ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 February 2016, 08:15 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,816
|
1675 insert
Just wondering if this insert is period correct for the '70s (4.2m s/n) or is it more recent and "aged"? Thanks
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
14 February 2016, 08:31 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,816
|
rear side
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
14 February 2016, 09:12 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,593
|
That is fine.. Red backs are good during that period..
|
14 February 2016, 09:43 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,816
|
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
14 February 2016, 09:54 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Not the best of pics focus wise but seems naturally faded to me.. Better shot would help..
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.