The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 March 2016, 08:44 PM   #1
RoyalDecapitation
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: 116520
Posts: 47
Your general perception of the offshore line?

Rolex Forums tells me I have been on a 4 year 2 month hiatus (!) but god knows how much longer it could have been had it not been for this gem of a purchase.

I've always been interested in AP as a brand and their legacy, and further research inevitably brought up the infamy of the Royal Oak Offshore as a celebrity watch, to be used as a mere party piece more than anything else. Personally the offshore line does have quite a number of over-the-top limited edition models, but the 'standard' 44mm designs (SS, CF, RG) seem to blend sportiness with elegance perfectly fine. I'd buy a 42mm but the arabic numerals on the chronographs just seemed too messy; the diver being an exception.

It sounds very much like a horological spin-off of the Bentley Continental's appeal with the rich and famous, but the Bentley ain't a bad car at all. Does the ROO deserve such stick, especially when compared with the other classic models in the range, as well as other luxury sports watches?

Otherwise you could give me a wake-up call and tell me this is just another case of post-purchase rationalisation
aproo.jpg
RoyalDecapitation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2016, 09:36 PM   #2
Islatate
"TRF" Member
 
Islatate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,078
Great choice. This Offshore reference is my favourite 44mm ROO! The combo of ivory tapisserie dial and ceramic bezel is unbeatable. I also have a preference for the index markers, thus the 42mm Jarno Trulli appeals to me the most (the 44mm ROO is too large for my wrist). Congratulations.
__________________
PP 5980/1R-001
PP 5146/1R-001
PP 5396/1G-001
AP 25940ok
Rolex 116520
Islatate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2016, 09:49 PM   #3
goog53
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,060
The ROO is IMO the best sport watch out there (Excluding RM due to price point. Maybe someday LOL))and some models can even be worn with a suit like the 44mm RG ROO. In America we are living in a more casual dress environment and this piece is perfect. My only complaint is the fact that the 42mm versions do not offer ceramic or cermet bezels and pushers (Trulli being the exception). That is a great watch you have there so enjoy and wear in good health my friend.
goog53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2016, 10:46 PM   #4
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by goog53 View Post
The ROO is IMO the best sport watch out there (Excluding RM due to price point. Maybe someday LOL))and some models can even be worn with a suit like the 44mm RG ROO. In America we are living in a more casual dress environment and this piece is perfect. My only complaint is the fact that the 42mm versions do not offer ceramic or cermet bezels and pushers (Trulli being the exception). That is a great watch you have there so enjoy and wear in good health my friend.
You have fc and ce divers also with ceramic bezels, i got the ceramic amd love that watch, the comfort is incredible for such a big watch, the 44's are also great I must say, congrats to the OP, great choice, for me they are the sport watches along with RM except RM are at a very different price point, having one of each would be the perfect sport duo IMO, the Trulli would be perfect if it had the crown and pushers of the 44's, but still quite a cool watch
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2016, 11:17 PM   #5
csi-n
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,042
I'd say that was a very nice purchase. It looks great, congrats!


Sam
csi-n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2016, 11:28 PM   #6
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,882
Great choice!
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 12:29 AM   #7
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
Congrats and looking good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 01:02 AM   #8
Tan
"TRF" Member
 
Tan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,258
ROO can seem grotesque to those with subtle tastes. I personally have nothing against it but I prefer the classic design of an RO and not the Offshore models.
Tan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 01:03 AM   #9
beer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
this is also something that put me off the ROO but at the end of the day I like it and that is why I purchased it
__________________
beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 01:05 AM   #10
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
I think they're great, particularly if you have a larger collection. I'd gravitate toward the RO line with fewer watches in the line-up.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 01:11 AM   #11
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
Great looking watch, but too big for my wrist! Congrats mate!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 01:30 AM   #12
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
I love the Offshore line, as they're a great fit for me and my lifestyle.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 02:00 AM   #13
Watchurself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
You have fc and ce divers also with ceramic bezels, i got the ceramic amd love that watch, the comfort is incredible for such a big watch, the 44's are also great I must say, congrats to the OP, great choice, for me they are the sport watches along with RM except RM are at a very different price point, having one of each would be the perfect sport duo IMO, the Trulli would be perfect if it had the crown and pushers of the 44's, but still quite a cool watch
I agree on the Trulli and really want to see one in person before a potential purchase. I like the 42mm ceramic options but I wish the dials had a bit more contrast. The Panda 44mm option is perfect, but the size can be a bit daunting for those of us with small wrists!
Watchurself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 02:20 AM   #14
RoyalDecapitation
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: 116520
Posts: 47
Thanks for the kind comments! The ivory-ceramic contrast was what sold me the most I think. Also for those commenting about small wrists, mine's around 6.25", so it does look slightly awkward but not overpowering at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tan View Post
ROO can seem grotesque to those with subtle tastes. I personally have nothing against it but I prefer the classic design of an RO and not the Offshore models.
That's what I would have liked to think as well, but I felt that the squares of the classic models were a bit too small, which made the dial look messy. The flat dial of the ROC Leo Messi was another consideration, but availability was always an issue. More prominent guilloché patterns on the ROO would have been great imo.
RoyalDecapitation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 03:22 AM   #15
Dolor Doc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 'merica
Watch: AP 15400
Posts: 151
Don't know much about the ROO, but aesthetically the watch looks amazing. As you said, slightly large for your wrist, but think that's half the point of that watch--it's made to be seen. Congrats. It's beautiful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dolor Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 03:28 AM   #16
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,029
The watch in your picture is my favorite ROO

