The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 January 2014, 05:24 AM   #1
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 Rolex In Heavy Weight Showdown...!

Got some free time, took some photos and decided to share it here and make my first real contribution.

I've always been a loyal fan of Panerai and never Rolex until they created The Deepsea. The IWC Aquatimer is just so iconic that its a must have for me. So here are my 3 deep divers up for a cage fight.



The contenders are , Rolex Deepsea - Iwc GST Aquatimer 3536 - Panerai Pam 243


Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:25 AM   #2
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 1) Depth Rating



Rolex won hands down with the deepest rating of 3900m. Aquatimer 2000, as the name suggest, is half the depth of the Deepsea at 2000m, and Pam 243 is half of the Aquatimer at 1000m.


Actual testing-
Deepsea 4,875m.
Aquatimer 2000 3,200m.
243 ? I have not been able to get any info on this.
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:26 AM   #3
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 2) Size



243 is ahead by just a bit at 44mm, while Deepsea is at 43mm and Iwc is at 42mm. This measurement is without crown. With crown, there's no contesting who's the winner.


Case with crown-


243 approx 51mm
Deepsea approx 48mm
Aquatimer approx 45mm
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:27 AM   #4
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 3) Thickness/Crown



243 took this category with the thickest casing and biggest crown w/crown guard followed closely by Deepsea while Iwc is no match against the big boys with no crown guard and the thinness among the three. The 243 has the 1000m markings on the crown lever while the Deepsea has the famous Crown signature. The Aquatimer is the interesting one with the old fish logo, apparently used before Richemont took over Iwc.


Thickness-
243 18mm
Deepsea 17.68mm
Aquatimer 14mm
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:28 AM   #5
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 4) Dial



This is a pretty close contest between all three but purely my personal opinion, Aquatimer won this round. The ala military dial and minimalist look, compensate the lack of AR coating and lume on the second hand tip. Not talking about lume here, purely dial aesthetic in terms of legibility , wordings and date. It's madness, the amount of character on the Deepsea. Lol!

Number of words (characters) on the dials (including digits and symbols)

Aquatimer 47
243 50
Deepsea 141
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:29 AM   #6
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 5) Caseback



Rolex emerged the winner here. The caseback being one of the three core component in the ring lock system to withstand immense pressure. The Aquatimer has a pretty decent case back with the Submarine logo and the 243 is the one with the most info engraved on its back.

Screw down case back

Deepsea Stainless Steel ring with titanium alloy
Aquatimer Titanium
243 Stainless Steel
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:30 AM   #7
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 6) Bezel



Aquatimer is the champion here with its unique bezel where you have to press down in order to rotate it. It's useful for divers as it practically eliminates the possibility of the bezel turning accidentally. The Deepsea have an impressive ceramic bezel insert, an upgrade in the recent changes from the older aluminum bezel found in Rolex earlier divers. 243 bezel have a nice contrast with its polished indicators against the brushed bezel.

Number of clicks

Deepsea 120 clicks
Aquatimer 60 clicks
243 60 clicks
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:31 AM   #8
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 7) Bracelet/Strap



This is a very very difficult category. All three divers have their strengths. Deepsea with its impressive glidelock bracelet. Aquatimer with its well engineered push pin system. 243 with the unlimited ability to mount practically any straps. The winner? All three score a point. It's a tie.
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:31 AM   #9
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 8) Availability/Rarity



Both the Aquatimer and 243 are a discontinued model and Deepsea is widely available in the market. Tie between 243 and Aquatimer.

243 2500 pieces
Aquatimer 3000 pieces
Deepsea current production
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:33 AM   #10
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 9) Weight/Comfortability





No contest here when it comes to the weight. Deepsea is the real Heavy Weight champion!

But since the arrival of the Aquatimer, the Champion is having a hard time to get on the wrist. The Aquatimer is so comfortable for daily wear. Since we are talking about weight and comfortability, Deepsea wins. The trick is to really fit the bracelet to your wrist size and wear it like how it's supposed to be worn! I bet the complains about the tapered bracelet and top heavy will soon be gone.
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:33 AM   #11
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6 10) Conclusion

Score :-

Depth Rating - Deepsea
Size - 243
Thickness/Crown - 243
Dial - Aquatimer
Caseback - Deepsea
Bezel - Aquatimer
Bracelet/Straps - Deepsea/Aquatimer/243
Availability/Rarity - 243/Aquatimer
Weight/Comfortability - Deepsea

Total
Deepsea 4 points
Aquatimer 4 points
243 4 points

It's a tie in total scored points between these three divers. I am lucky to own them and the only issue I have is deciding which one to wear. Lol.

This comparison is purely from my point of view and will varies with different owners.

Thanks for looking.

Cheers.
Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 05:36 AM   #12
cali kid
"TRF" Member
 
cali kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Monterey Co. Ca.
Watch: 16610, 16613, 024
Posts: 439
That is a great collection.... love all three and the 243 is one of my favorite Panerai Submersible pieces..
__________________
cali kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 12:37 PM   #13
GadgetGeek
"TRF" Member
 
GadgetGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Watch: Yes please
Posts: 107
Thanks for the review. I've always liked the Aquatimer. Nice collection.
GadgetGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2014, 04:34 AM   #14
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
That was a great/fun contest. Well thought out and incredible pictures. Thanks for the review (BTW I concur with your findings...almost!).
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2014, 01:23 AM   #15
GT1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: LA CA
Posts: 34
Great Read!! Thx
GT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2014, 02:36 AM   #16
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Nice photos and review!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2014, 05:18 AM   #17
playmore009
"TRF" Member
 
playmore009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: GMT IIc, LVc
Posts: 737
Awesome Trio and a great review. I would have a hard time deciding in the morning.
playmore009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 October 2014, 05:54 AM   #18
antbkny
"TRF" Member
 
antbkny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
Nice write up! You gotta get a ploprof up in the mix next time!
antbkny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2014, 02:09 PM   #19
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
Great write up!
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2014, 09:00 AM   #20
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Three great watches
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2014, 09:13 AM   #21
TripleB Boston
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jonny
Location: Boston MA
Watch: GMTII Blue/Red
Posts: 566
Awesome post. Well done. Enjoy all three.
TripleB Boston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2014, 12:57 AM   #22
dominic.warren
"TRF" Member
 
dominic.warren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Someone
Location: Somwhere
Watch: Tudor LHD
Posts: 1,001
I must say nice post. All 3 pieces are great. The panerai has such a cool look it is so hard not to get one. The deepsea well is a deepsea and is just bad ass. And I along with you love the bezel on the iwc. So for me the panerai wins on it's unique styling. Love your post!!
dominic.warren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2015, 02:49 PM   #23
Marvoon
"TRF" Member
 
Marvoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 147
Great review,thx :)
Marvoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:29 PM   #24
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Great post
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 05:49 PM   #25
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,893
Good work but you missed the most important comparison Miki.















































Desirability......
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 06:26 AM   #26
Santiago79
"TRF" Member
 
Santiago79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Submariner a
Posts: 467
Great collection!! congrats
Santiago79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.