ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 October 2019, 04:51 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
Something else bothered me is the date wheel. Whilst all other have open 6 and 9, the 26 is closed. Is this normal?
More pictures of the case and dates. Adjustments.JPG Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 October 2019, 12:13 AM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
|
|
6 October 2019, 01:13 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,792
|
|
6 October 2019, 01:24 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
I took the last couple of photos myself of the example using my iphone x. They’re of good resolutions but i dont know maybe it was automatically downsized by tapatalk. I’ll try to upload again using my laptop tonight. In person, the crown guards do look a bit off but the serial looked legit. The dealer can’t take out the 12 o’clock springbar as their technician was on holiday. So at this stage i havent seen the reference stamp, caseback and movement. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
6 October 2019, 04:15 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 104
|
I've compared it to my 1655 mk1 you are right on the crown guards, they are a big warning something is wrong here. the case is not original.
|
6 October 2019, 04:20 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 104
|
the caseback also looks a bit odd its too bold, the one on my mk1 1655 is more flat
|
6 October 2019, 04:26 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 104
|
Also the bracelet should be a 7836
|
6 October 2019, 07:43 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,591
|
I have one unpolished but it’s 6.7 mill so that’s 3 mill serial and I wouldn’t expect them to look the same
|
6 October 2019, 10:54 AM | #39 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
I know you’ve tried to make better pictures but they just aren’t good enough to say anything definitively from a distance.
It could be an assemblage piece with different parts having been replaced over the years. Unless you can find a local expert to help, you’re in uncharted territory. I don’t see any flagrant fakery, but limited by the images quality. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
6 October 2019, 12:35 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
The more I looked into the photos, I'm now almost certain that the case is not original. Hope the photos below are better in resolutions
|
6 October 2019, 01:16 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
|
6 October 2019, 01:18 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
|
6 October 2019, 01:21 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
|
6 October 2019, 01:26 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
hope these batches of photos are ok. sorry to waste your time guys with the bad resolution photos previously.
FYI price has dropped significantly. it's now below 25k from previously 27k asking. What's your take on this offering? If it's a bad-polished case / crown guards, do you think it's a catch considering all the complete paperwork, relatively nice mk 1 dial and correct hands? |
6 October 2019, 01:37 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Greg
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Tudor Big Block
Posts: 527
|
Why do you people keep perpetrating the fraud that this is a Steve McQueen watch
Shame on you |
6 October 2019, 06:21 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 104
|
Font of the engravings look off to me, shape of the case, especially the crown guards are off. also the caseback is not original, you can see its too thick.
Ive attached a picture of my mk1 so you can compare. I conclude the case is not original, so the paperwork doesn't mean anything. Also impossible the engraving looks this fresh for a watch that is 45 years old. |
6 October 2019, 07:02 PM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
Thanks a lot shiftf7. Yours is a direct comparison. Indeed the engravings looked off compared to yours. The top slopes of the crown guards are also at the wrong degree compared to yours. Wow this rolex vintage collecting does bring lots of risks. I was that close to pull the trigger on this example. Thanks to everyone who contributed and I'm glad there are good people with sharp eyes at TRF. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 October 2019, 06:21 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Posts: 73
|
Did you verify the SN and Ref # between the lugs? Also, the bracelet looks like it has a few links removed, are they available?
|
10 October 2019, 11:30 AM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
They failed to remove the 12 o'clock bracelet as it's stuck so the reference number was not visible. Extra Links are not available Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
10 October 2019, 05:40 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
|
|
10 October 2019, 09:33 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
|
11 October 2019, 12:42 AM | #52 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,792
|
Serial number engraving does look a little too perfect and deep on this case, although the photo/angle/lighting ain't great. Have you seen the movement?
These early-mid '70s Rolexes have engravings that are sometimes a little crooked or slightly askew, like the other example posted above by shift7. You never want to see laser precision on these. |
11 October 2019, 02:29 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
Hahaha good point swish. However comparing to shiftf7's crown guards', this example is definitely off Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
13 October 2019, 01:54 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 1655+216570
Posts: 497
|
Here are some pictures of my dad‘s watch.
Unpolished etc. glass was replaced when it was serviced a few years ago. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro |
13 October 2019, 10:00 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 423
|
|
13 October 2019, 05:30 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 1655+216570
Posts: 497
|
Explorer II Steve McQueen 1655 reading
Thank my dad for that.
It came out only for special occasions. He wore his 1973 EXP I most of the time. Took it out of the safe to wear it because that is what it was made for. An Exp I or Speedmaster have been on my list for a long time, but I would be very very cautious when buying used or vintage. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk Pro |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.