|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 November 2015, 01:24 PM
|
#61 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Tye
Location: Eastern US
Watch: Rolex Explorer ii
Posts: 1,464
|
 This Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
~NEVER GIVE UP! 2005 Explorer ii 16570T |
|
|
|
10 November 2015, 02:23 PM
|
#62 | |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 November 2015, 10:14 PM
|
#63 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Watch: SKX009, 16570 T<25
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 01:12 AM
|
#64 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Jerome
Location: Little RedDot
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 88
|
Exp II....
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 01:19 AM
|
#65 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,183
|
Explorer
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 01:58 AM
|
#66 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,035
|
Quote:
As far as winning some irrelevant prize... Not convinced that has any bearing on which watch is better? Collectively I would wager our fellow members combined experiences would be a more valuable gauge as to which watch is best suited to the individual.  The Pelagos is on the chunky side but the titanium compensates by keeping it light. The explorer hands are oddly shaped and to me were a bit awkward but to its credit as a truly fine watch it keeps its thickness down to a practical height. Either one could serve as a phenomenal daily wear, the Pelagos is nearly half the price and overall I think a more versatile and inspired choice... I Chose the explorer earlier in this thread before I had a Chance to know the Pelagos.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 01:59 AM
|
#67 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UTC -4
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 61
|
If I ever add another Rolex, it will be a white Explorer II...
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 03:53 AM
|
#68 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Shelly
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: 116520
Posts: 1,149
|
Completely different watches IMO, one is for the sea and one is for the land. Both are great watches, I do like the polar EXP II though, if I had to pick between the 2
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 04:24 AM
|
#69 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
Both great, love my polar though!OP have you purchased the watch already? This thread is a few months old, if you have post pictures....,
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 04:24 AM
|
#70 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
Explorer II...I have done everything with it.
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 04:45 AM
|
#71 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 690
|
Difficult choice but I would say ExpII
|
|
|
|
11 November 2015, 05:05 AM
|
#72 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
For deep water use if would be he Pelagos; for all else the ExpII.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
