ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 October 2017, 02:23 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: PH
Posts: 41
|
Thoughts on these Rolex and Tudor wathes
I have come across a seller of these two watches and would like to get any thoughts, comments or help with this potential purchase.
Not asking for valuation but help on whether the parts are original, replacements, fake etc. would be much appreciated. (Or anything special. ) Please note that both bracelets are either replacement or not original as the seller disclosed. He is a trusted friend, just wondering on everything but the bracelets. Cheers! watches* lol |
11 October 2017, 10:18 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Real nice Tudor 79090
|
12 October 2017, 02:20 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: PH
Posts: 41
|
|
12 October 2017, 02:21 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: PH
Posts: 41
|
And any thoughts on the rolex guys?
Any info would be much appreciated! |
12 October 2017, 09:13 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Well, it seems original. The bezel and dial have age. I guess it's a 1990 plus or minus 2 years. Cyclop polished down. Lil rust on the rehaut at 32 mins. Not a big deal. Crown looks rigHt. What does he want for the Tudor?
|
12 October 2017, 09:41 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,592
|
I have attached a picture below for comparison , mine is a 79090 from 89 . All looks pretty good to me , The cyclops might have a good polish as noted by Harry in previous post but the magnification can be easily distorted . Bezel insert & dial both look correct to me .
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.