, then he meant it wasn’t originally on the watch when it was manufactured. So, did he use that defined term, or did you use it by mistake?
Robtayham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2019, 04:47 PM   #19
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robtayham View Post
My bad. I define ‘era correct’ as a bezel that is correct for the era, but not originally installed on the watch. In other words, new old stock. That’s different than original ‘born on the watch’ bezel. And it’s also different than new authentic Rolex bezel.

Also, the fact that it’s ‘one owner’ has no bearing on anything. If that owner told you ‘era correct’, then he meant it wasn’t originally on the watch when it was manufactured. So, did he use that defined term, or did you use it by mistake?
Yeah that was my bad then. It was original to the watch. The original owner never changed anything on the watch nor did he have anyone work on the watch.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex tom View Post
I doubt they changed it for the sake it, no big watch house is just gives away a free bezel insert and spends the time changing it for nothing. As for you first experience with the watch not performing as it should that’s just poor workmanship in my opinion
Well I wonder how "secure" those old parts are once they leave the watch and to what extent the techs can "retain" parts for their own use. I find it hard to believe that Rolex trained watchmaker could break an aluminum insert that a ton of "non-tech" watch owners seem to able to install and remove with ease (myself included).
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2019, 07:47 PM   #20
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
Well I wonder how "secure" those old parts are once they leave the watch and to what extent the techs can "retain" parts for their own use. I find it hard to believe that Rolex trained watchmaker could break an aluminum insert that a ton of "non-tech" watch owners seem to able to install and remove with ease (myself included).
When a service centre handles thousands of watches a year there will statistically be some casualties due to heavy handedness and some due to existing damage (such as chips or cracks that are impossible to see when the part is fitted). It is a near certainty this is what happened.

You seem pretty convinced it was theft...why?

Why would someone risk their career over stealing a customer's bezel insert? Even if someone wanted a period correct one for themselves hundreds of them per year end up in the bin where the owner has agreed to change the insert*, why would anybody steal yours?

To suggest theft without a shred of evidence is petty at best and malicious at worst.

*To be clear, I am not suggesting that this is common practice, simply that anybody with even just two brain cells would do this over stealing from a customer. The amount of trust placed in watchmakers and technicians is something we do not take for granted. No trust; no job!
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2019, 09:47 PM   #21
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
Why would someone risk their career over stealing a customer's bezel insert? Even if someone wanted a period correct one for themselves hundreds of them per year end up in the bin where the owner has agreed to change the insert*, why would anybody steal yours?
You seem pretty convinced that all watch techs are saints.

I've had ASC service techs (automotive) try to steal valve caps off my car. I mean freakin' tire valve caps. They are factory aluminum ones and the tech tried to swap them with plastic ones. When I went back, they didn't dig them out of the trash, they went into the back room and "recovered" them. So if there are people willing to steal $12.00 valve cap covers (yes, twelve dollars), I would image there are crooked watch techs that are willing to do you a favor by replacing your 20 year old, mint condition, but apparently "outdated" $$$$ vintage (or vintage adjacent) inserts for shiny brand new service replacements ones cuz you know those are in high demand.

I'm not saying that this *is* what happened, but I think it's as plausible as a Rolex trained tech (aren't they CW21's?) damaging a insert during service.
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2019, 04:48 AM   #22
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
You seem pretty convinced that all watch techs are saints.

I've had ASC service techs (automotive) try to steal valve caps off my car. I mean freakin' tire valve caps. They are factory aluminum ones and the tech tried to swap them with plastic ones. When I went back, they didn't dig them out of the trash, they went into the back room and "recovered" them. So if there are people willing to steal $12.00 valve cap covers (yes, twelve dollars), I would image there are crooked watch techs that are willing to do you a favor by replacing your 20 year old, mint condition, but apparently "outdated" $$$$ vintage (or vintage adjacent) inserts for shiny brand new service replacements ones cuz you know those are in high demand.

