ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 February 2016, 10:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
Difficult appraisal
I am interested in finding a vintage Rolex expert to give me an appraisal for a difficult to assess watch. (1930-1947 Chronographe) I have found several names, but it would be helpful if anyone who has experience with, or knows of, a "guru" would pass along a name. (I posted a picture and asked for help finding someone in another post, but it got off track)
Your help is much appreciated. |
15 February 2016, 10:12 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
|
Here's a link to that thread: www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=458438
|
15 February 2016, 11:07 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
I think you are going to have a hard time getting someone to put a value number on this. The case is not Rolex, parts of the movement are not Rolex, hands have been modified, and dial has been cleaned.
Are you even sure that the movement started out as a movement in a Rolex watch? Do you have providence to prove it? Movements of this time were made by a third party and were used in several watch brands.. How are you sure that this is not another watch brand with ether a Rolex dial added or even simply repainted with the words Rolex on the dial.. These are all things that someone is appraising the watch will want to ask you.. Not trying to be hard on you but Vintage Rolex is a scary scary place if things are not 100% correct.. |
15 February 2016, 11:25 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
I'm not sure of anything, except what the person who worked on the watch told me, which is why I need help, EVEN if the news is bad.
I didn't have the dial cleaned, he only removed a few particles that could potentially cause problems with the function of the watch. The dial is authentic Rolex and the movement is one used by Rolex in their Chronographes during the time period of 1930-1947. The hands were completely free of luminous material when I purchased the watch, so that was added. I know the watch isn't original or 100% correct. I just need help finding out what it is, hence my quest to find an "expert's" expert, so to speak. |
15 February 2016, 04:12 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,825
|
There are plenty of counterfeit "Rolex" chronographes floating around. They all started out as a different brand, then got a few counterfeit parts added to the movements and a repainted dial. This means that anything that is not 100% Rolex throughout will be seen as highly suspicious.
|
15 February 2016, 11:49 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Out of curiosity, do you want to appraise it for insurance purposes, or do you want to try to return it to the seller. It's a nice watch and you seem aware that it's not a super valuable example. I would enjoy wearing it. I would not enjoy a mint $60k chrono. I just wanted to express this.
|
16 February 2016, 02:26 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Knowing the value would be interesting, but I mainly want an expert I can show the watch to and get some answers. I like the watch, and have worn it. I don't like the strap, but that's an easy fix. |
|
16 February 2016, 02:29 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
|
16 February 2016, 06:24 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
The movement should be a very valuable part. But housed in a case that is aftermarket would make most buyers shy away from it. I am just saying this to help as I have seen this before in the car business. If the dial is good and orig then this may be what the watch is worth in totality.
|
16 February 2016, 06:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
Thanks Harry. Good information, and advice. That's why I need to have someone who is very knowledgeable look at it closely to see what the different components are.
|
16 February 2016, 09:14 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
I would think that there is more knowledge on this site than you will find with almost any "Expert" that you can send the watch to.. One idea might be to get detailed photos of the watch with closeups of the dial and movement and post them here.. I'm sure you will get many details on what it is you have there from that.. The higher the quality of the dial and movement photos the better..
I do think however that the most anyone will be able to tell you is stuff you already know.. You know the movement type.. Unless there is a maker marked on the inside of the case back, I would doubt you will get much detail on the case.. The dial is the interesting one.. Is it real or a repaint.. That is something you might be able to tell from some high quality closeup pics.. I'm betting however from experience that the entire watch is non Rolex with a repainted dial to look like a one... But I do hope I'm wrong.. |
16 February 2016, 10:07 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
There is a Rolex maker mark on the inside of the case back, but it's unlikely it goes with the case. There is some question as to whether or not it's a Rolex case, but I didn't think Rolex made a plated case (not stainless). I don't think there's any doubt that it's the wrong case for the watch. I can't take the back off myself, but I'll try to get some help with that. If the dial isn't real, then I got more than scammed by the guy I bought it from, I got taken by the watchmaker as well. I never would have paid as much as I did to have it restored if I thought it was fake. I probably wouldn't be the first person to be taken that way, but it's difficult to believe that a reputable watchmaker would do something like that. I'll definitely look into it... Thanks again for your input. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.