ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 January 2014, 05:24 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
Rolex In Heavy Weight Showdown...!
Got some free time, took some photos and decided to share it here and make my first real contribution.
I've always been a loyal fan of Panerai and never Rolex until they created The Deepsea. The IWC Aquatimer is just so iconic that its a must have for me. So here are my 3 deep divers up for a cage fight. The contenders are , Rolex Deepsea - Iwc GST Aquatimer 3536 - Panerai Pam 243 |
18 January 2014, 05:25 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
1) Depth Rating
Rolex won hands down with the deepest rating of 3900m. Aquatimer 2000, as the name suggest, is half the depth of the Deepsea at 2000m, and Pam 243 is half of the Aquatimer at 1000m. Actual testing- Deepsea 4,875m. Aquatimer 2000 3,200m. 243 ? I have not been able to get any info on this. |
18 January 2014, 05:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
2) Size
243 is ahead by just a bit at 44mm, while Deepsea is at 43mm and Iwc is at 42mm. This measurement is without crown. With crown, there's no contesting who's the winner. Case with crown- 243 approx 51mm Deepsea approx 48mm Aquatimer approx 45mm |
18 January 2014, 05:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
3) Thickness/Crown
243 took this category with the thickest casing and biggest crown w/crown guard followed closely by Deepsea while Iwc is no match against the big boys with no crown guard and the thinness among the three. The 243 has the 1000m markings on the crown lever while the Deepsea has the famous Crown signature. The Aquatimer is the interesting one with the old fish logo, apparently used before Richemont took over Iwc. Thickness- 243 18mm Deepsea 17.68mm Aquatimer 14mm |
18 January 2014, 05:28 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
4) Dial
This is a pretty close contest between all three but purely my personal opinion, Aquatimer won this round. The ala military dial and minimalist look, compensate the lack of AR coating and lume on the second hand tip. Not talking about lume here, purely dial aesthetic in terms of legibility , wordings and date. It's madness, the amount of character on the Deepsea. Lol! Number of words (characters) on the dials (including digits and symbols) Aquatimer 47 243 50 Deepsea 141 |
18 January 2014, 05:29 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
5) Caseback
Rolex emerged the winner here. The caseback being one of the three core component in the ring lock system to withstand immense pressure. The Aquatimer has a pretty decent case back with the Submarine logo and the 243 is the one with the most info engraved on its back. Screw down case back Deepsea Stainless Steel ring with titanium alloy Aquatimer Titanium 243 Stainless Steel |
18 January 2014, 05:30 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
6) Bezel
Aquatimer is the champion here with its unique bezel where you have to press down in order to rotate it. It's useful for divers as it practically eliminates the possibility of the bezel turning accidentally. The Deepsea have an impressive ceramic bezel insert, an upgrade in the recent changes from the older aluminum bezel found in Rolex earlier divers. 243 bezel have a nice contrast with its polished indicators against the brushed bezel. Number of clicks Deepsea 120 clicks Aquatimer 60 clicks 243 60 clicks |
18 January 2014, 05:31 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
7) Bracelet/Strap
This is a very very difficult category. All three divers have their strengths. Deepsea with its impressive glidelock bracelet. Aquatimer with its well engineered push pin system. 243 with the unlimited ability to mount practically any straps. The winner? All three score a point. It's a tie. |
18 January 2014, 05:31 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
8) Availability/Rarity
Both the Aquatimer and 243 are a discontinued model and Deepsea is widely available in the market. Tie between 243 and Aquatimer. 243 2500 pieces Aquatimer 3000 pieces Deepsea current production |
18 January 2014, 05:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
9) Weight/Comfortability
No contest here when it comes to the weight. Deepsea is the real Heavy Weight champion! But since the arrival of the Aquatimer, the Champion is having a hard time to get on the wrist. The Aquatimer is so comfortable for daily wear. Since we are talking about weight and comfortability, Deepsea wins. The trick is to really fit the bracelet to your wrist size and wear it like how it's supposed to be worn! I bet the complains about the tapered bracelet and top heavy will soon be gone. |
18 January 2014, 05:33 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
10) Conclusion
Score :-
Depth Rating - Deepsea Size - 243 Thickness/Crown - 243 Dial - Aquatimer Caseback - Deepsea Bezel - Aquatimer Bracelet/Straps - Deepsea/Aquatimer/243 Availability/Rarity - 243/Aquatimer Weight/Comfortability - Deepsea Total Deepsea 4 points Aquatimer 4 points 243 4 points It's a tie in total scored points between these three divers. I am lucky to own them and the only issue I have is deciding which one to wear. Lol. This comparison is purely from my point of view and will varies with different owners. Thanks for looking. Cheers. |
18 January 2014, 05:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Monterey Co. Ca.
Watch: 16610, 16613, 024
Posts: 439
|
That is a great collection.... love all three and the 243 is one of my favorite Panerai Submersible pieces..
__________________
|
18 January 2014, 12:37 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Watch: Yes please
Posts: 107
|
Thanks for the review. I've always liked the Aquatimer. Nice collection.
|
19 January 2014, 04:34 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
That was a great/fun contest. Well thought out and incredible pictures. Thanks for the review (BTW I concur with your findings...almost!).
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
19 October 2014, 01:23 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: LA CA
Posts: 34
|
Great Read!! Thx
|
19 October 2014, 02:36 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Nice photos and review!
|
19 October 2014, 05:18 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: GMT IIc, LVc
Posts: 737
|
Awesome Trio and a great review. I would have a hard time deciding in the morning.
|
19 October 2014, 05:54 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
|
Nice write up! You gotta get a ploprof up in the mix next time!
|
3 November 2014, 02:09 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
Great write up!
|
7 November 2014, 09:00 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Three great watches
__________________
|
7 November 2014, 09:13 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jonny
Location: Boston MA
Watch: GMTII Blue/Red
Posts: 566
|
Awesome post. Well done. Enjoy all three.
|
10 November 2014, 12:57 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Someone
Location: Somwhere
Watch: Tudor LHD
Posts: 1,001
|
I must say nice post. All 3 pieces are great. The panerai has such a cool look it is so hard not to get one. The deepsea well is a deepsea and is just bad ass. And I along with you love the bezel on the iwc. So for me the panerai wins on it's unique styling. Love your post!!
|
6 July 2015, 02:49 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 147
|
Great review,thx :)
|
21 July 2015, 05:29 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Great post
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
21 July 2015, 05:49 PM | #25 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,893
|
Good work but you missed the most important comparison Miki.
Desirability......
__________________
E |
22 July 2015, 06:26 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Submariner a
Posts: 467
|
Great collection!! congrats
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.