I'm not saying that this *is* what happened, but I think it's as plausible as a Rolex trained tech (aren't they CW21's?) damaging a insert during service.
Not suggesting there won’t be a few bad apples. But it is incredibly unlikely someone would choose to steal something from a customer when they could pick the same thing out of the bin/scrap parts box. (Unless they want to get caught eventually. Perhaps they have a Thomas Crown type character working there)

No degree of training prevents all unintended breakages. And that is assuming it was the watchmaker/technicians fault to begin with. Many parts can cool structurally sound until you proceed to disassemble it further.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2019, 06:55 AM   #23
R G
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
When a service centre handles thousands of watches a year there will statistically be some casualties due to heavy handedness and some due to existing damage (such as chips or cracks that are impossible to see when the part is fitted). It is a near certainty this is what happened.

You seem pretty convinced it was theft...why?

Why would someone risk their career over stealing a customer's bezel insert? Even if someone wanted a period correct one for themselves hundreds of them per year end up in the bin where the owner has agreed to change the insert*, why would anybody steal yours?

To suggest theft without a shred of evidence is petty at best and malicious at worst.

*To be clear, I am not suggesting that this is common practice, simply that anybody with even just two brain cells would do this over stealing from a customer. The amount of trust placed in watchmakers and technicians is something we do not take for granted. No trust; no job!
Firstly, come on, I don’t think for one second that, anyone, at RSC would be worried about losing their job - Rolex service centre seem to be a law on to their own and well and truly up their own arses to give a flying one about the repercussions.

Secondly, it’s fantastic that you feel the way you do about clients trust and poor job, no job ethos. Sadly, I don’t think that’s shared within RSC.

Your sentiments about casualties within statistics wouldn’t wash with me. I’d love to have RSC advise me of those findings.
R G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2019, 07:17 PM   #24
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Just for reference, here's what the original insert looked like when it was turn into RSC. As you can clearly see, so much wear and tear that it OBVIOUSLY was in DIRE need of replacement...

__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 08:04 AM   #25
Mr Perfect
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Watch: IC Title
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
Just for reference, here's what the original insert looked like when it was turn into RSC. As you can clearly see, so much wear and tear that it OBVIOUSLY was in DIRE need of replacement...

It does look quite badly scratched in fairness. RSC did you a favour - I would accept the gesture and move on
Mr Perfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 08:10 AM   #26
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Perfect View Post
It does look quite badly scratched in fairness. RSC did you a favour - I would accept the gesture and move on
LOL. RSC definitely didn't do me a favor.
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 08:18 AM   #27
Mr Perfect
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Watch: IC Title
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
LOL. RSC definitely didn't do me a favor.
Boo hoo.
Mr Perfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 09:34 AM   #28
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116710er View Post
This was sent to Lititz, PA. They said that they would send back a period correct one but I'm still not happy about that. This was a one owner, never serviced all original watch.

Yeah, one of my theories is that they did damage or break it on removal. When I sent it in, the insert was definitely not damaged in any way. It wasn't new, but it was in mint condition. There was absolutely no reason to change it... I even stated that when I first got the estimate when they suggested a new insert.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. :/
Isn’t the Lititz RSC essentially a ‘training’ center for future Rolex watchmakers? I would never send my watch there for that reason alone.
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 10:26 AM   #29
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronricks View Post
Isn’t the Lititz RSC essentially a ‘training’ center for future Rolex watchmakers? I would never send my watch there for that reason alone.
Downstairs is the training center for both students and those gaining Rolex certs. Upstairs is the RSC, where students have absolutely no access granted. The chance of a student working on a customer's watch is zero.

Lititz RSC is where Rolex USA sends nearly all 4030/4130 calibers for service.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2019, 11:08 AM   #30
116710er
"TRF" Member
 
116710er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: 'murica
Watch: yer six.
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Perfect View Post
Boo hoo.
So you'd be ok with RSC changing out parts of value on your watch and replace them with parts are much less value without your express permission? Lol...new guy...
__________________
"Change friends. Keep Comex." -Haywood_Milton
116710er is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.