The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 April 2020, 09:33 AM   #1
Leoswag
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Rolexman
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2
Explorer I 214270 is too big?

Hi guys.
I received a 2015 Rolex Explorer I 214270 which a relative of mine had sitting in a safe for 5 years.
I really like the watch so far, it’s also my very first rolex.

Im used to wearing small dress watches such as vintage Piaget Altipianos and my eyes are really not used to sportwatches in steel.

In the last two days i’ve been bugged cause I see the 39mm case as MASSIVE!
So i was looking around and I’m now considering whether trading it for a 36mm Explorer I from local jewelry.

I attach photos of me wearing the watch. You think it fits oddly? Would a 36mm case fit better my wrist size (7inch smth)
Thank you guys
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 080C2A42-1670-4907-873E-9E821A6EBA48.jpeg (56.2 KB, 829 views)
File Type: jpeg 2449388A-CEA7-4F81-899E-FFF2FE067F55.jpeg (47.0 KB, 815 views)
Leoswag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:35 AM   #2
alphasports
"TRF" Member
 
alphasports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Montreal CAN
Posts: 454
Looks perfectly fine. My wrist is 6.75" and no problem with mine. You're just used to small watches...give it a few days.
alphasports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:36 AM   #3
Commonproject
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
Looks fine to me, that's how a modern Rolex should fit. You'll get used to it and the 36 will start feeling small. But it's all personal preference.
Commonproject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:37 AM   #4
herts9
"TRF" Member
 
herts9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,021
I think it looks great. Stick with the 39mm
herts9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:38 AM   #5
WatchOut4It
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: CONUS
Posts: 722
Agree. I think it looks great. But nothing wrong with preferring a smaller watch. I’d try to give it a few weeks before passing judgement. See if it grows on you. I love the size of the 214270 on My 7.25” wrist.

WatchOut4It is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:41 AM   #6
carwashchris
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Vintage DD'S
Posts: 828
The 39 was too big for me. At least it felt that way. Chris
carwashchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:41 AM   #7
LigerBelair
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sea-Dweller 50th A
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphasports View Post
Looks perfectly fine. My wrist is 6.75" and no problem with mine. You're just used to small watches...give it a few days.
Well said.
LigerBelair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:42 AM   #8
911_3.6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Watch: SD43
Posts: 192
Nice looking watch and it fits great on you. Like others said, you will get used to it.

Wear it in good health and don’t look back.
911_3.6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:44 AM   #9
jatco
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
jatco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: YVR
Watch: 116233/79190
Posts: 47,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphasports View Post
Looks perfectly fine. My wrist is 6.75" and no problem with mine. You're just used to small watches...give it a few days.
I agree.
This isn't a 'smaller Dress watch'. Looks great.
Enjoy.
__________________
.

.
' A Crown for every achievement '
jatco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:45 AM   #10
winst
"TRF" Member
 
winst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 6,476
Think it looks great - I have a 6.75 wrist and am wearing a Tudor BB41 for now until I can afford the Explorer 39mm. Don’t change it for the 36mm - I think you will regret it and it is nice that it has come from within your family.
winst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:45 AM   #11
Recondope
"TRF" Member
 
Recondope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Aaron
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 601
Looks perfect to me. Enjoy it!
Recondope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 09:59 AM   #12
kits73
"TRF" Member
 
kits73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 97
Looks good on you. Keep it.
kits73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:03 AM   #13
TimelessQuality
"TRF" Member
 
TimelessQuality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 161
Explorer I 214270 is too big?

I will echo what others have said - you're just accustomed to smaller watches so it's perceived as big. It will not seem as big once you've gotten used it to.

It's not to say that you shouldn't trade for the 36mm, but I would recommend giving the 39mm a try for a while longer so you get a better feeling for it. If after that you're still interested, go try on the 36mm version.

I debated the 36 vs 39 Explorer, mainly because I have small wrists. I picked the 39 and couldn't be happier.
TimelessQuality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:23 AM   #14
Rexplorer214270
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: New England
Watch: BLRO;PP5230G
Posts: 544
Keep the 39 mm you will get accustomed to it. Congrats!
Rexplorer214270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:29 AM   #15
jrbar-on
2024 Pledge Member
 
jrbar-on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 784
It looks fine and I'm sure if you posted a photo of your older dress watch everyone would say it is too small. Despite this, you should wear what YOU like and what makes YOU comfortable regardless of what anyone here says.

