The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 January 2013, 08:06 AM   #121
craniotes
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Ad Rock
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by moby33 View Post
LOL. How anyone could read this review of the AP and still think, "Awesome, that's the watch for me!" is beyond me. When playgrounds start posing a threat to the well being of a "sport watch" I've just got to draw the line!

Entertaining post and unfortunately for the AP, I've got to say I pretty much agree w/ everything you said.
I've worn mine at the beach, in the ocean, in the pool, at the playground, gardening, hiking, farting around in the snow, during the kids' bath time, in the shower, etc and it has never missed a beat. Whats more, It still looks great and it still keeps time to +3 sec/day.





How's that for a review?

Regards,
Adam
craniotes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2013, 08:07 AM   #122
vman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
Watch Snob said it well:

Quote:
The Rolex Deepsea, despite coming from the premier manufacturer of sport watches in the world, is rather daft and more than a little preposterous. It is oversize, overspec’d and overpriced. To us purists, it’s an abomination, the tragic offspring of the best line of diving watches in the world. It never should have been made. Do yourself a favor and buy a secondhand Sea Dweller while you still can, as that is the last great Rolex diving watch.
Now, in general I am skeptical of "tool watches," as G-Shock is probably what I'd wear in extreme conditions. However, if I were you, I'd go with AP.
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2013, 11:47 AM   #123
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by vman View Post
Watch Snob said it well:



Now, in general I am skeptical of "tool watches," as G-Shock is probably what I'd wear in extreme conditions. However, if I were you, I'd go with AP.
Bringing up "Watch Snob" on any serious horology forum is pretty much like swearing in church. Such a clown.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2013, 02:51 PM   #124
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Just read my thread on Diver back from the Caymans or the Playa del Carmen one.
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1357534271.231991.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Watches are the new currency!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2013, 03:34 PM   #125
vman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Bringing up "Watch Snob" on any serious horology forum is pretty much like swearing in church. Such a clown.
Touché.

(It appears your feelings about Watch Snob are inline with my feelings about any discussions that involve functional bezels on luxury diving watches.)
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 01:13 AM   #126
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by ticketmaster123 View Post
I have worn my AP Diver as a daily for 2 months and my Sub hasn't been out once since.
Okay, good for you.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 01:14 AM   #127
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
I've worn mine at the beach, in the ocean, in the pool, at the playground, gardening, hiking, farting around in the snow, during the kids' bath time, in the shower, etc and it has never missed a beat. Whats more, It still looks great and it still keeps time to +3 sec/day.





How's that for a review?

Regards,
Adam
Okay, good for you.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 01:16 AM   #128
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
I've worn mine at the beach, in the ocean, in the pool, at the playground, gardening, hiking, farting around in the snow, during the kids' bath time, in the shower, etc and it has never missed a beat. Whats more, It still looks great and it still keeps time to +3 sec/day.

How's that for a review?

Regards,
Adam
But Adam, it cannot be true. That can't be done! ;-)

Enjoy your APs hard and often, buddy!
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 01:19 AM   #129
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Bringing up "Watch Snob" on any serious horology forum is pretty much like swearing in church. Such a clown.
X2. Using his logic, why would anyone EVER buy a vehicle other than a ho-hum Honda Civic to get to & from work.

I love when people say the DSSD is "over-engineered to a fault" because nobody would EVER use its depth rating. News flash guys...the same could be said about the Sub. Nobody NEEDs a watch to go past 200'...and 99.9% of us sport divers stay at 80' or less.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 02:24 AM   #130
AshAP
"TRF" Member
 
AshAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
bringing up "watch snob" on any serious horology forum is pretty much like swearing in church. Such a clown.
+1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AshAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 04:32 AM   #131
craniotes
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Ad Rock
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
But Adam, it cannot be true. That can't be done! ;-)

Enjoy your APs hard and often, buddy!
Will do, Patrick. What can I say? I buy watches to wear, not to admire from a distance and put away in the safe when I'm out living my life. Hell, even my Jumbo gets wet in the shower and pool on occasion.

Yup, the Diver's been an impressive companion these past couple of years, however if things go the way I think they are, it'll be falling on its sword to help fund a forged carbon Diver before long. Given how differently they wear, I can see room in the watch box for both, however there definitely isn't room in my budget for 2013. ;-)

Regards,
Adam

PS - I do hope to pick up another DSSD down the road as well, though that one's gonna have to wait its turn.
craniotes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 04:37 AM   #132
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
Will do, Patrick. What can I say? I buy watches to wear, not to admire from a distance and put away in the safe when I'm out living my life. Hell, even my Jumbo gets wet in the shower and pool on occasion.

Regards,
adam
Wait a sec... you shower?!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 05:02 AM   #133
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
Will do, Patrick. What can I say? I buy watches to wear, not to admire from a distance and put away in the safe when I'm out living my life. Hell, even my Jumbo gets wet in the shower and pool on occasion.