Ginza is up there as well
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 03:32 AM   #17
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,615
To me, none of the current ceramic (bezel and/or buttons) 44mm or 42mm APs seem over the top or are too loud.
Well, perhaps the newest 42mm Diver chronos with bright green and orange may be a bit loud.
But overall, the ROOs are quite restrained. They are large, but not overly so when looking at IWC, Omega Planet Oceans, Breitlings, etc.

That SS 44 looks great!
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 03:46 AM   #18
BlueIn2Red
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 219
I don't like them at all, much too brash for my taste (you did ask!).
BlueIn2Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 05:08 AM   #19
Time Collector
"TRF" Member
 
Time Collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Anthony
Location: California
Watch: Rolex/AP/Panerai
Posts: 1,641
Personally , I think you made a great choice. I also thought that (in your words) "the 'standard' 44 mm designs (SS, CF, RG) seem to blend sportiness with elegance perfectly fine".
When it comes to other people taste in watches, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, if this 44 mm moves you that is all that matters.
So enjoy your watch, because there is no need for post-purchase rationalisation.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 44mm pool 3 .jpg (95.8 KB, 357 views)
__________________


"You can never buy back Time, so spend it wisely."
Time Collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 05:24 AM   #20
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by goog53 View Post
The ROO is IMO the best sport watch out there (Excluding RM due to price point. Maybe someday LOL))and some models can even be worn with a suit like the 44mm RG ROO. In America we are living in a more casual dress environment and this piece is perfect. My only complaint is the fact that the 42mm versions do not offer ceramic or cermet bezels and pushers (Trulli being the exception). That is a great watch you have there so enjoy and wear in good health my friend.
The new 42 ROOs do have CE pushers, maybe the bezel is only a year or 2 away.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 06:07 AM   #21
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
44mm ROO
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 06:26 AM   #22
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Love the 44. Great choice
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 07:19 AM   #23
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
The new 42 ROOs do have CE pushers, maybe the bezel is only a year or 2 away.
Don't think so, many people get the 44's because of the ce bezels, if the 42's had them I think it would partly kill the 44 sales which are quite more expensive, I can't imagine AP doing that on purpose except'for maybe a limited edition, if they did the 44 RG in 42 as well as other 44's many people would be all over them, especially people who think 44 is too big, clearly the 44 RG in 42 would'have a huge success, might be wrong but we will see, in any case AP should bring interesting things as the FC and ceramic pieces as I understood are disconued, the divers are of course and I understand the 44's will be as well, will be cool to see what they will be replaced by...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 07:49 AM   #24
Oboema Sesetokoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 615
I had a few offshores, incl the Trulli. The 42mm was still too big for me.

My focus is on the 15202 and the PP Nautilus now. I think those are better in balance.
Oboema Sesetokoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 10:58 AM   #25
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,270
I prefer the combo of ROO for AP and a Nautilus for Patek.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 09:14 PM   #26
aleeboy
"TRF" Member
 
aleeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
Yes, yes, yes!!!!!!!!!!
aleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 11:30 PM   #27
thecentennial
"TRF" Member
 
thecentennial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: UAE
Watch: PAM312M
Posts: 67
Personally I prefer simple, clean watches. The ROO is to busy for me. Some chronos work i.e. the Speedmaster but for a RO, has to be a plain old RO. My 2 penneth as requested.
thecentennial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2016, 11:37 PM   #28
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
I like it a lot but it is to big for my 6.5 wrist.
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2016, 07:22 AM   #29
Urooj
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 352
That is a gorgeous watch and such amazing wrist presence...
Urooj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2016, 10:04 AM   #30
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
Don't think so, many people get the 44's because of the ce bezels
Curious, how do you know this? Ive bought 2, and neither was because of the CE bezel... Maybe ppl buy them because they're just so bad a$$.

This would be a good poll.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.