Cheers,

Jonathan
jrbar-on is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:36 AM   #16
spangelsaregreat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Scotland
Watch: 5500 Explorer
Posts: 12
I would probably prefer a 39mm but actually have a 34mm 5500 Explorer.
spangelsaregreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:36 AM   #17
mgsooner
"TRF" Member
 
mgsooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,906
It’s funny, I never experienced this period of thinking my 214270 was too big. Prior to getting it I had worn a 36mm watch for a decade. Before settling on the Explorer I tried on a 36mm OP and it looked absolutely tiny to me (I have 6.75” wrist).

I see the modern Explorer as a sports watch with versatility, which is exactly what I was looking for. If you want something with a heavy lean toward the dressier side of things, it may not be right for you.
__________________
|Rolex Submariner 114060|Rolex Datejust 126234 silver dial|
|Tudor Heritage Chrono 70330B|
|Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz|
mgsooner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:41 AM   #18
Leoswag
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Real Name: Rolexman
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgsooner View Post
It’s funny, I never experienced this period of thinking my 214270 was too big. Prior to getting it I had worn a 36mm watch for a decade. Before settling on the Explorer I tried on a 36mm OP and it looked absolutely tiny to me (I have 6.75” wrist).

I see the modern Explorer as a sports watch with versatility, which is exactly what I was looking for. If you want something with a heavy lean toward the dressier side of things, it may not be right for you.
No way! Im happy to own a proper sport watch, not needing another dress watch style atm.
My whole bugging was about the size 39mm might have been not proportionate on me, but you guys have really helped me out. Thanks
I’ll give it a few weeks and see how I feel.
Leoswag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:49 AM   #19
thewheel82
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 104
Size looks good. I wear a 214270 as well on 6.75” wrist and really enjoy it.
thewheel82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:49 AM   #20
alweisenberger
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 164
I wish I had a relative that just happened to give me a Rolex! boo hoo it isn't small enough :) I have a 39mm mk 2 and love it :) 6.5 inch wrist
alweisenberger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:50 AM   #21
mgsooner
"TRF" Member
 
mgsooner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leoswag View Post
No way! Im happy to own a proper sport watch, not needing another dress watch style atm.
My whole bugging was about the size 39mm might have been not proportionate on me, but you guys have really helped me out. Thanks
I’ll give it a few weeks and see how I feel.
I will admit, I do wish it was 1mm smaller. I think at 38mm it would be absolutely perfect. However with its thin profile I still find it to wear extraordinarily comfortable on the wrist. It is more pleasant to wear than my Sub, particularly during warmer weather.
__________________
|Rolex Submariner 114060|Rolex Datejust 126234 silver dial|
|Tudor Heritage Chrono 70330B|
|Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz|
mgsooner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:58 AM   #22
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
I much prefer the 36mm original Explorer.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 10:58 AM   #23
Morrisdog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 72
Looks good to me but I am sure the 36mm will also look good. Perhaps try out the 36mm size and see what you like better..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Morrisdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:08 AM   #24
JWD531
"TRF" Member
 
JWD531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Tulsa, OK
Watch: 126710 BLNR
Posts: 621
I think it looks great, but 36 would look okay too. I’d definitely stay at 40 and below.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JWD531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:08 AM   #25
bay-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CA-USA
Posts: 258
I think it fits you perfectly.
Theres a reason 36mm watches are so much cheaper than 39/40mm watches, most people think they are too small. My wife even thinks a 36mm is too small for her wrist.
bay-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:09 AM   #26
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,824
I think that it sits on your wrist perfectly.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:09 AM   #27
Marcjvr
"TRF" Member
 
Marcjvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,554
I’ll be honest, I absolutely love my Explorer, but every once in a random while I do look at it and wish it was 1-2mm smaller.
Marcjvr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:40 AM   #28
Ocog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 68
Everyone has different taste but in my opinion if the lugs are as wide as your wrist its too big. If you can see some skin, you should be fine.
Ocog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 11:42 AM   #29
johnorpheus
"TRF" Member
 
johnorpheus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Washington D.C.
Watch: all of them
Posts: 1,259
If anything you could go bigger. With 7" wrist you could probably rock an SD43. All personal taste though. I say give it time. If it turns out you like smaller references, that's perfectly fine, but it may grow on you.
johnorpheus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2020, 01:20 PM   #30
Paulsky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: New York City
Posts: 87
I agree with you. For a time only watch it does wear too big. I had the 214270 and I wound up flipping it precisely because I felt it wore too big, even though I have a 7.5 inch wrist. It’s not so much the size. I have a 39mm OP and it feels great on my wrist. The problem with the 39mm Explorer is the flat bezel and huge numerals. They make the watch look too big.
Definitely get a 114270. Great watch and perfect proportions.
Paulsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.