ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

roadie1 · 6 September 2011, 01:32 AM

If you had to choose only one?

sea-dweller · 6 September 2011, 01:37 AM

SD for me...

R S · 6 September 2011, 01:38 AM

dweller!!!

Dan2010 · 6 September 2011, 01:41 AM

Dweller.

Gerardus · 6 September 2011, 01:41 AM

SubC 100%

Mickey® · 6 September 2011, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadie1

If you had to choose only one?

SD No Doubt...

drahthaar · 6 September 2011, 01:44 AM

Sub C. I have had mine for a week and I love it!

Melanotaenia · 6 September 2011, 01:47 AM

Sea Dweller; you can always get a new Sub later

bird11 · 6 September 2011, 01:48 AM

I did like the Sub C but I'm happier with the SD. Also, my philosophy is that Sea Dwellers may be harder and harder to come by, in good condition anyway. The new style models will not be hard to find preowned. Let me know if you need more info.

Kanger · 6 September 2011, 01:51 AM

Not even close. Classic SD everyday of the week.

chillviper · 6 September 2011, 01:53 AM

Sd!

MortgageGuy · 6 September 2011, 01:54 AM

BOTH

I love the SD, you will not have any regrets. Plus add to the fact that it is discontinued and will only get more and more difficult to find one in excellent condition... The Sub C will be around and made for years to come

Hkspwrsche · 6 September 2011, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadie1

If you had to choose only one?

Can't beat the SD

warren G. · 6 September 2011, 02:02 AM

Sd 100%

Eric88 · 6 September 2011, 02:07 AM

Sea Dweller all the way.

watchmaniac · 6 September 2011, 02:09 AM

Sea dweller. It's classic.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Art 1 · 6 September 2011, 02:11 AM

Easily the SD. I would never buy a Subc.

chicagofan · 6 September 2011, 02:14 AM

SD now. Sub C later.

Watch Fan · 6 September 2011, 02:15 AM

Sea Dweller

watchdaddy1 · 6 September 2011, 02:15 AM

I had to make the same choice last month..In the end the SD won ...
NO REGRETS @ ALL......

stoner97 · 6 September 2011, 02:15 AM

Sd

skyedog · 6 September 2011, 02:34 AM

Tool watch 101 = SD

Honestly you can't go wrong on either one!

43builder · 6 September 2011, 02:50 AM

SD For me. you'll save about 2,000 and, unlike the sub c, the dweller is a better investment. both are nice though

jmsrolls · 6 September 2011, 02:51 AM

Sea-Dweller = THE Rolex diver!

Rolex ceramic bezels =

Fr. John†

warrior · 6 September 2011, 02:52 AM

Not even close for me. The SD....less common, no fat lugs, more character IMO than the shiny Sub C.

One thing that never gets mentioned on forums is that the SD suffers LEAST ( of all the Rolex divers) from Rolex disease--the glare on the crystal. Though it also does not have A/R coating on the underside, the dial is "most" clear from all angles...I think it has to do with the smaller diameter of the flat crystal and perhaps due to the thickness as well. I've compared the SD to the Sub ND and Sub Date and Sub-C quite a few times and the glare is least noticeable on the SD. ( Most noticeable on the Sub ND) This is another reason to love the SD.

ZackAaron · 6 September 2011, 02:54 AM

New Ceramic Submariner 100%

zeuloa · 6 September 2011, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 43builder

SD For me. you'll save about 2,000 and, unlike the sub c, the dweller is a better investment. both are nice though

Very valid point! I have SD and love it!

AWS · 6 September 2011, 03:31 AM

Sd

Atomant · 6 September 2011, 03:36 AM

SD

docmarioce · 6 September 2011, 03:37 AM

I like the new Sub C but if I had to chose I'll pick up a SD anytime before a SubC

6 September 2011, 01:32 AM	#1
roadie1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Southeast Watch: Divers, GMT Posts: 2,147	Classic Sea Dweller or Sub C If you had to choose only one?

