Milgauss case back height vs. other sport models

[Overkill]

Hi all!

Is it true that the Milgauss case back is higher than that of the GMT-Master and Explorer II? It certainly seems that way to me.

I know that is the case for the dive models (esp. the SD) for the water residence – is it the Milgauss case back higher because of its antimagnetic features?

How do the watches all stack up in terms of case height? Anyone have technical facts or measurements? I'm really just curious!

Also, does anyone find that watches with higher case backs are more comfortable because they don't stick as much?

Cheers!

[Speed]

I wouldn’t say the Milgauss is more comfortable...but I do enjoy the heft.

[Nikrnic]

I have a Milgauss and an Air King and they do sit slightly higher due to the inner iron case that encompasses the movement but the slightly shorter and curved endlinks along with the bracelet make it very comfortable especially the bracelet on the Milgauss..

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[TudorTuesday]

Originally Posted by Nikrnic

I have a Milgauss and an Air King and they do sit slightly higher due to the inner iron case that encompasses the movement but the slightly shorter and curved endlinks along with the bracelet make it very comfortable especially the bracelet on the Milgauss..

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I thought the bracelets were the same, with the exception of PCLs and an applied vs embossed Coronet on the clasp. Do you have an older milgauss?

[Nikrnic]

Yes, you are correct, maybe it's in my head but the Milgauss just seems more comfy to me. I you get a chance try them on.

Originally Posted by TudorTuesday

I thought the bracelets were the same, with the exception of PCLs and an applied vs embossed Coronet on the clasp. Do you have an older milgauss?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Nikrnic]

BTW:; I just traded my older black non gv for a new Zblue yesterday and they both felt that same.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[TudorTuesday]

Originally Posted by Nikrnic

Yes, you are correct, maybe it's in my head but the Milgauss just seems more comfy to me. I you get a chance try them on.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I will for sure - I love the comfort of the Air King, but I can't match the bracelet on my 16570 for comfort. That's why I was wondering if you were comparing an older milgauss (with the thinner bracelet). Those old oyster bracelets just disappear on the wrist!

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

[Overkill]

Originally Posted by TudorTuesday

I will for sure - I love the comfort of the Air King, but I can't match the bracelet on my 16570 for comfort. That's why I was wondering if you were comparing an older milgauss (with the thinner bracelet). Those old oyster bracelets just disappear on the wrist!

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

I'm interested to know this too!

Does anyone have a case back height comparison photo of the Milgauss vs. a Sub/SD?

[Andad]

No pix but I can measure them if you want?

[Overkill]

Originally Posted by directioneng

No pix but I can measure them if you want?

That would be awesome! If you would be so kind, I'd be really interested in that. I wouldn't even know how to start doing it myself!

[Overkill]

Originally Posted by Nikrnic

I have a Milgauss and an Air King and they do sit slightly higher due to the inner iron case that encompasses the movement but the slightly shorter and curved endlinks along with the bracelet make it very comfortable especially the bracelet on the Milgauss..

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Any noticeable weight differences between the Milgauss and Air King? I wonder if anyone's weighed each watch separately (without the bracelet).

[Andad]

Originally Posted by Overkill

Any noticeable weight differences between the Milgauss and Air King? I wonder if anyone's weighed each watch separately (without the bracelet).

Now you are pushing it....

[Andad]

Originally Posted by Overkill

That would be awesome! If you would be so kind, I'd be really interested in that. I wouldn't even know how to start doing it myself!

Just about to cook dinner.

Won't be long.

[Overkill]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Now you are pushing it....

Hahaha, what can I say. I'm a nerd and numbers excite me.

Originally Posted by directioneng

Just about to cook dinner.

Won't be long.

Thank you, sir! Enjoy!

[RolexComplex]

Yes, the Milgauss is a thicker case. It’s 13.5mm thick.

Both the GMT-Master II and the Explorer II are 12mm.

[Andad]

Milgauss 116400GV. 13.15mm.
14060m K. 12.3mm.
16610. M. 12.7mm
114060 12.7mm.
16600. Z. 14.7mm.
GMT TTc. 12.5mm.
16613. M. 12.7mm.
16610LV. M. 12.7mm.
16710. M. Pepsi. 12.45mm. With Preik clear caseback.
Oyster Quartz TT '88. 12.65mm.
Daytona. 12.3mm

[Overkill]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Milgauss 116400GV. 13.15mm.
14060m K. 12.3mm.
16610. M. 12.7mm
114060 12.7mm.
16600. Z. 14.7mm.
GMT TTc. 12.5mm.
16613. M. 12.7mm.
16610LV. M. 12.7mm.
16710. M. Pepsi. 12.45mm. With Preik clear caseback.
Oyster Quartz TT '88. 12.65mm.
Daytona. 12.3mm

Wow, thank you so much for this! You're the man -- thank you for taking the time to measure them!

This is very interesting, and I'm surprised that the Subs are not that much thicker than the GMTs. Of the course the Daytona is just super sleek!

When I get a chance, I'll take off the bracelets of my Milgauss and GMT-Master, as well as a friend's Explorer II, and I'll try to take profile photos of the case back on a flat surface to get a feel for how much space is between the wrist and the outer edges of the case back on each watch.

I'm convinced the watches with higher case backs -- while they do not fit well under shirt cuffs -- do wear more comfortably!