ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Skittman · 15 July 2015, 03:29 AM

Hi all
Thinking of down sizing my collection, currently consisting of SS Daytona, Ceramic Sub Date and YM blue dial.
The trade would involve chopping in the sub and yacht for a new AP royal oak stainless chronograph.
I'm just not getting the wear from 3 watches.
Daytona would become the daily watch, reserving the AP for special occasions.
Thoughts?

ap1 · 15 July 2015, 03:30 AM

why both chronos? id go daytona, RO jumbo

Skittman · 15 July 2015, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

why both chronos? id go daytona, RO jumbo

Sucker for a chrono... Jumbo has crossed my mind but doesn't have the aesthetic appeal for me.

GolfPunk · 15 July 2015, 03:41 AM

I agree with your choice, Daytona and ROO

watchstudent · 15 July 2015, 03:45 AM

Yep I would do that... well to be honest I would keep the Sub and ROC but your way would work!

OmegaJJH · 15 July 2015, 03:49 AM

Think i'd keep the Sub.

thomaspp · 15 July 2015, 03:49 AM

Yes! Sounds good to me. SS Daytona is one of the ones I'll never sell. The AP can be more of an end of week / weekender.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

johneh · 15 July 2015, 03:50 AM

If you want to keep the Daytona, I second going for a non-chrono RO.

I'm not a chrono guy myself so I'd keep the Sub and go with a 15400 (white dial). You'd have a few extra bucks in the bank account if you did that as well!

fai9al · 15 July 2015, 03:50 AM

Sounds like a good plan to me!

Urosfan · 15 July 2015, 03:51 AM

I would do it

Jack T · 15 July 2015, 03:53 AM

You want the Royal Oak, ok, something's got to go. If it were me, the YM. As nice as it is, it loses just by process of elimination. You never discard a Sub, and you're a sucker for chronos. What dial on the Daytona?

dabbotjordan · 15 July 2015, 03:53 AM

Can't see you getting a straight trade,how much cash have you gotta to part with as well?

Personally won't do it in a million years.

Skittman · 15 July 2015, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabbotjordan

can't see you getting a straight trade,how much cash have you gotta to part with as well?

4.5£

Skittman · 15 July 2015, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack T

You want the Royal Oak, ok, something's got to go. If it were me, the YM. As nice as it is, it loses just by process of elimination. You never discard a Sub, and you're a sucker for chronos. What dial on the Daytona?

White dial

dabbotjordan · 15 July 2015, 04:00 AM

At the end of the day,if you are happy with the trade and to top the balance up with cash,go for it!

( I would phone around and see what the trade in is on the RO just for reference,to get an idea of what sort of hit you might take if you ever wanna change again)

superdog · 15 July 2015, 04:03 AM

I don't like AP. I get that they are awesome watches, but I don't like the look.

I would not do this trade.

Skittman · 15 July 2015, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dabbotjordan

At the end of the day,if you are happy with the trade and to top the balance up with cash,go for it!

( I would phone around and see what the trade in is on the RO just for reference,to get an idea of what sort of hit you might take if you ever wanna change again)

Thanks for that. I will certainly do that prior to any deal. Cheers.

brandrea · 15 July 2015, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superdog

I don't like AP. I get that they are awesome watches, but I don't like the look.

I would not do this trade.

Ditto that here

beer · 15 July 2015, 04:09 AM

Quality over quantity imo

Not saying steel Rolexes arent quality

but I would go for 2 $20k watches over 4 $10k watches

especially if collection is not shared with wife or good friends etc and doesnt get wrist time

agsstructures · 15 July 2015, 04:31 AM

I would do it for a jumbo. This is me personally as the newer 26320 ROC is a tad large for my wrist. Also love the history of the Jumbo. Either way I like a little diversity so in your case, if the ROC fits do it!

beshannon · 15 July 2015, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skittman

Hi all
Thinking of down sizing my collection, currently consisting of SS Daytona, Ceramic Sub Date and YM blue dial.
The trade would involve chopping in the sub and yacht for a new AP royal oak stainless chronograph.
I'm just not getting the wear from 3 watches.
Daytona would become the daily watch, reserving the AP for special occasions.
Thoughts?

I would not give up a Sub just to get an AP to "wear on special occasions"

Dump the YM and save for the AP

tkc324 · 15 July 2015, 04:34 AM

I personally love the Daytona and will never trade mine. Totally get "sucker for a chrono" statement as most of my watches have been chronos. I think if I was in your shoe I would be content with Daytona and AP RO. I have the ROO and while I don't wear it all the time, it puts a smile on my face every time that I do... good luck with your trade...

00pumpkin · 15 July 2015, 04:36 AM

If you aren't really wearing the other two then I don't think its a bad idea.