6 September 2011, 01:38 AM	#3
R S "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Robert Location: N.O.LA. Posts: 475	dweller!!! __________________

6 September 2011, 01:41 AM	#5
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: EU Watch: ♕ Posts: 11,916	SubC 100% __________________ ♕16570 ♕126610 ♕126333

6 September 2011, 01:48 AM	#9
bird11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Brady Location: Chicago Watch: The only one I own Posts: 113	I just sold my 3 week old Sub C to fund a Sea Dweller I did like the Sub C but I'm happier with the SD. Also, my philosophy is that Sea Dwellers may be harder and harder to come by, in good condition anyway. The new style models will not be hard to find preowned. Let me know if you need more info.

6 September 2011, 01:54 AM	#12
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	BOTH I love the SD, you will not have any regrets. Plus add to the fact that it is discontinued and will only get more and more difficult to find one in excellent condition... The Sub C will be around and made for years to come __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

6 September 2011, 01:37 AM	#2
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	SD for me...

6 September 2011, 01:41 AM	#4
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	Dweller.

6 September 2011, 01:44 AM	#7
drahthaar "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: Arizona Watch: Sub-C & SD43 Red Posts: 74	Sub C. I have had mine for a week and I love it!

6 September 2011, 01:47 AM	#8
Melanotaenia "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Jonathan Location: NYC Watch: Explorers and Subs Posts: 620	Sea Dweller; you can always get a new Sub later

6 September 2011, 01:51 AM	#10
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	Not even close. Classic SD everyday of the week.

6 September 2011, 01:53 AM	#11
chillviper "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Atlanta Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 509	Sd!

6 September 2011, 02:02 AM	#14
warren G. "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Duy Location: New Orleans, LA Watch: Speedmaster 3861 Posts: 1,925	Sd 100% __________________ De gustibus non est disputandum.

6 September 2011, 02:07 AM	#15
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,238	Sea Dweller all the way.

6 September 2011, 02:09 AM	#16
watchmaniac "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Michael Location: TEXAS Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 467	Sea dweller. It's classic. Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

6 September 2011, 02:11 AM	#17
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Easily the SD. I would never buy a Subc.

6 September 2011, 02:14 AM	#18
chicagofan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Howard Location: Chicago Posts: 3,588	SD now. Sub C later.

6 September 2011, 02:15 AM	#19
Watch Fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: California Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 676	Sea Dweller __________________ "The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheeze."

6 September 2011, 02:15 AM	#20
watchdaddy1 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: William Location: Az Watch: strap whore Posts: 1,194	I had to make the same choice last month..In the end the SD won ... NO REGRETS @ ALL......

6 September 2011, 02:15 AM	#21
stoner97 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Chris Location: UK Watch: 1680 Posts: 36	Sd

6 September 2011, 02:50 AM	#23
43builder "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Patrick Location: Cleveland/NoVA Watch: 116528 YG Daytona Posts: 808	SD For me. you'll save about 2,000 and, unlike the sub c, the dweller is a better investment. both are nice though __________________ Patrick Lewis Rolex Daytona 18K YG (M97 Serial) Rolex SS DAYTONA (On Order...it'll be a while) Omega Vintage 1970's 617 Movement

6 September 2011, 02:51 AM	#24
jmsrolls Banned Join Date: May 2008 Location: USA Posts: 3,185	Sea-Dweller = THE Rolex diver! Rolex ceramic bezels = Fr. John†

6 September 2011, 02:52 AM	#25
warrior "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: massachusetts Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,673	Not even close for me. The SD....less common, no fat lugs, more character IMO than the shiny Sub C. One thing that never gets mentioned on forums is that the SD suffers LEAST ( of all the Rolex divers) from Rolex disease--the glare on the crystal. Though it also does not have A/R coating on the underside, the dial is "most" clear from all angles...I think it has to do with the smaller diameter of the flat crystal and perhaps due to the thickness as well. I've compared the SD to the Sub ND and Sub Date and Sub-C quite a few times and the glare is least noticeable on the SD. ( Most noticeable on the Sub ND) This is another reason to love the SD.

6 September 2011, 02:54 AM	#26
ZackAaron "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Zack Aaron Location: Washington DC Watch: Rolex..... Posts: 58	New Ceramic Submariner 100%

6 September 2011, 03:31 AM	#28
AWS "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Allan Location: USA Posts: 959	Sd

6 September 2011, 03:36 AM	#29
Atomant "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Fernwood Posts: 3,455	SD __________________ 116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80

6 September 2011, 03:37 AM	#30
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	I like the new Sub C but if I had to chose I'll pick up a SD anytime before a SubC __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)