The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 12 December 2014, 12:28 PM   #31
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: 5514
Posts: 1,630
Totally normal for 60s lume to glow... even brightly, after intense light exposure. However, they fade quickly. Only in the event that they don't quickly fade would I be concerned about originality.
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2014, 12:36 PM   #32
cajuntiger
"TRF" Member
 
cajuntiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I have a few GMTs from the late 1960s, beginning with serial number 17XXXXX, case back 1967. When I charge the 1967 GMT with a light, the dial and hands glow for a brief period of time. When I charge the other GMTs (dating from 1968 to 1972) with a light, they do not glow at all.


II.67 caseback sn 1600XXX glows

(1968) sn 19XXXXX 5513 and sn 19XXXXX 1675 do not glow
cajuntiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2014, 07:49 PM   #33
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
Totally normal for 60s lume to glow... even brightly, after intense light exposure. However, they fade quickly. Only in the event that they don't quickly fade would I be concerned about originality.
Hi Greg, what length of time would start to be concerned of originality?
Would too long a period cast doubts of a possible relume?
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2014, 12:43 AM   #34
g-boac
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I have a few GMTs from the late 1960s, beginning with serial number 17XXXXX, case back 1967. When I charge the 1967 GMT with a light, the dial and hands glow for a brief period of time. When I charge the other GMTs (dating from 1968 to 1972) with a light, they do not glow at all.
This behavior is consistent with what's been observed with Omega Speedmasters of that era, including a 1966 and 1967 model that I have, which were final assembled and sold in 1967 and 1968, respectively. Starting with 145.022-69 Speedmasters final assembled in 1969 and 1970-onward, you'll find aged tritium that WON'T glow.

This gets interesting because this would perhaps point to a common radioluminescent paint supplier, even perhaps a common batch of the radioluminescent paint, that were used by multiple Swiss watch manufacturers, their dial suppliers, or subcontractors to their dial (and hand) suppliers.

So this raises an additional question, that's also interesting: did the dial manufacturers also lume the dials, or were dials lumed directly by the watch manufacturers? Or. . .since the lume on dials and hands match, did Rolex (and the other watch manufacturers) move parts between several different subcontractors - for example, Company A (e.g., Singer or Beyer) made dials, Company B (??) made hands, Company C made the lume, and Company D (or possibly Rolex itself) applied the lume to both Company A's hands and Company B's dials??
g-boac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2014, 12:59 AM   #35
mmancari
"TRF" Member
 
mmancari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: MichaelMancari
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex
Posts: 119
Interesting question. About the only one who could answer that is someone with first hand knowledge. Someone who was either employed during the 60s and 70s. There are very few manufacturers that are completely in house. For example: Today Vacheron Constantini uses FP Journe to manufacture their dials.

My guess, is that the industry must have supplied each other with parts and paint. No one manufacture had exclusivity. It's just economics.
mmancari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 December 2014, 02:53 AM   #36
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
My 63 White Swiss 5513 and 66 Simpson 5513 glow brightly but briefly if exposed to bright light.
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2014, 09:38 AM   #37
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: 5514
Posts: 1,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Walrus View Post
Hi Greg, what length of time would start to be concerned of originality?

Would too long a period cast doubts of a possible relume?

