ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 January 2021, 10:31 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Thanks. As you say, it’s not a 16800 face as it would be 1000ft. I’ve also searched online and found 5513 submariner “transitional watch” faces. They have the same design face as my watch, particularly with the raised white gold edging on the hour marks. But again, they have 1000ft. Some of the 5513s even have “Swiss Made” at the bottom (but not “T Swiss Made T”). It seems from some replies that the dial I have is fake, while other people say it could be a real service replacement, as Rolex came up with many different service replacements. In the end, I think I will search and buy a real 1971 Red Submariner Mark IV dial, which appears to be the type that this watch would have had. Many thanks for your advice! |
|
8 January 2021, 12:27 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Filipe
Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah
Watch: Never too many
Posts: 1,898
|
OP, can't you dig up some pictures from the seventies?
You might be able to find out what the watch really looked like! Good luck David! |
8 January 2021, 01:30 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,907
|
Sounds like it was just serviced by an AD's in-house watchmaker, not actually RSC. Many of them don't know much about vintage, and there seems to be no question that the dial is after-market. I'd suggest that you simply listen to what the experts are telling you; they have looked at thousands of dials and they know the features of all legit dials, original or service. Based on your comments about Submariner dials, it's clear you are fairly new to it.
Installing an original red 1680 dial sounds like a great idea hypothetically, but I don't think that they are easily found, and the price might be a bit shocking. Keep us updated.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
8 January 2021, 02:15 PM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
|
I would love to have a red submariner case in search of a dial, but I really wouldn't want to pony up the 15k for that dial.
|
8 January 2021, 03:42 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
8 January 2021, 03:48 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
8 January 2021, 03:50 PM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Thanks, cost is an issue. Given all the great advice here around it being a fake dial and hands, I’ll keep my eye out and be hopeful... (maybe naive) Cheers, David |
|
8 January 2021, 03:59 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Thanks and yes, I’m very new to this. I’ve had the watch for over ten years, literally in its box in my wardrobe. I’ve done nothing with it until Nov last year when I was talking to a friend who collects watches and he suggested I look into it, so here I am. It was my Dad’s second Rolex, the first wore out as it was a working diving watch. He gave it to my sister and the cost to repair was prohibitive. She sold it to a collector, years ago. If only I’d known about the aftermarket then... Anyways, I’ll keep my eye out for a real Red 1680 Mark IV dial and hands, and one day aim to repair it back to its former glory. It would be a lovely heirloom to my kids. Many thanks! |
|
8 January 2021, 04:00 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
8 January 2021, 04:01 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
|
|
8 January 2021, 04:04 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
8 January 2021, 04:05 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
8 January 2021, 04:20 PM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA!!
Watch: ing Warriors ball
Posts: 710
|
|
8 January 2021, 08:49 PM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
Dont discount the option of a genuine service dial. Theres no shame in that. Unless youre a collector, Im not sure why youd want to put a USD12-15k dial in thats not original to the watch (other that it looking awesome). Its still your dads watch. Id also suggest doing a bit of research on vintage Rolex specialists nearby. I dont fest a good feeling from your current RSC experience. Did they give you the old date wheel back? |
|
9 January 2021, 01:36 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
|
|
9 January 2021, 01:48 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,015
|
The box and papers and any other paraphernalia associated with the watch will increase it's value, as I said befor the case looks very nice although the bezel is badly worn and needs replaced. In my opinion sourcing the correct dial and a fresh bezel is makes economic sense even if a good condition mk4 dial is not cheap. Full set 1680's in the condition your watch would be after a new dial and bezel are installed are highly sought after.