Yup, the Diver's been an impressive companion these past couple of years, however if things go the way I think they are, it'll be falling on its sword to help fund a forged carbon Diver before long. Given how differently they wear, I can see room in the watch box for both, however there definitely isn't room in my budget for 2013. ;-)

Regards,
Adam

PS - I do hope to pick up another DSSD down the road as well, though that one's gonna have to wait its turn.
I want the carbon as well but i just cannot see myself paying over $20k for that watch, so I guess that is not going to happen.

Adam, you are one of the biggest and happiest dive watch fans I know, a DSSD is unavoidable in your lineup (more so than a 15202, dare I say...)

Cheers mate!
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 05:26 AM   #134
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
I want the carbon as well but i just cannot see myself paying over $20k for that watch, so I guess that is not going to happen.

Adam, you are one of the biggest and happiest dive watch fans I know, a DSSD is unavoidable in your lineup (more so than a 15202, dare I say...)

Cheers mate!
Actually my favorite in his collection is his IWC Ingenieur 3227.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 05:35 AM   #135
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Actually my favorite in his collection is his IWC Ingenieur 3227.
I think the new 40mm is going to be very interesting to watch. A bit less weight, I think most of us hope.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 06:22 AM   #136
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
I think the new 40mm is going to be very interesting to watch. A bit less weight, I think most of us hope.
Maybe Richemond have been monitoring our conversations
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 06:46 AM   #137
craniotes
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Ad Rock
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Wait a sec... you shower?!
Like I said in my original post, "occasionally."

Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
I want the carbon as well but i just cannot see myself paying over $20k for that watch, so I guess that is not going to happen.

Adam, you are one of the biggest and happiest dive watch fans I know, a DSSD is unavoidable in your lineup (more so than a 15202, dare I say...)
AP's certainly not giving the FC Diver away, that's for sure, but I'm willing to pay the premium for the exotic nature of the piece and its relative rarity.

As for the DSSD, I loved it when I had it, but if I'm being honest here, I love the Jumbo I sold it to fund even more. Still, that doesn't mean that I won't own another one of these days...

Regards,
Adam

PS - The new 40mm Inge looks like a winner, though I do miss the intricately patterned "I" dial. Can't wait to see it in person.
craniotes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 06:54 AM   #138
vman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Bringing up "Watch Snob" on any serious horology forum is pretty much like swearing in church. Such a clown.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moby33 View Post
X2. Using his logic, why would anyone EVER buy a vehicle other than a ho-hum Honda Civic to get to & from work.

I love when people say the DSSD is "over-engineered to a fault" because nobody would EVER use its depth rating. News flash guys...the same could be said about the Sub. Nobody NEEDs a watch to go past 200'...and 99.9% of us sport divers stay at 80' or less.
Sir, you speak the truth. I would truly enjoy having a 911 as my daily driver even if I do not need all the power all the time.

But engineering has its limits. If you try hard enough you may end up with a creation whose specifications begin to overshadow the overall design and even common sense. Think of the soul-less McMansions that have sprawled around the States...

A Sub or a Sea Dweller are fine watches that one can wear for sports and leisure. Let's leave it at that, as I realize that my opinion is not necessarily shared by the other members of this forum.
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 06:58 AM   #139
v5cog
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Colin
Location: london
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 548
Wow guys, a lot of interesting and varied opinions here!
Even being an AP fan and owning a bumblebee... I must be honest here and that although I chopped in my DSSD for the bee, I would at a push choose the DSSD over the Diver, purely for its robustness and accuracy, as mine was the most accurate watch I'd ever owned, it never lost a single second in two weeks of solid wrist time, it only gained time when I put it on a winder, strange I know... I also agree its a pointless exercise by Rolex producing a watch capable of depths no human could ever endure, and yes it was bulky and top heavy, but once on the wrist it's bulk soon faded and its beauty and masculinity shines through along with its fantastic clasp, my two years with it left some nice memories and admiration from fellow watch enthusiasts, However, .... I have never felt such feeling as when i picked the AP, I smiled all the way home from the shop, and haven't stopped smiling since... If a watch can do that.... It gets my vote every time whether it scratches easily or not! Oh yes I forgot mines forge carbon with Ceramic bezel... Pretty darn scratch proof
v5cog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 08:27 AM   #140
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by v5cog View Post
However, .... I have never felt such feeling as when i picked the AP, I smiled all the way home from the shop, and haven't stopped smiling since... If a watch can do that.... It gets my vote every time whether it scratches easily or not! Oh yes I forgot mines forge carbon with Ceramic bezel... Pretty darn scratch proof
Love it! Very nicely said, Colin.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2013, 08:39 AM   #141
v5cog
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Colin
Location: london
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 548
mike
v5cog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2013, 05:02 PM   #142
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by v5cog View Post
...although I chopped in my DSSD...my two years with it left some nice memories and admiration from fellow watch enthusiasts, However, ....
You, me + a number of other members I've read about over the years all seemed to hit a wall on the DSSD around the 2 yr mark. Interesting...

