The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 March 2016, 07:00 AM   #1
ref1655
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
New Rolex Model Line

hypothetical of course...with all of the newbies purchasing, sporting & collecting the current Rolex offerings, a potentially new market has been overlooked, one that combines history, vintage appeal & more ways to spend money.

how about a Rolex VR series? the VR would stand for 'vintage-reissue' & could include iconic models such as a Mil-Spec Submariner, rare Daytonas, the early Explorer II & maybe a few noteworthy bubblebacks.

some guitar manufacturers (i.e. Fender, CF Martin etc.) do this with great success. the original models would still maintain their vintage/collectible status & the re-issues would allow newer as well as older customers to savor & enjoy a taste of the past. while these factory re-issues would not come cheaply, they would still be less than the current asking price of an original.

just a thought as it seems many here cannot wait to buy their next Rolex.
ref1655 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 08:07 AM   #2
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Rolex has made a heritage line for Tudor but I doubt Rolex branded watches will follow.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 08:16 AM   #3
Timesurfer
"TRF" Member
 
Timesurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
Do you mean reisuing new watches exactly as they were issued back when? or a modern faux-vintage watch?

I agree with capote on this one.....

i don't think that will happen but its interesting to ponder on the possibility....
Timesurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 08:36 AM   #4
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 822
You mean like Panerai has been doing? Drove away many if not most diehard Ristis.
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 08:40 AM   #5
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by ref1655 View Post

just a thought as it seems many here cannot wait to buy their next Rolex.
Don't need any help, thanks!
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. BB58. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 12:30 PM   #6
ref1655
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timesurfer View Post
Do you mean reisuing new watches exactly as they were issued back when? or a modern faux-vintage watch?

I agree with capote on this one.....

i don't think that will happen but its interesting to ponder on the possibility....
as close as possible...with limited contemporary amenities such as a sapphire crystal & a 5 year warranty.

while I'm talking out of my rectum here...

1. the tooling/manufacturing capabilities of such an endeavor are probably still available/accessible to a certain extent.
2. a limited production run (say 250 per model worldwide) would offer a sense of exclusivity & 'investment' options for those so inclined.
3. accessibility to these models would be made available only by signing up for a worldwide lottery at an AD...guaranteeing those retailers additional foot traffic & potential add-on sales.
4. those selected would have 45 days to place a down-payment at any AD...failure to do so would transfer purchasing options to those on a runner-up list.

as far fetched as all of this sounds, it doesn't take a Wharton MBA to figure that even on a small scale, such a venture could prove to be profitable in addition to adding to a sense of exclusiveness & purchasing adventure on the part of the buyer.
ref1655 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 12:50 PM   #7
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
I'd like to see this too, but I don't think it will ever happen...
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 02:48 PM   #8
SamiKssiaa
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 292
Nah I quite like the thought of some rare Rolex watches being out there, re issues would hurt them IMO.
SamiKssiaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 03:26 PM   #9
WristEnvy
"TRF" Member
 
WristEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ray
Location: Berkeley, CA
Watch: IG @watch.kakashi
Posts: 2,579
Don't like the idea and hope it never happens.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
WristEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 03:51 PM   #10
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
This is a love/hate idea. On one hand to be able to get a hold of a vintage reissue Rolex would be amazing! On the other hand there really won't be anything "amazing" about rare vintage watches if Rolex was reissuing then at their discretion.

It just doesn't feel right.

For some reason it works well with my "heritage" Tudor Black Bay, but it has a lot to do with the price point.

The BB is probably my favorite dollar for dollar watch, but if it cost even $500-1000 more, I wouldn't be into it at all.

What do you think Rolex would charge for this first reissued run? The price point just doesn't work along with many other aspects of the notion.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 06:20 PM   #11
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
While I like your idea and way of thinking, I think Rolex could easily make similar amount of profits by simply issuing a Pt Sub-C, a gold DSSD, and a Pt GMTIIC. And it wouldn't need all that special new tooling either. And don't forget: Rolex is here to make money, not to please collectors. They aren't into limited production too, their goal is to make (and sell!) a s* load of watches of each model line.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2016, 07:36 PM   #12
mikeschmidt
"TRF" Member
 
mikeschmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 68
Personally I don't like "reissues". Instead brands should create new models that draw from the past. It should not have vintage or heritage in the name as it will be odd +40 years from now talking about a vintage vintage watch. Similarly a vintage reissue will have a fraction of the appeal compared to the original or a unique watch that drew inspiration from the original.

Disclosure: I own a Zenith Heritage Vintage 1965 and the name ruins the appeal of this watch which I realized only after the purchase.
mikeschmidt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.