Solo118 · 15 July 2015, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skittman

Hi all
Thinking of down sizing my collection, currently consisting of SS Daytona, Ceramic Sub Date and YM blue dial.
The trade would involve chopping in the sub and yacht for a new AP royal oak stainless chronograph.
I'm just not getting the wear from 3 watches.
Daytona would become the daily watch, reserving the AP for special occasions.
Thoughts?

I think that would be a good move, as you are not wearing the Sub & YM. If you think you will miss them in the slightest way, keep them!

liuk3 · 15 July 2015, 04:43 AM

Just curious for you chrono lovers, what is it you love about them? Do you love the complication? Do you find yourself frequently using it from a practical standpoint, and if so for what purposes?

No disrespect. I do respect and admire the chrono function, but whenever I am about to pull the trigger, I find myself hesitating since I just don't find a practical use for it in my everyday life. Maybe it doesn't matter so long as you appreciate the engineering of such a mechanical complication.

To the OP, seems like you really love your chronos so I would say go with what you love!

watchstudent · 15 July 2015, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liuk3

Just curious for you chrono lovers, what is it you love about them? Do you love the complication? Do you find yourself frequently using it from a practical standpoint, and if so for what purposes?

No disrespect. I do respect and admire the chrono function, but whenever I am about to pull the trigger, I find myself hesitating since I just don't find a practical use for it in my everyday life. Maybe it doesn't matter so long as you appreciate the engineering of such a mechanical complication.

To the OP, seems like you really love your chronos so I would say go with what you love!

For me I like the Sub dials on a lot of chronos, for example there is no contest in which dial i prefer between the AP Royal Oak three hander and the AP chrono. But I do also find myself using the function more than I would expect. When cooking, parking meters... there are more i swear

thomaspp · 15 July 2015, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liuk3

Just curious for you chrono lovers, what is it you love about them? Do you love the complication? Do you find yourself frequently using it from a practical standpoint, and if so for what purposes?

No disrespect. I do respect and admire the chrono function, but whenever I am about to pull the trigger, I find myself hesitating since I just don't find a practical use for it in my everyday life. Maybe it doesn't matter so long as you appreciate the engineering of such a mechanical complication.

To the OP, seems like you really love your chronos so I would say go with what you love!

I've tried to understand it as well, and those little buttons on the side of the case just make WIS go nuts! As simple as that.

KBM · 15 July 2015, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liuk3

Just curious for you chrono lovers, what is it you love about them? Do you love the complication? Do you find yourself frequently using it from a practical standpoint, and if so for what purposes?

No disrespect. I do respect and admire the chrono function, but whenever I am about to pull the trigger, I find myself hesitating since I just don't find a practical use for it in my everyday life. Maybe it doesn't matter so long as you appreciate the engineering of such a mechanical complication.

To the OP, seems like you really love your chronos so I would say go with what you love!

I'm a diver watch/chrono watch lover. For me, the appeal is aesthetic, with the dial counters and pushers. It has very little (perhaps nothing) to do with the actual use of the complication. I also don't buy divers because the bezel rotates, but because I like the look and robustness. The rotating bezel and timing abilities, in both these categories of watches, are just pluses.

KBM · 15 July 2015, 04:52 AM

OP, as per my post above, I would keep a diver and a chrono, for the sake of variety, but to answer the main question, I see no issue in trading 2 for 1, as long as the trade makes sense money-wise. Let go of all rationale and logical advice: which configuration of watches would bring YOU the most joy?

eonflux · 15 July 2015, 05:08 AM

There's no rationale for any of this watch-related stuff.
"If it makes you happy, it can't be that bad"
Worst thing is to have watches that go unworn.

AP makes great watches, and you'll be really happy with the details, finishing, etc.
Looking forward to some pics of your new watch!

15 July 2015, 03:29 AM	#1
Skittman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Stu Location: England Watch: Yes Please Posts: 193	2 Rolex out, 1 AP in - Thoughts Hi all Thinking of down sizing my collection, currently consisting of SS Daytona, Ceramic Sub Date and YM blue dial. The trade would involve chopping in the sub and yacht for a new AP royal oak stainless chronograph. I'm just not getting the wear from 3 watches. Daytona would become the daily watch, reserving the AP for special occasions. Thoughts? __________________ Current - 116500LN Daytona White. 116505 Daytona Chocolate. 326934 Sky Dweller Blue Previously Owned - Yachtmaster I - Blue Dial. Sub C Date.116520 Daytona - White Dial. 116600 SD4K. 116515LN Chocolate. 116500LN Black Dial. 26320 AP ROC