|
9 January 2021, 04:17 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
Case looks pretty soft to me. See you seeing something Im not? |
|
9 January 2021, 05:34 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
|
|
9 January 2021, 05:34 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
|
9 January 2021, 05:43 AM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
When I came into the forum I knew it was not an original 1680 dial. I didn’t know whether it was a fake or a genuine service replacement. The advice on the thread is mixed. Some say it could be a genuine service dial and others are passionate that it’s fake. If it’s fake, then I’m not interested in it’s origin, but if it’s an authentic, it would be incredible to find it’s origin as the watch would be truely unique. Alas, based on my research and other’s advice, it’s probably fake. As you suggest, I’ll continue to research and talk to other collectors. Maybe something will pop up. It does look good in it’s current form and with the estimated costs of real 1680 dials from the era being upwards of $10k, it won’t be replaced anytime soon. Regarding your question on the date roller. There was none. It had been removed over 20 years ago. That was one of the reasons I had it serviced. Remember, this was very much a diver’s working watch, worn pretty much everyday underwater. Last night I went through Dad’s old diaries from 1962-1980 to see if he had written when be bought it (no evidence). I was astounded at the amount of daily underwater work he did, on ships, wharfs, cables, harbours, power stations etc. It must have been pretty badly beaten up. Now people seem to wear these for their look. Irony... Cheers |
|
9 January 2021, 06:03 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CNY
Watch: TOG
Posts: 580
|
A lot of history with this watch. Maybe leave it as is?
|
9 January 2021, 06:59 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
OP this thread may help you with the service dials and within it are links to other threads re original White dials. As has been said by others and hopefully as the thread shows, the dial is not a Rolex service dial. Good luck in your hunt to enhance your Father's watch
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=513941 |
7 December 2021, 05:50 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Update on the watch
Hi everyone,
My name is David Strong from Wellington, New Zealand. I'm adding to this thread as: I have recently sent the watch to a Rolex repairer in Auckland New Zealand and asked him to take the case off and photograph the back of the dial, as I wanted to see if it was real or fake. The back of the dial and inside of the watch are new photos. My apologies for the quality of the photos, I can only work with what he sent me. You'll see that the back of the dial has "Singer" on it. The Rolex repairer has concluded that it's a genuine Singer dial. (I can only believe what he has told me). If anyone here has any information that may help me find out the possible year the dial was made, I'd greatly appreciate it. Please know that I have no intention of selling this watch as it's a family heirloom. Kind Regards, David |
7 December 2021, 05:55 AM | #54 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
|
Quote:
|
|
7 December 2021, 06:16 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
Hi Andy,
Yes, I seem to be doing a horrible job using threads, sorry about that! I saw the other thread had been closed by someone, I'm unsure why but think it's because I should have stuck with the original thread. So I'm using this one instead. Regards, David |
7 December 2021, 06:17 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
|
The difference is that I've added the two new photos of the inside of the watch , which I've just had taken a few weeks ago.
|
7 December 2021, 08:27 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,511
|
as many of us have said already, the dial is likely a refinish.
Just because the back says "Singer" doesn't say much as they make fake "Singer" plates too. The reality is the dial front side is not of a genuine Rolex variation suggests its likely a refinish. Again, try VRF and see if others have a different perspective but I suspect it'll be the same conclusion. |
8 December 2021, 10:11 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
|
Ok, so the problem here is, you have NOT been to a Rolex Service Center. You've been to either a watchmaker attached to a Rolex dealer (which does NOT make them a Rolex watchmaker), and now someone else in New Zealand who services Rolexes who is also not a Rolex Service Center. No RSC is going to send you photos like that, and no RSC is going to simply "conclude" that a dial is legit because it says Singer on the back of it. It's really either a fake Singer dial, or a complete refinish on an old Singer dial. Also no RSC is going to release a watch in this condition.
The dial and hands are fake, full stop. That's 80%+ value of the watch. The movement is almost irrelevant here. Send it to an actual Rolex Service Center and they will replace all the fake parts and send you back your watch with new service parts. Either that, or just hunt out the original parts on your own, which will be very expensive. |
8 December 2021, 10:48 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 790
|
Quote:
|
|
9 December 2021, 12:37 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,153
|
Unpopular opinion and can not believe I am typing this, but +1 for leaving as is.
I think the watch exudes character, my gut says the dial is some sort of service dial from years past and the bezel with ruby is 'wrong' but sort of organic and great to me. Cool watch! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.