The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2017, 01:14 AM   #1
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
5513 Dial - Insert question

So I have decided that I will pursue my first vintage Rolex 5513 and be patient until I find a better "for lack of a better term" example .
I run into this one on Ebay, I think the dial is original Serif but not sure of the insert? The seller said its original but not I am not sure.

To you expert out there I would appreciate your help. What you guys think. What do you also think of the watch? Is it price well, is this consider a good example?

Thank you for your kind help. Again



Here's the link.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Role...ZAh6d#rpdCntId




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 06:11 AM   #2
Sky21
"TRF" Member
 
Sky21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
Yes it is a serif dial, however the serial number is outside the range where serif dials are found. The hands are clearly replacements and the pearl is as well and I suspect the insert too. The case has been refinished according to the eBay listing and you can see some of the spring bar ends peeking out of the case indicating a lot of polishing.
For these watches I would highly recommend you purchase from a trusted seller or dealer and not eBay unless you are very knowledgeable about what to look for. There are so many put together examples or just flat out forgeries that you're most likely going to get burned on eBay.
Sky21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 07:25 AM   #3
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky21 View Post
Yes it is a serif dial, however the serial number is outside the range where serif dials are found.
I am in the process of selling my uncle's 5513 (6.0m serial) but has a serif dial although it's in the "maxi range". He's the original owner and has never had the dial replaced so it's hard because we these "truths" out there but as I did more research there are exceptions. And in the matter of 5513s in the maxi serial range w/ non-maxi dials, there are quite a few.

Of course, the watch in this thread could have had a dial replaced and the seller is not disclosing it...so I'm not saying the dial is original but without service history/records, it will be hard to definitively prove one way or another.

Here's a recent example from HQM too: https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...erif-dial-8078
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 07:47 AM   #4
Wing Zero
"TRF" Member
 
Wing Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: JC
Location: Earth
Watch: 1680 ~ 16610LV
Posts: 811
The insert is period correct as is the pearl. The tritium has fallen out of the pearl and just an empty shell.

Has luminova hands and 704 crown.
The pins sticking out could be the result of aftermarket spring bars.

It has been polished though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
************************

************************
Wing Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2017, 08:17 AM   #5
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wing Zero View Post
The insert is period correct as is the pearl. The tritium has fallen out of the pearl and just an empty shell.

Has luminova hands and 704 crown.
The pins sticking out could be the result of aftermarket spring bars.

It has been polished though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
X2, I would agree with these observations except that the spring bar pins are sticking out from the bottom spring bar holes due to the lugs being over-polished. The insert and pearl look correct. Watch wears later replacement hands.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 11:36 PM   #6
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
Thank you! Now i noticed that pin :)
MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 11:36 PM   #7
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
Thank you, Will take a look!
MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2017, 11:38 PM   #8
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
X2, I would agree with these observations except that the spring bar pins are sticking out from the bottom spring bar holes due to the lugs being over-polished. The insert and pearl look correct. Watch wears later replacement hands.
Thanks John, appreciate your kind reply.
MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.