ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 July 2018, 10:22 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Ken
Location: HK
Watch: AP SS Jumbo
Posts: 41
|
Flipping 202st for 5164a
Hi
I have been fortunate enough to own a 202st for a little more than a year. But due to its size it doesn’t get sufficient wrist time and I am thinking to flip it for a PP Aquanaut Travel Time. Would like to hear your advices. Thank you very much Ken |
7 July 2018, 10:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
i would think a 5712 is a better straight swap. I love my 64 and i probably wear it more than any other watch but depending on what you are going for it may or may not make sense as its way more casual with the rubber strap.
size wise the 64 and the 202 isnt massively different especially so because AP on a bracelet wears bigger than 39mm
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
7 July 2018, 11:32 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Ken
Location: HK
Watch: AP SS Jumbo
Posts: 41
|
Thanks Tyler. I also agree that 5712 will be the ultimate choice. The issue is that here in HK (guess everywhere else too), the chance of getting a 5712 is practically 0.
Currently I mostly wear the 26631st (41mm on bracelet) hence I think the 64 will make it a great pair for rotation |
20 July 2018, 08:25 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: England
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
Any ideas how hard these are to source? Am guessing from grey market prices that these are becoming a lot like hen's teeth. Also the 202ip I assume is trading way above list? |
|
20 July 2018, 09:38 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,066
|
I'd do it now, and then get on lists for the 12 as well.
|
20 July 2018, 11:21 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
I wouldn’t do it, the aquanaut is my least favourite Patek, I actually don’t like it at all and I can’t understand the love for it. Why swap a sought after AP that’s cool for an entry level Patek that isn’t?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
21 July 2018, 01:31 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1,609
|
Quote:
Agree with Ash. I had both the 67 and the 64 but just couldn’t bond with them. It’s really a matter of personal preference. For me 5711/12 > 15202 > 5167/64. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 July 2018, 06:16 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
|
Dont do that
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.