ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

malcolm smith · 19 August 2017, 01:24 AM

Would you like to see a clear case back on the Sky Dweller?

ras47 · 19 August 2017, 01:34 AM

First, I'm not a fan of the overall design of the Sky Dweller. The features are amazing but I find the watch ugly.

Second, I despise clear case backs. Omega loves the display back and I just don't get it. Many add a couple millimeters to the thickness of the watch. And when you're wearing the watch you can't see it anyway! You have to take the watch off for the pleasure of watching the rotor spin around. WTF?? After you admire the movement's design and intricacies for 5 seconds, then what? I just feel it's a feature in search of a benefit.

WAK4 · 19 August 2017, 01:36 AM

I would

padi56 · 19 August 2017, 01:36 AM

No.

Oceanlover914 · 19 August 2017, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ras47

First, I'm not a fan of the overall design of the Sky Dweller. The features are amazing but I find the watch ugly.

Second, I despise clear case backs. Omega loves the display back and I just don't get it. Many add a couple millimeters to the thickness of the watch. And when you're wearing the watch you can't see it anyway! You have to take the watch off for the pleasure of watching the rotor spin around. WTF?? After you admire the movement's design and intricacies for 5 seconds, then what? I just feel it's a feature in search of a benefit.

This^

Psmith · 19 August 2017, 01:46 AM

Yes, I like to see the movement.

How about you, OP?

Likestheshiny · 19 August 2017, 01:50 AM

I would. If I bought a Sky Dweller, I'd stick a Custom Watch Concepts clear back on it (assuming Mr. Preik makes one). It's not an especially pretty movement, but it's certainly more interesting than a plain steel caseback.

RaceDoc11 · 19 August 2017, 01:52 AM

I like the watch but I don't like to see the back.

joli160 · 19 August 2017, 02:04 AM

Yes, i have one on my GMT and I enjoy looking at the engine from time to time

mailman · 19 August 2017, 02:06 AM

No. Not like it's an ALS where there's actually a beautiful hand finished movement to look at

Brainh18 · 19 August 2017, 02:10 AM

The internals are works of art. It would be nice if it was an option. I enjoy the beauty of the mechanics, and enjoy looking at them function. To each his own.

malcolm smith · 19 August 2017, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psmith

Yes, I like to see the movement.

How about you, OP?

I'm with you pal. I like to see the movement also.

PatronMTL · 19 August 2017, 02:16 AM

Was it just a question, or a teaser to a photo you're about to show us?

HogwldFLTR · 19 August 2017, 02:19 AM

I just don't think the movement is all that attractive.

malcolm smith · 19 August 2017, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatronMTL

Was it just a question, or a teaser to a photo you're about to show us?

just a question

mjclark32 · 19 August 2017, 02:21 AM

Sure

beshannon · 19 August 2017, 02:37 AM

No

Functionally it may be a brilliant movement but it is very plain looking

mementomori1983 · 19 August 2017, 02:43 AM

What function would it serve? Seems un-Rolex.

brandrea · 19 August 2017, 02:45 AM

Rolex aren't really known for their beautiful movements. It can stay unseen

sco · 19 August 2017, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ras47

First, I'm not a fan of the overall design of the Sky Dweller. The features are amazing but I find the watch ugly.

Second, I despise clear case backs. Omega loves the display back and I just don't get it. Many add a couple millimeters to the thickness of the watch. And when you're wearing the watch you can't see it anyway! You have to take the watch off for the pleasure of watching the rotor spin around. WTF?? After you admire the movement's design and intricacies for 5 seconds, then what? I just feel it's a feature in search of a benefit.

Watch forums are great, in that we can voice opinions. I totally disagree with just about everything you said. First, I think the Sky Dweller, is a really nice looking watch. The Fluted bezel, the sharp dials for legibility etc.

As for an exhibition case back, I think it would be a great idea on the Sky Dweller. My Omega Aqua Terra has one, and the movement is always available for me to take a look at. To me it shows craftsmanship with the way it is decorated. It shows the skill and knowledge needed to make these little marvels run so well. It seems like even some family and friends were intrigued by how a mechanical movement works after seeing it action.