I loved my DSSD and thought I would never part w/ it (it literally stayed on wrist for a little more than 2 yrs)...then I hit that wall & started looking for something different. While I can't say anything drove me away from it, after 2 yrs it just didn't bring the excitement like some of my other watches that I had owned for that long (or longer). Ultimately once I started wearing my SubC on a daily basis I knew the DSSD's days were numbered. It wasn't until I picked up my new POC9300 that I finally realized there was no more need for my DSSD.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2013, 03:42 PM   #143
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
curious, how much thicker is the dssd compared to the diver? aside from weight, whcih wears larger?
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2013, 07:58 PM   #144
diver2012
"TRF" Member
 
diver2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by ufboy73 View Post
curious, how much thicker is the dssd compared to the diver? aside from weight, whcih wears larger?
I believe the DSSD wears bigger.

To me it is an ugly thing - I would have a standard Sub over one even if they were the same price.

The Diver is in another league though...7 months on and I still love mine.
diver2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2013, 08:18 PM   #145
ufboy73
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by moby33 View Post
You, me + a number of other members I've read about over the years all seemed to hit a wall on the DSSD around the 2 yr mark. Interesting...

I loved my DSSD and thought I would never part w/ it (it literally stayed on wrist for a little more than 2 yrs)...then I hit that wall & started looking for something different. While I can't say anything drove me away from it, after 2 yrs it just didn't bring the excitement like some of my other watches that I had owned for that long (or longer). Ultimately once I started wearing my SubC on a daily basis I knew the DSSD's days were numbered. It wasn't until I picked up my new POC9300 that I finally realized there was no more need for my DSSD.
scary, when one is thinking of taking the leap with the dssd
ufboy73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 06:25 AM   #146
33JS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Scotland
Watch: SD 50th Ann
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by ufboy73 View Post
curious, how much thicker is the dssd compared to the diver? aside from weight, whcih wears larger?
When taking my DSSD for a service quote I wore the diver on bacelet one wrist and the DSSD on the other wrist. I couldn't believe how awkward my beloved DSSD felt in comparison to the Diver. The Diver was so, so much more comfortable.

The DSSD is gone now. The Diver remains.
33JS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 07:12 AM   #147
steveclocks
"TRF" Member
 
steveclocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalip View Post
Some of these perhaps?






That AP diver looks beautiful on the bracelet Dalip!!! Perfect mate
steveclocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 07:45 AM   #148
psv
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,063
Here is my main problem with the DSSD, having lived with one for a very long time: it is the only watch that I frequently remove from my wrist, be it for when sitting by the laptop, or in bed (I usually sleep with my watch on, much less so with the DSSD). It might be an amazing piece of engineering but I am realizing, albeit slowly obviously, that it is not really a good 24/7 daily watch. Now that might be relevant to some people, but other just wear their watches for a few hours here and there. For me, it is a problem, it is simply not a comfortable 24/7 watch on my wrist.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 08:12 AM   #149
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Here is my main problem with the DSSD, having lived with one for a very long time: it is the only watch that I frequently remove from my wrist, be it for when sitting by the laptop, or in bed (I usually sleep with my watch on, much less so with the DSSD). It might be an amazing piece of engineering but I am realizing, albeit slowly obviously, that it is not really a good 24/7 daily watch. Now that might be relevant to some people, but other just wear their watches for a few hours here and there. For me, it is a problem, it is simply not a comfortable 24/7 watch on my wrist.
I'm a 24/7 guy too and while I haven't wanted to rip it off my wrist yet, I have recently noticed it's weight. I was bed ridden last week for a few days and didn't wear a watch. When I finally put the DSSD on I could feel the weight and found it to be burdensome even. It may have been some oversensitivity since I was still a little sick but it has been a wake up call, now I'm afraid that my beloved Deepsea will start to mentally become heavier and possibly uncomfortable.

I'm not a flipper but want that "perfect" timeless watch that I could see me wearing when I'm sixty plus years old, In the back of my mind, the Deepsea doesn't seem to be that watch, but my GMTc is pretty awesome. Maybe I'm over thinking things.
So far my DSSD has been keeping my smile fresh when I look down and feels ok now that I'm healthy again, but the Diver is sure calling, especially the FC that I can't afford(unless I get rid of my DS and GMTc, the horror).
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2013, 09:10 AM   #150
jojosnr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
Don't you guys see that its weird for a whole ss watch to have two small black stud sticking out? Looks like a cartoon watch or a play watch to me. Sorry guys, just my opinion.
jojosnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.