ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 August 2017, 01:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3
|
GMT case sizes
Hello everyone,
I am also new to vintage Rolex, particularly the GMT. I am looking to purchase one and I am more so into the fit of the watch; so I am wondering about case thickness and bezel diameters in millimeters of the 1675, 16750, 16700 and the 16710. Unfortunately I have spent much time searching on-line, only to not find any definitive answers, especially on the older models. Some say the 1675 and 16750 have the same case, others say they do not. The 16700 is supposed to be smaller than the 16710, but I am unsure as to what that actually translates to in numbers. Also measurements between the newer models differ much between websites. If someone has these models and a pair of calipers to get the answers that would be amazing; photos comparing the sizes of the models beside each other would be great as well. Thank you in advance |
3 August 2017, 06:00 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
I can't say for certain as I never measured them. I can say this though.. 1675's are about 4.5mm thick. Early ones before 1.8m or so are sometimes called slim case where the shape of the normal crown guards is a bit different from later on. It is flatter on the top side where as the lager are more rounded. I don't know if the thickness is different and to be honest I don't think it is. If you are looking for the slimmest one to wear I think you should try them on instead of gathering data. Personally I would say that the 1675 on a rivet or folded bracelet sits very tight and flat to the wrist so that would be my suggestion if this is what you are after. Overall the models you list are very different so go and check them out to see which one you like the most. Many prefer the matte 16750 as it has a quickset movement and is a pretty modern watch with vintage features. Personally again I prefer the early cases with broad chamfers (and gilt dials) which I think look way better. Each to their own on this though.
Good luck! |
3 August 2017, 07:43 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
|
1675s are definitely not 4.5mm thick. They also aren't 14.5mm thick, so I don't think that was just leaving off a 1. I just took a digital caliper to my '68 1675 and it's 12.61mm, caseback to crystal, not including the cyclops. I figure there will be some variation, depending on exactly what crystal is installed, and how it is seated, along with case polishing variations, though I wouldn't expect the thickness of the case to change much with polishing. *shrug* The 1675 does sit very flat to the wrist, and wears much thinner than it actually is. I can usually wear my GMT under properly fitted shirt cuffs, so I find it highly appropriate for suit wear, unlike my pre-moon Speedy.
|
3 August 2017, 07:55 PM | #4 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
Quote:
I stand by my other comments though. Found this from a post here on TRF. Hopefully more accurate. Quote:
|
||
3 August 2017, 08:45 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
|
The rest of your comment is spot on, as far as I'm concerned.
|
4 August 2017, 02:10 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,171
|
You've got to try them on... the cases are all about the same as you can see and we've all got different wrists. The comment about the rivet and folded sitting lighter is true, and should be something you try out.
|
4 August 2017, 03:00 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,722
|
Hi
The link below may not give you everything you need to know, but if you are new to vintage GMT's this may help you with all the different model numbers and year of manufacture etc. Regards http://www.gmtmasterhistory.com/gmt-..._ref_1675.html |
4 August 2017, 03:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3
|
Hello,
Wow thanks everyone. I have read gmtmasterhistory many times, it is a great starting point. I was able to try on a friend's el cornino at one point and it fit amazingly well. Unfortunately there are not too many vintage dealers where I live to try these on. Does anyone have any info on case diameters of the 1675, 16750, 16700 and the 16710? Thanks |
4 August 2017, 04:25 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
Quote:
|
|
4 August 2017, 04:44 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
1675 for the win :)
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
4 August 2017, 05:06 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
|
|
4 August 2017, 05:07 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Lol. 6542 are unwearable.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
4 August 2017, 05:15 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
|
|
4 August 2017, 05:49 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
|
4 August 2017, 05:56 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
|
|
4 August 2017, 05:58 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Quote:
Bakelite just so damn delicate. Enjoy my friend!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
|
4 August 2017, 06:11 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
Thank you Thomas. 6542 rules..... :-))
Here my all day rocker....... ...and here we have something special. One of the very rare bakelites (1st series) with absolutely no cracks, damages. 100% flawless. I even wear it, of course carefully...... |
4 August 2017, 06:15 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
Sorry for off topic.....
|
4 August 2017, 06:23 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Don't think anyone will fault you for that with those lovely pictures!! That Bakelite bezel does look amazing and I agree it's something special but I really love the look of that super fat font aluminum on the 6542. It just looks great and is much more wearable I imagine. Thanks for posting.
|
5 August 2017, 12:59 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
Thank you
|
5 August 2017, 03:09 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,171
|
Quote:
And to be clear, pics like that are NEVER off topic! Thanks for sharing! |
|
5 August 2017, 03:35 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
Thank you Tom. It´s one of the early bakelites, probably 1st generation. Those had this colours, but they are very very rare. I never have seen before such one in flawless condition, with no damages.....
|
5 August 2017, 03:39 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Juergen
Location: Utah
Watch: GMT
Posts: 308
|
Hope a little bit more off topic is allowed.....:-))
I love this three-dimensional look. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.