If you just want to see a second hand move, and that be that, it is your prerogative. I enjoy all of my watches, and to me that includes checking out the "motor" as well.

ras47 · 19 August 2017, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sco

Watch forums are great, in that we can voice opinions. I totally disagree with just about everything you said. First, I think the Sky Dweller, is a really nice looking watch. The Fluted bezel, the sharp dials for legibility etc.

As for an exhibition case back, I think it would be a great idea on the Sky Dweller. My Omega Aqua Terra has one, and the movement is always available for me to take a look at. To me it shows craftsmanship with the way it is decorated. It shows the skill and knowledge needed to make these little marvels run so well. It seems like even some family and friends were intrigued by how a mechanical movement works after seeing it action.

If you just want to see a second hand move, and that be that, it is your prerogative. I enjoy all of my watches, and to me that includes checking out the "motor" as well.

I'm usually in the minority and my opinions tend toward the "stodgy." As I get older I get more crotchety. :) How long will it be until I start with the stories beginning with, "Ya know, back in my day..." You're right on the mark with the beauty of these forums. We can discuss, agree, disagree, and once in a while we can even change minds. I'm always happy to get a little edumacation on watches.

lhawli · 19 August 2017, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ras47

First, I'm not a fan of the overall design of the Sky Dweller. The features are amazing but I find the watch ugly.

Second, I despise clear case backs. Omega loves the display back and I just don't get it. Many add a couple millimeters to the thickness of the watch. And when you're wearing the watch you can't see it anyway! You have to take the watch off for the pleasure of watching the rotor spin around. WTF?? After you admire the movement's design and intricacies for 5 seconds, then what? I just feel it's a feature in search of a benefit.

This!

Unless of course it's A.Lange & Sohne. I'll wear it upside down lol

*google image*

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

sensui · 19 August 2017, 03:08 AM

As cool as clear casebacks are...I still prefer the simple Rolex non engraved caseback and have them as thin as possible. I never stare at the movement past the first two weeks on any clear caseback watch I own.

ras47 · 19 August 2017, 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhawli

This!

Unless of course it's A.Lange & Sohne. I'll wear it upside down lol

*google image*

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Okay, now THAT is impressive!! I wouldn't mind seeing that. Hell, I'd take the watch off my wrist often just to see that.

Richard Carver · 19 August 2017, 03:55 AM

Maybe it's my vintage roots but the movements are as interesting to me as the dial or any of the rest of it. I remove my watch at least twice a day to give my wrist a rub and invariable take a minute to watch that tiny miracle spin, tick and twirl. My little moment of Zen for the day.

I have them on every watch I could get one for and enjoy them immensely.

To the haters: DILLIGAF :)

Danex · 19 August 2017, 04:07 AM

Clear caseback for Rolex? Not for me. The rotor blocks so much and the movement is not really finished for display IMHO. There are some manual wind watches that I think are far more interesting with clear casebacks, such as the 1863 movement in the Omega Speedmaster Professional.

Cru Jones · 19 August 2017, 04:14 AM

No.

Would no longer be an "oyster".

henry333 · 19 August 2017, 04:36 AM

Almost like a car... some people will open the hood just to take a look... some don't know or care what's under.. lol
But Rolex movement are not really a show piece compare to others

sager · 19 August 2017, 07:22 AM

Nah. I like the simple caseback.

HogwldFLTR · 19 August 2017, 07:37 AM

Aside from the movement being plain, aftermarket parts would also void the five year warranty. That's a problem.

19 August 2017, 01:24 AM	#1
malcolm smith Banned Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: in this world Posts: 17	Would you like to see a clear case back on the Sky Dweller? Would you like to see a clear case back on the Sky Dweller?