Hey bud. Sorry for my delayed reply. I've seen many original 1960s tritium lume glow bright at first immediately after exposure. If you watch it in the dark you can literally see it fade and between 30-60 seconds it should be almost all gone. Sometimes a very faint glow can be seen throughout the night but the important thing is that it should fade quickly and then evens off. Next time I have my 68 Tudor in front of me I'll try to time it to see how long it takes.
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 December 2014, 10:03 AM   #38
linesiders
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
Hey bud. Sorry for my delayed reply. I've seen many original 1960s tritium lume glow bright at first immediately after exposure. If you watch it in the dark you can literally see it fade and between 30-60 seconds it should be almost all gone. Sometimes a very faint glow can be seen throughout the night but the important thing is that it should fade quickly and then evens off. Next time I have my 68 Tudor in front of me I'll try to time it to see how long it takes.
This is what I experience with my 68 Tudor and Omega
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2014, 02:51 PM   #39
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
Hey bud. Sorry for my delayed reply. I've seen many original 1960s tritium lume glow bright at first immediately after exposure. If you watch it in the dark you can literally see it fade and between 30-60 seconds it should be almost all gone. Sometimes a very faint glow can be seen throughout the night but the important thing is that it should fade quickly and then evens off. Next time I have my 68 Tudor in front of me I'll try to time it to see how long it takes.
Hi Greg
That was a concern of mine after reading through the thread that it only glows for a short period of time and mine was visible (only ever so faintly) throughout the night.
Thanks for clearing that up.
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2014, 03:06 PM   #40
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
I've owned over a dozen watches from this late 1mil serial range/era (many of which have been 5512's and 5513's), and a vast majority of them still glowed somewhat strongly. It is perfectly normal, and not necessarily an indicator that they have been relumed.
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2014, 07:49 AM   #41
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: 5514
Posts: 1,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Walrus View Post
Hi Greg

That was a concern of mine after reading through the thread that it only glows for a short period of time and mine was visible (only ever so faintly) throughout the night.

Thanks for clearing that up.

That sounds ok!
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2018, 02:27 PM   #42
Throttle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Smellody View Post
My 5513 and 1675 of the same era also glow and have a beautiful green patina when not in the dark. One of my favorite features of early matte dials.

And so do my 1967 Sub5513 and GMT1675.

1967 must be a special year?

Wahaha
Throttle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2018, 04:45 PM   #43
CPRWATCH
"TRF" Member
 
CPRWATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Throttle View Post
And so do my 1967 Sub5513 and GMT1675.

1967 must be a special year?

Wahaha
Holy thread resurrection batman after 4 years ,but to be fair this gets a glowing review from me
CPRWATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2018, 05:48 PM   #44
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
I’d be more worried if it didn’t glow.

Edit: Nice bump..
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2018, 01:18 PM   #45
donsidhu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Donald
Location: Toronto
Watch: Red Sub
Posts: 592
I have a 5513 serial 1,596,xxx produced 2nd quarter of 1967, that has similar lume charactertics as those described in this threat. When I put my UV flashlight to it the lume glows brightly but dies out in one or two minutes.



donsidhu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2018, 05:21 AM   #46
JerimiahLee
"TRF" Member
 
JerimiahLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jerimiah
Location: NYC
Watch: 5513 Meters 1st
Posts: 669
Completely normal for early GMT and Subs
JerimiahLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2018, 05:46 AM   #47
mrj115
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by esspee1200 View Post
Correct for these era dials. Mines glows as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is the era 66 & 67 or should we expect this for a longer time period?
mrj115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2018, 02:12 PM   #48
esspee1200
"TRF" Member
 
esspee1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrj115 View Post
Is the era 66 & 67 or should we expect this for a longer time period?
era i have seen is 66-67. although, i believe this may continue for MF dials up until 69.
esspee1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2018, 08:31 PM   #49
spoilsofwar01
"TRF" Member
 
spoilsofwar01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,437
Looking Boss!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmancari View Post
In the dark
Very Tidy, Well played
__________________
"H"
5513 Submariner 1968
114270 Explorer 2005
Smiths W10 1968
Tissot Seastar 2011
spoilsofwar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2019, 01:48 PM   #50
Dre80
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 1
My 1680 red sub glows all night. I think the original owner had luminova put on. Looks like original tritum but i enjoy waking up at 4am reading the time clearly.
Dre80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2019, 03:29 AM   #51
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
I also have a zinc sulfide 5513 from 1967 that glows ! My 16700 from 93 doesn't glow btw!
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.