ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

igwt · 12 May 2013, 11:05 AM

hi,

would like to know how would you rate this watch... so i have a gauge if im overrating or underrating it....

thanks for your time..

in this pic i encircled the scratch... its not deep.. watch was never been polished.. (just a side note)

Im not selling this... just want to know the rating... TIA

SLS · 12 May 2013, 11:36 AM

Looks like it has had a recent polish, but looks pretty darn good IMO. Not LNIB, but very good condition. Is that a ding on the left lug at 6:00? Maybe a scratch on the left lug at 11:00, aside from that I can not see anything else. Hard to tell with the pics provided.
Scott

MP5 · 12 May 2013, 11:40 AM

agree with sls

igwt · 12 May 2013, 11:47 AM

Thanks for the comment.. Looks like it had been polish but really it has hairlike scratches...

Will take pics again and use flash to captute them...

Thanks for your time again sir

George Ab · 12 May 2013, 11:58 AM

Timezone guidelines provide objective criteria for rating.

http://www.timezone.com/2002/11/16/s...tions/#GRADING

springer · 12 May 2013, 12:10 PM

The watch appears in excellent condition for a pre-owned Rolex. Not many buyers are looking for scratched-up, late model Rolexes so having a mild polish is acceptable and normal. You will have many scratches on the watch in time if you are planning on wearing it.

If it is priced right, I don't see any issues. (As far as dings on the bezel or lugs, I didn't notice any in the pics you posted.)

Vincent65 · 12 May 2013, 11:18 PM

9/10

Tools · 13 May 2013, 12:22 AM

TRF doesn't have any "standards"...

kilyung · 13 May 2013, 12:29 AM

I'd call it excellent condition if I were selling it

GermanyMatt · 13 May 2013, 12:35 AM

Looks very lightly worn for its age. Are those scratches on the bezel? At least it can be replaced with NOS if the buyer wants it closer to 'like new' in condition.

drjfc62 · 13 May 2013, 12:36 AM

It looks pretty good to me, though I'm no expert.

SWISSAHOLICS · 13 May 2013, 02:28 AM

Excellent condition

mmmmp · 13 May 2013, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

TRF doesn't have any "standards"...

Not if they let me be a member. (LOL)

Mickyfin · 13 May 2013, 02:50 AM

Can you get some photos with the 10 to 2 handset please?

Nycturbovr6 · 13 May 2013, 08:43 AM

Looks pretty good to me

U5512 · 13 May 2013, 09:35 AM

I agreed with "Excellent condition" suggestions. It is not MINT so please don't use "mint" when describing your watch for sale because with a loupe you will find lots of things associated with an already worn watch although it might look good to the naked eyes.

kngzfrd · 13 May 2013, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George Ab

Timezone guidelines provide objective criteria for rating.

http://www.timezone.com/2002/11/16/s...tions/#GRADING

Good reference material... Glad I stumbled upon this thread...thanks

Grey.Coupe · 13 May 2013, 09:51 AM

Rating?

8.9, 9.2, 9.4, 9.0, 9.0, with the judge from Alabang abstaining.

HL65 · 13 May 2013, 10:16 AM

Watch looks to be in great condition! As for TRF standards that is a different story.

cop414 · 13 May 2013, 10:21 AM

I would say very good to excellent. As posted above not like new.

Rags · 13 May 2013, 10:24 AM

I'd give it 8 out of 10 if that helps.

12 May 2013, 11:05 AM	#1
igwt "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: alabang Posts: 211	Kindly rate this watch in TRF standards.. (pics inside) hi, would like to know how would you rate this watch... so i have a gauge if im overrating or underrating it.... thanks for your time.. in this pic i encircled the scratch... its not deep.. watch was never been polished.. (just a side note) Im not selling this... just want to know the rating... TIA

12 May 2013, 11:36 AM	#2
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,399	Looks like it has had a recent polish, but looks pretty darn good IMO. Not LNIB, but very good condition. Is that a ding on the left lug at 6:00? Maybe a scratch on the left lug at 11:00, aside from that I can not see anything else. Hard to tell with the pics provided. Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

12 May 2013, 11:58 AM	#5
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	Timezone guidelines provide objective criteria for rating. http://www.timezone.com/2002/11/16/s...tions/#GRADING __________________

12 May 2013, 12:10 PM	#6
springer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,194	The watch appears in excellent condition for a pre-owned Rolex. Not many buyers are looking for scratched-up, late model Rolexes so having a mild polish is acceptable and normal. You will have many scratches on the watch in time if you are planning on wearing it. If it is priced right, I don't see any issues. (As far as dings on the bezel or lugs, I didn't notice any in the pics you posted.) __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

13 May 2013, 12:22 AM	#8
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,039	TRF doesn't have any "standards"... __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

12 May 2013, 11:40 AM	#3
MP5 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: ATX Posts: 2,881	agree with sls

12 May 2013, 11:47 AM	#4
igwt "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: alabang Posts: 211	Thanks for the comment.. Looks like it had been polish but really it has hairlike scratches... Will take pics again and use flash to captute them... Thanks for your time again sir

12 May 2013, 11:18 PM	#7
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,293	9/10

13 May 2013, 12:29 AM	#9
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,870	I'd call it excellent condition if I were selling it

13 May 2013, 12:35 AM	#10
GermanyMatt "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Matt Location: Northern VA Watch: 126711, 126610 Posts: 1,803	Looks very lightly worn for its age. Are those scratches on the bezel? At least it can be replaced with NOS if the buyer wants it closer to 'like new' in condition.

13 May 2013, 12:36 AM	#11
drjfc62 Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Raleigh, NC Watch: DSSD, TT sub Posts: 532	It looks pretty good to me, though I'm no expert.

13 May 2013, 02:28 AM	#12
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	Excellent condition __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

13 May 2013, 02:50 AM	#14
Mickyfin "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Michael Location: Suomi Watch: Planet Ocean Posts: 334	Can you get some photos with the 10 to 2 handset please?

13 May 2013, 08:43 AM	#15
Nycturbovr6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York Posts: 7,630	Looks pretty good to me

13 May 2013, 09:51 AM	#18
Grey.Coupe "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NC, USA Posts: 555	Rating? 8.9, 9.2, 9.4, 9.0, 9.0, with the judge from Alabang abstaining.

13 May 2013, 10:16 AM	#19
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,389	Watch looks to be in great condition! As for TRF standards that is a different story. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

13 May 2013, 10:21 AM	#20
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 71,824	I would say very good to excellent. As posted above not like new. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

13 May 2013, 10:24 AM	#21
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,183	I'd give it 8 out of 10 if that helps. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)