19 August 2017, 01:34 AM	#2
ras47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Robert Location: Northern NJ Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 3,063	Would you like to see a clear case back on the Sky Dweller? First, I'm not a fan of the overall design of the Sky Dweller. The features are amazing but I find the watch ugly. Second, I despise clear case backs. Omega loves the display back and I just don't get it. Many add a couple millimeters to the thickness of the watch. And when you're wearing the watch you can't see it anyway! You have to take the watch off for the pleasure of watching the rotor spin around. WTF?? After you admire the movement's design and intricacies for 5 seconds, then what? I just feel it's a feature in search of a benefit. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono

19 August 2017, 01:36 AM	#4
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 52,266	No. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

19 August 2017, 01:46 AM	#6
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Yes, I like to see the movement. How about you, OP? __________________

19 August 2017, 02:04 AM	#9
joli160 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,355	Yes, i have one on my GMT and I enjoy looking at the engine from time to time __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

19 August 2017, 01:36 AM	#3
WAK4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Bill Location: NJ Watch: Always changing Posts: 4,170	I would

19 August 2017, 01:50 AM	#7
Likestheshiny "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: _ Posts: 1,877	I would. If I bought a Sky Dweller, I'd stick a Custom Watch Concepts clear back on it (assuming Mr. Preik makes one). It's not an especially pretty movement, but it's certainly more interesting than a plain steel caseback.

19 August 2017, 01:52 AM	#8
RaceDoc11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: USA Watch: GMTs Posts: 254	I like the watch but I don't like to see the back.

19 August 2017, 02:06 AM	#10
mailman TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,361	No. Not like it's an ALS where there's actually a beautiful hand finished movement to look at __________________ JJ

19 August 2017, 02:10 AM	#11
Brainh18 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Real Name: Brian Location: Colorado Watch: Rolex BLNR, Sub Posts: 277	The internals are works of art. It would be nice if it was an option. I enjoy the beauty of the mechanics, and enjoy looking at them function. To each his own.

19 August 2017, 02:16 AM	#13
PatronMTL "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: Montreal Posts: 432	Was it just a question, or a teaser to a photo you're about to show us?

19 August 2017, 02:19 AM	#14
HogwldFLTR 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: What's on my wrist Posts: 33,256	I just don't think the movement is all that attractive. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

19 August 2017, 02:21 AM	#16
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Sure __________________

19 August 2017, 02:37 AM	#17
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,895	No Functionally it may be a brilliant movement but it is very plain looking __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

19 August 2017, 02:43 AM	#18
mementomori1983 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 667	Would you like to see a clear case back on the Sky Dweller? What function would it serve? Seems un-Rolex.

19 August 2017, 02:45 AM	#19
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 73,697	Rolex aren't really known for their beautiful movements. It can stay unseen

19 August 2017, 03:08 AM	#23
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,356	As cool as clear casebacks are...I still prefer the simple Rolex non engraved caseback and have them as thin as possible. I never stare at the movement past the first two weeks on any clear caseback watch I own.

19 August 2017, 03:55 AM	#25
Richard Carver "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: US Posts: 2,237	Maybe it's my vintage roots but the movements are as interesting to me as the dial or any of the rest of it. I remove my watch at least twice a day to give my wrist a rub and invariable take a minute to watch that tiny miracle spin, tick and twirl. My little moment of Zen for the day. I have them on every watch I could get one for and enjoy them immensely. To the haters: DILLIGAF :)

19 August 2017, 04:07 AM	#26
Danex "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Dan O Location: Park City, UT Watch: Cosmograph Daytona Posts: 741	Clear caseback for Rolex? Not for me. The rotor blocks so much and the movement is not really finished for display IMHO. There are some manual wind watches that I think are far more interesting with clear casebacks, such as the 1863 movement in the Omega Speedmaster Professional. __________________ -Dan, WIS In Training 116520 Cosmograph Daytona 116622 & 16622 Yacht-Master 114060 & 14060 Submariner

19 August 2017, 04:14 AM	#27
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,499	No. Would no longer be an "oyster".

19 August 2017, 04:36 AM	#28
henry333 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Hendricks Location: USA Watch: 116600 Posts: 826	Almost like a car... some people will open the hood just to take a look... some don't know or care what's under.. lol But Rolex movement are not really a show piece compare to others

19 August 2017, 07:22 AM	#29
sager "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Sage Location: MENA Posts: 1,562	Nah. I like the simple caseback.

19 August 2017, 07:37 AM	#30
HogwldFLTR 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: What's on my wrist Posts: 33,256	Aside from the movement being plain, aftermarket parts would also void the five year warranty. That's a problem. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)