The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 July 2021, 01:30 PM   #1
LuVitt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Delaware
Posts: 46
Vintage Market Opinion: Jubilee or Oyster on the GMT

Who better to ask an odd and more modern question, than the vintage collectors and experts within this community?!

I wanted to ask you your thoughts on the NEW Pepsi & Batman and which bracelet you prefer - Jubilee or Oyster?

It was always my perspective the vintage GMTs with the Jubilee Bracelet was so fitting and different. I almost felt like they were more rare (excuse my lack of knowledge if not true).

So I'm curious from your expertise, do you think this was the right move to bring it back?

Do you think the Jubilee Bracelet will be more desired than the Oyster?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!!
LuVitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2021, 02:32 PM   #2
chocopeluche
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: san francisco
Posts: 472
Seems like a good idea to me because it can appeal to more people. Id be getting the jubilee, and Im sure there are a ton who prefer oyster.

I believe the president bracelet has been offered on the 1680/8 I think that would be a cool addition to the current lineup.
__________________
Rolex OQ Fanatic

SF, CA
chocopeluche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2021, 06:00 PM   #3
robinmgb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
There are far fewer 16710 models around on jubilee bracelets but equally much less demand as the oyster always seems more sought after.
I’ve owned twice on jubilees and have found them more difficult to sell even when priced very competitively, the dealer that bought my excellent full set example around 6 months ago still has it for sale and it’s not over priced !
robinmgb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2021, 10:13 PM   #4
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Personal preference. But I’ll share that when I bought my 1983 16750, it had a jubilee and I do think that the jubilee depressed the price a bit.

I sold the jubilee with correct endlinks (which is actually very desirable as a stand alone bracelet sale) and bought a period correct oyster 78360 with 580s and brought down my net cost of the watch even further.

Strangely enough though, I’m waiting for a BLRO and would prefer that with a jubilee for a bit of a change…
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2021, 11:26 PM   #5
FrankCastello
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Posts: 36
Why not own both?
FrankCastello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 July 2021, 11:27 PM   #6
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 5,816
I feel like GMTs historically are typically oyster. I do like the reintroduction of oyster to the line, and prefer that variant to the new ones on jubilee.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 116400GV | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 12:48 AM   #7
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinmgb View Post
There are far fewer 16710 models around on jubilee bracelets but equally much less demand as the oyster always seems more sought after.
I’ve owned twice on jubilees and have found them more difficult to sell even when priced very competitively, the dealer that bought my excellent full set example around 6 months ago still has it for sale and it’s not over priced !
Interesting observation. My experience has been just the opposite and I find most collectors favor the Jubilee on the 1675/16750s and also on the the later sapphire GMT models.

How about sending me a link to that GMT on a Jubilee for sale.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 12:51 AM   #8
LuVitt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Delaware
Posts: 46
Very interesting to hear everyone's opinion! I feel the jubilee on vintage models is more fitting; however, it scares people away as they don't age as well.

The more modern jubilee will not have that issue.

I didn't know if form a "purest" perspective the jubilee was supposed to be more fitting for the watch.

I heard it was first released on a jubilee bracelet but never was able to have that 100% confirmed or maybe I just read something wrong.
LuVitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 12:52 AM   #9
LuVitt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Delaware
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Interesting observation. My experience has been just the opposite and I find most collectors favor the Jubilee on the 1675/16750s and also on the the later sapphire GMT models.

How about sending me a link to that GMT on a Jubilee for sale.
I would love to see the watch as well!
LuVitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 02:47 AM   #10
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 5,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuVitt View Post

The more modern jubilee will not have that issue….
I beg to differ. I think they will stretch all the same. More of an illusion of more quality over vintage pieces than a true difference. The pins are pulling at the same amount of metal, the added solidity between pins within the link means nothing.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 116400GV | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 02:57 AM   #11
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 525
This is where I stand;
Plexy (1675-1675/3 and 1675/8) on Jubelee
5 digits could be on both but Oyster I think looks more appropriate
I love the new 6 digits with the Jubelee, nice move to go back to the origins.

With that said I notice that my new Jubelee will have the same problem of the old one, meaning easier to give with time, but I don’t mind, is too confortable.
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 03:08 AM   #12
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankCastello View Post
Why not own both?
Exactly just get one of each.
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2021, 03:17 AM   #13
LuVitt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Delaware
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by baumare View Post
This is where I stand;
Plexy (1675-1675/3 and 1675/8) on Jubelee
5 digits could be on both but Oyster I think looks more appropriate
I love the new 6 digits with the Jubelee, nice move to go back to the origins.

With that said I notice that my new Jubelee will have the same problem of the old one, meaning easier to give with time, but I don’t mind, is too confortable.
Great assessment!
LuVitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.