15 July 2015, 03:41 AM	#4
GolfPunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Gary Location: UK Watch: WG Daytona Posts: 4,395	I agree with your choice, Daytona and ROO __________________ ♕ Rolex DateJust 1601 Buckley Birth Year 1972 ♕ Breitling Chronomat 47 mm GMT Limited

15 July 2015, 03:49 AM	#7
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,136	Yes! Sounds good to me. SS Daytona is one of the ones I'll never sell. The AP can be more of an end of week / weekender. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

15 July 2015, 03:50 AM	#8
johneh "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Real Name: John Location: Toronto Watch: 214270 Posts: 721	If you want to keep the Daytona, I second going for a non-chrono RO. I'm not a chrono guy myself so I'd keep the Sub and go with a 15400 (white dial). You'd have a few extra bucks in the bank account if you did that as well! __________________ instagram: jaschtag

15 July 2015, 03:53 AM	#11
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,672	You want the Royal Oak, ok, something's got to go. If it were me, the YM. As nice as it is, it loses just by process of elimination. You never discard a Sub, and you're a sucker for chronos. What dial on the Daytona? __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

15 July 2015, 03:30 AM	#2
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,195	why both chronos? id go daytona, RO jumbo

15 July 2015, 03:45 AM	#5
watchstudent "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: SW England Watch: Sub and a Speedy Posts: 368	Yep I would do that... well to be honest I would keep the Sub and ROC but your way would work!

15 July 2015, 03:49 AM	#6
OmegaJJH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Rolex & Omega Posts: 6,667	Think i'd keep the Sub.

15 July 2015, 03:50 AM	#9
fai9al "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Jeddah, KSA Posts: 413	Sounds like a good plan to me!

15 July 2015, 03:51 AM	#10
Urosfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: NYC Watch: Me now Posts: 19,250	I would do it

15 July 2015, 03:53 AM	#12
dabbotjordan "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Tom Location: Nice Watch: Rolex Posts: 752	Can't see you getting a straight trade,how much cash have you gotta to part with as well? Personally won't do it in a million years.

15 July 2015, 04:00 AM	#15
dabbotjordan "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Tom Location: Nice Watch: Rolex Posts: 752	At the end of the day,if you are happy with the trade and to top the balance up with cash,go for it! ( I would phone around and see what the trade in is on the RO just for reference,to get an idea of what sort of hit you might take if you ever wanna change again)

15 July 2015, 04:03 AM	#16
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,736	I don't like AP. I get that they are awesome watches, but I don't like the look. I would not do this trade. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

15 July 2015, 04:09 AM	#19
beer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Watch Dealer atm! Watch: all Posts: 2,800	Quality over quantity imo Not saying steel Rolexes arent quality but I would go for 2 $20k watches over 4 $10k watches especially if collection is not shared with wife or good friends etc and doesnt get wrist time

15 July 2015, 04:31 AM	#20
agsstructures 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 2,327	I would do it for a jumbo. This is me personally as the newer 26320 ROC is a tad large for my wrist. Also love the history of the Jumbo. Either way I like a little diversity so in your case, if the ROC fits do it!

15 July 2015, 04:34 AM	#22
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	I personally love the Daytona and will never trade mine. Totally get "sucker for a chrono" statement as most of my watches have been chronos. I think if I was in your shoe I would be content with Daytona and AP RO. I have the ROO and while I don't wear it all the time, it puts a smile on my face every time that I do... good luck with your trade...

15 July 2015, 04:36 AM	#23
00pumpkin "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dustin Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: GMT Master II Posts: 1,976	If you aren't really wearing the other two then I don't think its a bad idea. __________________ 16710, 116520, 216570, 116610LV

15 July 2015, 04:43 AM	#25
liuk3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,353	2 Rolex out, 1 AP in - Thoughts Just curious for you chrono lovers, what is it you love about them? Do you love the complication? Do you find yourself frequently using it from a practical standpoint, and if so for what purposes? No disrespect. I do respect and admire the chrono function, but whenever I am about to pull the trigger, I find myself hesitating since I just don't find a practical use for it in my everyday life. Maybe it doesn't matter so long as you appreciate the engineering of such a mechanical complication. To the OP, seems like you really love your chronos so I would say go with what you love! __________________ "Appreciate your life!"

15 July 2015, 04:52 AM	#29
KBM 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,421	OP, as per my post above, I would keep a diver and a chrono, for the sake of variety, but to answer the main question, I see no issue in trading 2 for 1, as long as the trade makes sense money-wise. Let go of all rationale and logical advice: which configuration of watches would bring YOU the most joy?

15 July 2015, 05:08 AM	#30
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,626	There's no rationale for any of this watch-related stuff. "If it makes you happy, it can't be that bad" Worst thing is to have watches that go unworn. AP makes great watches, and you'll be really happy with the details, finishing, etc. Looking forward to some pics of your new watch!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)